Duplex Ultrasound Investigation for the Detection of Obstructed Iliocaval Venous Stents.
Adult
Blood Flow Velocity
Databases, Factual
Endovascular Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Iliac Vein
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Phlebography
Predictive Value of Tests
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Stents
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
Vascular Diseases
/ diagnostic imaging
Vascular Patency
Vena Cava, Inferior
/ diagnostic imaging
Young Adult
Duplex criteria
Duplex ultrasound
Post-thrombotic syndrome
Stent surveillance
Venous stent stenosis
Venous stent thrombosis
Journal
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
ISSN: 1532-2165
Titre abrégé: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9512728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
01
10
2019
revised:
01
04
2020
accepted:
04
05
2020
pubmed:
2
7
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
2
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is used for routine surveillance of stents in iliocaval veins, but direct visualisation is often challenging. Duplex ultrasound criteria for detecting venous stent obstruction (VSO) have not been defined to date. A nested case control study of 120 patients (42 ± 17 years, 53% women, mean 2.7 ± 1.8 stents) was performed, and the performance of various duplex parameters for detecting VSO (defined as > 50% lumen diameter reduction or occlusion) was tested, confirmed by biplane venography or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Forty patients with VSO (25 with stent occlusion, 15 with >50% in stent stenosis) were matched to 80 control patients by age, gender and index diagnosis who fulfilled the following criteria: (1) ongoing symptom control (Villalta score < 5), (2) good image quality of entire stent segment, (3) spontaneous colour Doppler signal > 50% of lumen in entire stent segment, (4) at least two DUS where the baseline DUS was obtained within 24 h after successful venous intervention. The best test was the combination of peak flow velocity and flow pattern analysis at the stent inlet. A peak flow velocity >10 cm/s and a flow pattern spontaneously modulated by respiration ruled out VSO with a specificity of 93.7% (95% CI 86.0%-97.3%). A peak flow velocity ≤10 cm/s or any Doppler flow pattern other than spontaneously modulated by respiration was 92.1% (95% CI 79.2%-97.3%) sensitive to detect VSO. The combination of peak flow velocity and analysis of Doppler flow pattern at the stent inlet is accurate to diagnose or rule out stent occlusion. Indirect criteria should always be combined with direct visualisation of iliocaval stents since those may be less sensitive for detecting stent stenosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32605854
pii: S1078-5884(20)30428-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.011
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
443-450Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.