Education Experiences of Adult Subjects and Caregivers for Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation at Home.

airway clearance cough assist mechanical insufflation-exsufflation neuromuscular disease patient education respiratory insufficiency self-management teaching

Journal

Respiratory care
ISSN: 1943-3654
Titre abrégé: Respir Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7510357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 2 7 2020
medline: 23 2 2021
entrez: 2 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In 2014, the Ministry of Health of Ontario, Canada, approved a program of public funding for specialist-prescribed mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) devices for home use by individuals with neuromuscular respiratory insufficiency. Since 2014, 1,926 MI-E devices have been provided, exceeding device-use projections. Few studies describe the initial and ongoing education and support needs of home MI-E users and their family caregivers. This study aimed to explore the requirements of initial and ongoing education and support for MI-E device use, user confidence, and barriers and facilitators to home MI-E. We conducted semi-structured interviews with new (< 6 months) and established (6-48 months) MI-E users and family caregivers. Device users rated their confidence on a numeric rating scale of 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident). We recruited 14 new and 14 established MI-E users and caregivers (including 9 dyads), and we conducted 28 interviews. Both new and established users were highly confident in use of MI-E (mean ± SD scores were 8.8 ± 1.2 and 8.3 ± 2.1, respectively). Overall, the subjects were satisfied with their initial education, which consisted of a 1-2 h one-on-one session at home or in the clinic with a device demonstration and hands-on practice. Subjects viewed hands-on practice and teaching of caregivers as more beneficial than written materials. Ongoing support for device use was variable. Most subjects indicated a lack of specific follow-up, which resulted in uncertainty about whether they were using the MI-E device correctly or whether MI-E was effective. Facilitators to device utilization were ease of use, initial training, support from formal or informal caregivers, and symptom relief. Barriers were inadequate education on MI-E purpose, technique, and benefit; lack of follow-up; and inadequate knowledge of MI-E by nonspecialist health providers. The current model of home MI-E education at initiation meets user and caregiver needs. Better ongoing education and follow-up are needed to sustain the benefits through assessment of MI-E technique and its effectiveness.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In 2014, the Ministry of Health of Ontario, Canada, approved a program of public funding for specialist-prescribed mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) devices for home use by individuals with neuromuscular respiratory insufficiency. Since 2014, 1,926 MI-E devices have been provided, exceeding device-use projections. Few studies describe the initial and ongoing education and support needs of home MI-E users and their family caregivers. This study aimed to explore the requirements of initial and ongoing education and support for MI-E device use, user confidence, and barriers and facilitators to home MI-E.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted semi-structured interviews with new (< 6 months) and established (6-48 months) MI-E users and family caregivers. Device users rated their confidence on a numeric rating scale of 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident).
RESULTS RESULTS
We recruited 14 new and 14 established MI-E users and caregivers (including 9 dyads), and we conducted 28 interviews. Both new and established users were highly confident in use of MI-E (mean ± SD scores were 8.8 ± 1.2 and 8.3 ± 2.1, respectively). Overall, the subjects were satisfied with their initial education, which consisted of a 1-2 h one-on-one session at home or in the clinic with a device demonstration and hands-on practice. Subjects viewed hands-on practice and teaching of caregivers as more beneficial than written materials. Ongoing support for device use was variable. Most subjects indicated a lack of specific follow-up, which resulted in uncertainty about whether they were using the MI-E device correctly or whether MI-E was effective. Facilitators to device utilization were ease of use, initial training, support from formal or informal caregivers, and symptom relief. Barriers were inadequate education on MI-E purpose, technique, and benefit; lack of follow-up; and inadequate knowledge of MI-E by nonspecialist health providers.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The current model of home MI-E education at initiation meets user and caregiver needs. Better ongoing education and follow-up are needed to sustain the benefits through assessment of MI-E technique and its effectiveness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32606074
pii: respcare.07534
doi: 10.4187/respcare.07534
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1889-1896

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

This study was supported by a grant from the International Ventilator Users Network. The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Craig M Dale (CM)

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. craig.dale@utoronto.ca.
TECC Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.

Doug McKim (D)

The Ottawa Hospital Respiratory Rehabilitation, The Ottawa Hospital Sleep Centre and Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Reshma Amin (R)

Division of Respiratory Medicine, SickKids Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Sarah Carbone (S)

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Tom Fisher (T)

Ventilator Equipment Pool, Kingston, Canada.

Roger Goldstein (R)

West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Sherri Katz (S)

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Andrea Gershon (A)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Respirology and Clinical Immunology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.

David Leasa (D)

Department of Medicine, Divisions of Critical Care and Respirology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada.

Mika Nonoyama (M)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada.
Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Regina Pizutti (R)

Ventilator Equipment Pool, Kingston, Canada.

Anu Tandon (A)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Respirology and Clinical Immunology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Louise Rose (L)

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH