Effect of Lowering the Blood Alcohol Concentration Limit to 0.03 Among Hospitalized Trauma Patients in Southern Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
BAC
DWI
alcohol
alcohol-related crashes
blood alcohol concentration
driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol
driving while intoxicated
law sanction
mortality
Journal
Risk management and healthcare policy
ISSN: 1179-1594
Titre abrégé: Risk Manag Healthc Policy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566264
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
21
02
2020
accepted:
20
05
2020
entrez:
2
7
2020
pubmed:
2
7
2020
medline:
2
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In June 2013, the legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for driving was lowered from 0.05 to 0.03 mg/mL in Taiwan. Thus, this study aimed to assess the epidemiological changes in terms of drinking among drivers in southern Taiwan before and after the law was imposed. Only patients who had undergone the BAC test at the emergency room were included in the study. The patients during the study period before (n = 2735) and after (n = 2413) the implementation of the law were selected for comparison. Drunk patients were defined as those who had a BAC ≥0.005 and were considered as driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol. Meanwhile, driving while intoxicated (DWI) was defined as a BAC ≥0.05, which was the level adopted in the new law. Since the BAC limit lowered to 0.03, the number of DUI patients significantly decreased from 340 (12.4%) to 171 (7.1%), and that of DWI patients significantly reduced from 273 (10.0%) to 146 (6.1%) based on the alcohol test. In addition, after the implementation of the law, the number of associated injuries did not significantly decrease from that before the law was implemented in patients involved in alcohol-related crashes. After lowering the legal BAC limit from 0.05 to 0.03, responsiveness to the change in law was observed among the studied population. However, such responsiveness may not be observed in some citizens who may need special interventions to help reduce their behavior of drinking and driving.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In June 2013, the legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for driving was lowered from 0.05 to 0.03 mg/mL in Taiwan. Thus, this study aimed to assess the epidemiological changes in terms of drinking among drivers in southern Taiwan before and after the law was imposed.
METHODS
METHODS
Only patients who had undergone the BAC test at the emergency room were included in the study. The patients during the study period before (n = 2735) and after (n = 2413) the implementation of the law were selected for comparison. Drunk patients were defined as those who had a BAC ≥0.005 and were considered as driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol. Meanwhile, driving while intoxicated (DWI) was defined as a BAC ≥0.05, which was the level adopted in the new law.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Since the BAC limit lowered to 0.03, the number of DUI patients significantly decreased from 340 (12.4%) to 171 (7.1%), and that of DWI patients significantly reduced from 273 (10.0%) to 146 (6.1%) based on the alcohol test. In addition, after the implementation of the law, the number of associated injuries did not significantly decrease from that before the law was implemented in patients involved in alcohol-related crashes.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
After lowering the legal BAC limit from 0.05 to 0.03, responsiveness to the change in law was observed among the studied population. However, such responsiveness may not be observed in some citizens who may need special interventions to help reduce their behavior of drinking and driving.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32607025
doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S250734
pii: 250734
pmc: PMC7305841
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
571-581Informations de copyright
© 2020 Huang et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests associated with this article.
Références
Ergonomics. 1988 Apr;31(4):663-8
pubmed: 3402425
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:200-5
pubmed: 23792619
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Oct;107:102-109
pubmed: 28818681
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Jun;31(3):527-32
pubmed: 12055145
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 21;13(5):
pubmed: 27455295
Accid Anal Prev. 1995 Apr;27(2):151-7
pubmed: 7786382
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1523-30
pubmed: 20728598
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(4):329-34
pubmed: 23531254
Scand J Public Health. 2014 Mar;42(2):177-83
pubmed: 24265165
Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;125:649-57
pubmed: 25307602
Glob Health Promot. 2011 Mar;18(1):23-6
pubmed: 21721296
Biomed J. 2017 Apr;40(2):113-120
pubmed: 28521902
Addiction. 2011 Sep;106(9):1614-22
pubmed: 21689195
Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Jul;35(4):579-87
pubmed: 12729821
J Safety Res. 2018 Feb;64:49-54
pubmed: 29636169
Biomed J. 2018 Oct;41(5):321-327
pubmed: 30580796
Med Sci Law. 1988 Apr;28(2):165-70
pubmed: 3386467
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e026481
pubmed: 31005931
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jul;80:106-16
pubmed: 25899058
Addiction. 2014 Jun;109(6):869-74
pubmed: 24898061
Subst Use Misuse. 1998 Dec;33(14):2757-88
pubmed: 9869442
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:73-81
pubmed: 29203026
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:262-274
pubmed: 28651146
Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):412-20
pubmed: 20470967
J Health Econ. 2004 Jan;23(1):61-83
pubmed: 15154688
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Nov-Dec;57(6):326-40
pubmed: 17989128
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Nov 16;17(8):771-81
pubmed: 26980557
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Nov;21(4 Suppl):66-88
pubmed: 11691562
Inj Prev. 2015 Apr;21(e1):e28-35
pubmed: 24397929
Biomed J. 2017 Apr;40(2):121-128
pubmed: 28521903
Addiction. 1993 Jan;88 Suppl:27S-33S
pubmed: 8453341
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2007 Sep;14(3):181-7
pubmed: 17729137
J Safety Res. 2006;37(3):233-43
pubmed: 16824545
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(5):440-2
pubmed: 25375366