Prevalence of Tracheostomy and Its Indications in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Indications Meta-Analysis Prevalence Systematic Review Tracheostomy

Journal

Tanaffos
ISSN: 1735-0344
Titre abrégé: Tanaffos
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101308232

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Historique:
entrez: 2 7 2020
pubmed: 1 4 2019
medline: 1 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tracheostomy is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Reconsideration of tracheostomy indications in patients can be effective in modifying and reducing irrevocable patient complaints. The present study aimed to analyze the prevalence of tracheostomy indications and to estimate the prevalence of tracheostomy in Iran. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, scientific databases were searched from January 1990 to April 2018. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) use of the term "tracheotomy" in the title; and 2) studies conducted in Iran. On the other hand, the exclusion criteria were: 1) studies that did not specify the type of mechanical ventilation; 2) studies that did not quantitatively report the indications; 3) studies without access to the full-text; and 4) case studies, letters to the editor, and/or prefaces. Data were extracted from published reports. Our preliminary results included estimations of tracheostomy indications in Iran. In the preliminary search, a total of 325 articles were found, 24 of which were considered eligible. Among 2860 patients who had undergone tracheostomy, 21 indications were identified. Decreased mental status, respiratory disease, and tumors were the most frequent indications. The prevalence of tracheostomy was 40.59% in Iran, with the highest and lowest rates reported in Birjand and Ardabil, respectively (136.50 and 6.63 in 100,000 people, respectively) based on the random effects model. The most prevalent indications in Iran are different from those reported in other countries. This difference may be due to the lack of trained medical personnel and available technologies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Tracheostomy is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Reconsideration of tracheostomy indications in patients can be effective in modifying and reducing irrevocable patient complaints. The present study aimed to analyze the prevalence of tracheostomy indications and to estimate the prevalence of tracheostomy in Iran.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, scientific databases were searched from January 1990 to April 2018. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) use of the term "tracheotomy" in the title; and 2) studies conducted in Iran. On the other hand, the exclusion criteria were: 1) studies that did not specify the type of mechanical ventilation; 2) studies that did not quantitatively report the indications; 3) studies without access to the full-text; and 4) case studies, letters to the editor, and/or prefaces. Data were extracted from published reports. Our preliminary results included estimations of tracheostomy indications in Iran.
RESULTS RESULTS
In the preliminary search, a total of 325 articles were found, 24 of which were considered eligible. Among 2860 patients who had undergone tracheostomy, 21 indications were identified. Decreased mental status, respiratory disease, and tumors were the most frequent indications. The prevalence of tracheostomy was 40.59% in Iran, with the highest and lowest rates reported in Birjand and Ardabil, respectively (136.50 and 6.63 in 100,000 people, respectively) based on the random effects model.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The most prevalent indications in Iran are different from those reported in other countries. This difference may be due to the lack of trained medical personnel and available technologies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32607109
pii: Tanaffos-18-285
pmc: PMC7309891

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

285-293

Informations de copyright

Copyright© 2019 National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

Références

Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:93-8
pubmed: 22319246
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jun;77(6):922-5
pubmed: 23537927
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Aug;87:144-7
pubmed: 27368463
Laryngoscope. 2003 Jan;113(1):1-10
pubmed: 12514373
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Oct;26(10):1428-33
pubmed: 11126252
Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1639-43
pubmed: 18931225
Indian J Surg. 2017 Oct;79(5):406-411
pubmed: 29089699
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Jan;20(1):49-54
pubmed: 28112532
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Oct;79(10):1673-6
pubmed: 26255606
Chest. 2003 Jan;123(1):151-8
pubmed: 12527616
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):890-5
pubmed: 22197004
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Nov;94(47):e2015
pubmed: 26632698
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2013 Apr;21(2):187-92
pubmed: 24532618
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;21(1):33-37
pubmed: 28050205
Acta Med Iran. 2012;50(8):525-9
pubmed: 23109023

Auteurs

Alireza Alidad (A)

Speech and Language Pathology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Alireza Aghaz (A)

Research Committee and Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Ehsan Hemmati (E)

Research Committee and Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Hussein Jadidi (H)

Research Committee and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Kayvan Aghazadeh (K)

Department of ENT, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Classifications MeSH