Influence of intra- and interspecific variation in predator-prey body size ratios on trophic interaction strengths.
Bluegill
context‐dependency
functional response
interaction strength
largemouth bass
piscivory
size‐scaling
tilapia
Journal
Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
09
01
2020
revised:
07
04
2020
accepted:
14
04
2020
entrez:
2
7
2020
pubmed:
2
7
2020
medline:
2
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Predation is a pervasive force that structures food webs and directly influences ecosystem functioning. The relative body sizes of predators and prey may be an important determinant of interaction strengths. However, studies quantifying the combined influence of intra- and interspecific variation in predator-prey body size ratios are lacking.We use a comparative functional response approach to examine interaction strengths between three size classes of invasive bluegill and largemouth bass toward three scaled size classes of their tilapia prey. We then quantify the influence of intra- and interspecific predator-prey body mass ratios on the scaling of attack rates and handling times.Type II functional responses were displayed by both predators across all predator and prey size classes. Largemouth bass consumed more than bluegill at small and intermediate predator size classes, while large predators of both species were more similar. Small prey were most vulnerable overall; however, differential attack rates among prey were emergent across predator sizes. For both bluegill and largemouth bass, small predators exhibited higher attack rates toward small and intermediate prey sizes, while larger predators exhibited greater attack rates toward large prey. Conversely, handling times increased with prey size, with small bluegill exhibiting particularly low feeding rates toward medium-large prey types. Attack rates for both predators peaked unimodally at intermediate predator-prey body mass ratios, while handling times generally shortened across increasing body mass ratios.We thus demonstrate effects of body size ratios on predator-prey interaction strengths between key fish species, with attack rates and handling times dependent on the relative sizes of predator-prey participants.Considerations for intra- and interspecific body size ratio effects are critical for predicting the strengths of interactions within ecosystems and may drive differential ecological impacts among invasive species as size ratios shift.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32607203
doi: 10.1002/ece3.6332
pii: ECE36332
pmc: PMC7319243
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.7m0cfxppt']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5946-5962Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Mar;19(3):833-42
pubmed: 23504840
Ecol Lett. 2017 Jul;20(7):852-862
pubmed: 28544190
Oecologia. 2016 Dec;182(4):1129-1140
pubmed: 27517878
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jun;3(6):919-927
pubmed: 31110252
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 28;8(10):e76389
pubmed: 24204620
Ecol Lett. 2019 Nov;22(11):1870-1878
pubmed: 31436021
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jun 01;10(12):5946-5962
pubmed: 32607203
Biol Lett. 2008 Apr 23;4(2):166-9
pubmed: 18089520
J Fish Biol. 2014 May;84(5):1271-88
pubmed: 24661110
Biol Lett. 2018 Jul;14(7):
pubmed: 30045905
Ecol Lett. 2011 Sep;14(9):914-21
pubmed: 21752171
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jul 7;270(1522):1413-7
pubmed: 12965034
Nature. 2007 Dec 20;450(7173):1226-9
pubmed: 18097408
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Dec 7;3(12):160414
pubmed: 28083093
Monogr Popul Biol. 1978;(13):III-VII, 1-237
pubmed: 732858
Am Nat. 2011 Jun;177(6):752-66
pubmed: 21597252
Oecologia. 2012 Nov;170(3):629-39
pubmed: 22565492
J Anim Ecol. 2009 Nov;78(6):1152-62
pubmed: 19682142
Biol Lett. 2014 Feb 12;10(2):20130946
pubmed: 24522629
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004 May;79(2):337-49
pubmed: 15191227
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 1;5(8):180339
pubmed: 30225019
Ecology. 2018 Jul;99(7):1591-1601
pubmed: 29738085
Oecologia. 2007 Aug;153(1):57-67
pubmed: 17415592
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61019
pubmed: 23565294
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 6;8(1):11787
pubmed: 30082837
J Med Entomol. 2019 Sep 3;56(5):1428-1432
pubmed: 31038180
Oecologia. 2017 Nov;185(3):339-346
pubmed: 28936547
Ecology. 2013 May;94(5):1046-56
pubmed: 23858645
Environ Entomol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1474-80
pubmed: 23321095
J Anim Ecol. 2008 May;77(3):478-86
pubmed: 18312336
Nat Commun. 2015 Mar 04;6:6441
pubmed: 25737320
Ecol Lett. 2016 Jun;19(6):668-78
pubmed: 27094829