Trends in and drivers of healthcare expenditure in the English NHS: a retrospective analysis.
Activity
Cost
Demographic pressures
Drivers
Healthcare expenditure
Technology
Journal
Health economics review
ISSN: 2191-1991
Titre abrégé: Health Econ Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101583209
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jun 2020
30 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
06
03
2020
accepted:
23
06
2020
entrez:
2
7
2020
pubmed:
2
7
2020
medline:
2
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In England, rises in healthcare expenditure consistently outpace growth in both GDP and total public expenditure. To ensure the National Health Service (NHS) remains financially sustainable, relevant data on healthcare expenditure are needed to inform decisions about which services should be delivered, by whom and in which settings. We analyse routine data on NHS expenditure in England over 9 years (2008/09 to 2016/17). To quantify the relative contribution of the different care settings to overall healthcare expenditure, we analyse trends in 14 healthcare settings under three broad categories: Hospital Based Care (HBC), Diagnostics and Therapeutics (D&T) and Community Care (CC). We exclude primary care and community mental health services settings due to a lack of consistent data. We employ a set of indices to aggregate diverse outputs and to disentangle growth in healthcare expenditure that is driven by activity from that due to cost pressures. We identify potential drivers of the observed trends from published studies. Over the 9-year study period, combined NHS expenditure on HBC, D&T and CC rose by 50.2%. Expenditure on HBC rose by 54.1%, corresponding to increases in both activity (29.2%) and cost (15.7%). Rises in expenditure in inpatient (38.5%), outpatient (57.2%), and A&E (59.5%) settings were driven predominately by higher activity. Emergency admissions rose for both short-stay (45.6%) and long-stay cases (26.2%). There was a switch away from inpatient elective care (which fell by 5.1%) and towards day case care (34.8% rise), likely reflecting financial incentives for same-day discharges. Growth in expenditure on D&T (155.2%) was driven by rises in the volume of high cost drugs (270.5%) and chemotherapy (110.2%). Community prescribing grew by 45.2%, with costs falling by 24.4%. Evidence on the relationship between new technologies and healthcare expenditure is mixed, but the fall in drug costs could reflect low generic prices, and the use of health technology assessment or commercial arrangements to inform pricing of new medicines. Aggregate trends in HCE mask enormous variation across healthcare settings. Understanding variation in activity and cost across settings is an important initial step towards ensuring the long-term sustainability of the NHS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In England, rises in healthcare expenditure consistently outpace growth in both GDP and total public expenditure. To ensure the National Health Service (NHS) remains financially sustainable, relevant data on healthcare expenditure are needed to inform decisions about which services should be delivered, by whom and in which settings.
METHODS
METHODS
We analyse routine data on NHS expenditure in England over 9 years (2008/09 to 2016/17). To quantify the relative contribution of the different care settings to overall healthcare expenditure, we analyse trends in 14 healthcare settings under three broad categories: Hospital Based Care (HBC), Diagnostics and Therapeutics (D&T) and Community Care (CC). We exclude primary care and community mental health services settings due to a lack of consistent data. We employ a set of indices to aggregate diverse outputs and to disentangle growth in healthcare expenditure that is driven by activity from that due to cost pressures. We identify potential drivers of the observed trends from published studies.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Over the 9-year study period, combined NHS expenditure on HBC, D&T and CC rose by 50.2%. Expenditure on HBC rose by 54.1%, corresponding to increases in both activity (29.2%) and cost (15.7%). Rises in expenditure in inpatient (38.5%), outpatient (57.2%), and A&E (59.5%) settings were driven predominately by higher activity. Emergency admissions rose for both short-stay (45.6%) and long-stay cases (26.2%). There was a switch away from inpatient elective care (which fell by 5.1%) and towards day case care (34.8% rise), likely reflecting financial incentives for same-day discharges. Growth in expenditure on D&T (155.2%) was driven by rises in the volume of high cost drugs (270.5%) and chemotherapy (110.2%). Community prescribing grew by 45.2%, with costs falling by 24.4%. Evidence on the relationship between new technologies and healthcare expenditure is mixed, but the fall in drug costs could reflect low generic prices, and the use of health technology assessment or commercial arrangements to inform pricing of new medicines.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Aggregate trends in HCE mask enormous variation across healthcare settings. Understanding variation in activity and cost across settings is an important initial step towards ensuring the long-term sustainability of the NHS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32607791
doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00278-9
pii: 10.1186/s13561-020-00278-9
pmc: PMC7325682
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
20Subventions
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
ID : 103/0001
Références
Health Econ Policy Law. 2008 Apr;3(Pt 2):165-95
pubmed: 18634626
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Nov;15(8):885-96
pubmed: 24292437
Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Apr;28(2):179-86
pubmed: 26840615
J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):88-105
pubmed: 23202257
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):872-881
pubmed: 28774549
Health Econ. 2007 Oct;16(10):1091-107
pubmed: 17294495
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1137-1149
pubmed: 28493626
Eur J Cancer. 2009 May;45(7):1188-1192
pubmed: 19138512
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;20(7):945-948
pubmed: 30771033
BMC Med. 2017 Dec 08;15(1):216
pubmed: 29221453
Health Econ. 2011 Aug;20(8):985-1008
pubmed: 20945339
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Aug 29;7(1):30
pubmed: 28853062
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Nov;19(8):1067-1086
pubmed: 29453763
Health Econ. 2011 Apr;20(4):379-400
pubmed: 20232289
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 May 30;5:223-34
pubmed: 23807855
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2017 Mar;17(1):29-50
pubmed: 28477293
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Jan;38(1):1-4
pubmed: 31828737
Health Econ. 1999 Sep;8(6):485-96
pubmed: 10544314
J Health Econ. 2008 May;27(3):603-23
pubmed: 18164773
Health Policy. 2013 Jun;111(1):34-42
pubmed: 23597871
Health Policy. 2012 Sep;107(1):1-10
pubmed: 22682763
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Oct;17(4):197-205
pubmed: 23038709
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 06;10(3):e0119035
pubmed: 25746728
J Econ Perspect. 1992 Summer;6(3):3-21
pubmed: 10128078
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Dec;12(6):623-33
pubmed: 25141830
J Health Econ. 2018 Jan;57:60-74
pubmed: 29182935
J Health Econ. 2019 Dec;68:102226
pubmed: 31521026