Achalasia subtypes can be identified with functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry using a supervised machine learning process.
dysphagia
endoscopy
impedance
manometry
peristalsis
Journal
Neurogastroenterology and motility
ISSN: 1365-2982
Titre abrégé: Neurogastroenterol Motil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9432572
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
31
03
2020
revised:
28
05
2020
accepted:
09
06
2020
pubmed:
2
7
2020
medline:
1
12
2021
entrez:
2
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Achalasia subtypes on high-resolution manometry (HRM) prognosticate treatment response and help direct management plan. We aimed to utilize parameters of distension-induced contractility and pressurization on functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry and machine learning to predict HRM achalasia subtypes. One hundred eighty adult patients with treatment-naïve achalasia defined by HRM per Chicago Classification (40 type I, 99 type II, 41 type III achalasia) who underwent FLIP panometry were included: 140 patients were used as the training cohort and 40 patients as the test cohort. FLIP panometry studies performed with 16-cm FLIP assemblies were retrospectively analyzed to assess distensive pressure and distension-induced esophageal contractility. Correlation analysis, single tree, and random forest were adopted to develop classification trees to identify achalasia subtypes. Intra-balloon pressure at 60 mL fill volume, and proportions of patients with absent contractile response, repetitive retrograde contractile pattern, occluding contractions, sustained occluding contractions (SOC), contraction-associated pressure changes >10 mm Hg all differed between HRM achalasia subtypes and were used to build the decision tree-based classification model. The model identified spastic (type III) vs non-spastic (types I and II) achalasia with 90% and 78% accuracy in the train and test cohorts, respectively. Achalasia subtypes I, II, and III were identified with 71% and 55% accuracy in the train and test cohorts, respectively. Using a supervised machine learning process, a preliminary model was developed that distinguished type III achalasia from non-spastic achalasia with FLIP panometry. Further refinement of the measurements and more experience (data) may improve its ability for clinically relevant application.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Achalasia subtypes on high-resolution manometry (HRM) prognosticate treatment response and help direct management plan. We aimed to utilize parameters of distension-induced contractility and pressurization on functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry and machine learning to predict HRM achalasia subtypes.
METHODS
One hundred eighty adult patients with treatment-naïve achalasia defined by HRM per Chicago Classification (40 type I, 99 type II, 41 type III achalasia) who underwent FLIP panometry were included: 140 patients were used as the training cohort and 40 patients as the test cohort. FLIP panometry studies performed with 16-cm FLIP assemblies were retrospectively analyzed to assess distensive pressure and distension-induced esophageal contractility. Correlation analysis, single tree, and random forest were adopted to develop classification trees to identify achalasia subtypes.
KEY RESULTS
Intra-balloon pressure at 60 mL fill volume, and proportions of patients with absent contractile response, repetitive retrograde contractile pattern, occluding contractions, sustained occluding contractions (SOC), contraction-associated pressure changes >10 mm Hg all differed between HRM achalasia subtypes and were used to build the decision tree-based classification model. The model identified spastic (type III) vs non-spastic (types I and II) achalasia with 90% and 78% accuracy in the train and test cohorts, respectively. Achalasia subtypes I, II, and III were identified with 71% and 55% accuracy in the train and test cohorts, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES
Using a supervised machine learning process, a preliminary model was developed that distinguished type III achalasia from non-spastic achalasia with FLIP panometry. Further refinement of the measurements and more experience (data) may improve its ability for clinically relevant application.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32608147
doi: 10.1111/nmo.13932
pmc: PMC7775338
mid: NIHMS1617396
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13932Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P01 DK117824
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001422
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74
pubmed: 25469569
Gastroenterology. 2018 Aug;155(2):327-336
pubmed: 29733830
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Jul;27(7):981-9
pubmed: 25898916
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 5;381(23):2219-2229
pubmed: 31800987
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011 Jan;17(1):48-53
pubmed: 21369491
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 May;32(5):e13794
pubmed: 31919949
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1726-1735
pubmed: 27725650
Ann Surg. 2016 Sep;264(3):508-17
pubmed: 27513156
Gastroenterology. 2008 Nov;135(5):1526-33
pubmed: 18722376
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018 Mar 1;314(3):G334-G340
pubmed: 29351396
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1807-16
pubmed: 21561346
Gastroenterology. 2013 Apr;144(4):718-25; quiz e13-4
pubmed: 23277105
Gut. 2016 May;65(5):732-9
pubmed: 26614104
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Aug;24(8):e356-63
pubmed: 22716041
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;17(4):674-681.e1
pubmed: 30081222
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Jun;25(6):496-501
pubmed: 23413801
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Nov;14(11):1635-45
pubmed: 20830530
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1238-49; quiz 1250
pubmed: 23877351
Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec;149(7):1742-51
pubmed: 26278501
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan;103(1):27-37
pubmed: 17900331