Exploring the Roles of Green Food Consumption and Social Trust in the Relationship between Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Psychological Wellbeing.
China
green food consumption
perceived consumer effectiveness
psychological wellbeing
social ideal theory
social trust theory
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 06 2020
29 06 2020
Historique:
received:
11
06
2020
revised:
26
06
2020
accepted:
27
06
2020
entrez:
3
7
2020
pubmed:
3
7
2020
medline:
21
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Green food consumption is a core issue that contributes to solving environmental pollution and achieving sustainable development. This study aims to investigate the mediating role of green food consumption and social trust in the relationship between perceived consumer effectiveness and psychological wellbeing to provide new insights into green food consumption, based on social ideal theory and social trust theory. Using a sample data of 514 consumers in China, the results of structural equation modeling showed that perceived consumer effectiveness was positively related to psychological wellbeing. Furthermore, green food consumption mediated the relationship between perceived consumer effectiveness and psychological wellbeing. In addition, social trust moderated the relationship between perceived consumer effectiveness and green food consumption. Social trust also moderated the indirect effect of perceived consumer effectiveness on psychological wellbeing through green food consumption. The findings of this study enrich the extant literature relating to green food consumption and have practical implications for business managers and policymakers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32610596
pii: ijerph17134676
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134676
pmc: PMC7369759
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):1-22
pubmed: 17402809
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Oct;69(4):719-27
pubmed: 7473027
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5
pubmed: 16367493
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903
pubmed: 14516251
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 29;17(3):
pubmed: 32013260
J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Jun;43(2):207-22
pubmed: 12096700
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227
pubmed: 26821081
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Apr 30;289:113045
pubmed: 32388418