The Challenge of Sustaining Long-term Care in Aging Societies: Lessons From Japan and Spain Comment on "Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan".
Cash Benefits
Informal Care
Japan
Long-term Care
Spain
Journal
International journal of health policy and management
ISSN: 2322-5939
Titre abrégé: Int J Health Policy Manag
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101619905
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2020
01 12 2020
Historique:
received:
06
10
2019
accepted:
15
12
2019
pubmed:
3
7
2020
medline:
7
5
2021
entrez:
3
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This article compares the provision of long-term care (LTC) in Japan and Spain, two countries with similar demographic structures but which address the provision of LTCs in very different ways. Both countries provide universal LTC. However, Japan has developed a generous benefit package of formal services for dependents to alleviate the care burden on the family, but provides no cash benefits. In Spain, on the other hand, cash allowances are the norm rather than the exception in the practical implementation of LTC services. After discussing the necessary delineation of LTC in response to future sociodemographic challenges, we discuss LTC system characteristics and the recent cost containment reforms implemented in Japan and Spain. Finally, we consider the lessons that may be drawn from each country's experience and the reforms that must be undertaken in order ensure the sustainability of LTC provision in other countries with incipient or more developed LTC systems. In addition, since Japan and Spain are both faced with challenging demographic projections, it is important for each country to learn from the other's initiatives and reforms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32610768
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.143
pmc: PMC7947648
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
520-523Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Références
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1213-1223
pubmed: 29626266
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Mar;35(3):331-345
pubmed: 27848219
Gac Sanit. 2017 Jan - Feb;31(1):23-29
pubmed: 27856017
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2009 May-Jun;83(3):379-92
pubmed: 19701570
Health Policy. 2016 Oct;120(10):1177-1182
pubmed: 27667653
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Apr;13(2):223-31
pubmed: 25761544
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):303-316
pubmed: 30121870
J Health Econ. 2018 Mar;58:43-66
pubmed: 29408154
Health Policy. 2019 Jun;123(6):582-589
pubmed: 31000215
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 May 29;8(8):462-466
pubmed: 31441285
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Jul;22(7):897-902
pubmed: 29068697
Gac Sanit. 2018 Sep - Oct;32(5):411-417
pubmed: 28529098
J Health Econ. 2004 Nov;23(6):1159-80
pubmed: 15556241