Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure.
Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
ISSN: 1520-8524
Titre abrégé: J Acoust Soc Am
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7503051
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
entrez:
3
7
2020
pubmed:
3
7
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Foreign-accented speech recognition is typically tested with linguistically simple materials, which offer a limited window into realistic speech processing. The present study examined the relationship between linguistic structure and talker intelligibility in several sentence-in-noise recognition experiments. Listeners transcribed simple/short and more complex/longer sentences embedded in noise. The sentences were spoken by three talkers of varying intelligibility: one native, one high-, and one low-intelligibility non-native English speakers. The effect of linguistic structure on sentence recognition accuracy was modulated by talker intelligibility. Accuracy was disadvantaged by increasing complexity only for the native and high intelligibility foreign-accented talkers, whereas no such effect was found for the low intelligibility foreign-accented talker. This pattern emerged across conditions: low and high signal-to-noise ratios, mixed and blocked stimulus presentation, and in the absence of a major cue to prosodic structure, the natural pitch contour of the sentences. Moreover, the pattern generalized to a different set of three talkers that matched the intelligibility of the original talkers. Taken together, the results in this study suggest that listeners employ qualitatively different speech processing strategies for low- versus high-intelligibility foreign-accented talkers, with sentence-related linguistic factors only emerging for speech over a threshold of intelligibility. Findings are discussed in the context of alternative accounts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32611135
doi: 10.1121/10.0001194
pmc: PMC7275869
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3765Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC005794
Pays : United States
Références
Int J Audiol. 2018 Mar;57(3):221-229
pubmed: 28826285
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(7):616-34
pubmed: 24047949
Int J Audiol. 2008 Nov;47 Suppl 2:S99-105
pubmed: 19012117
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Oct;25(9):869-92
pubmed: 25405842
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Dec;53(6):1543-54
pubmed: 20699339
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb;137(2):884-97
pubmed: 25698021
Lang Speech. 2010;53(Pt 4):510-40
pubmed: 21313992
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Oct;42(5):1148-56
pubmed: 10515512
Front Syst Neurosci. 2013 Jul 13;7:31
pubmed: 23874273
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Mar;21(3):153-62
pubmed: 20211119
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1654-71
pubmed: 24405186
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Feb;83(2):729-40
pubmed: 3351131
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):444-55
pubmed: 20649238
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Apr;97(4):2540-51
pubmed: 7714272
Am J Psychol. 1961 Mar;74:80-5
pubmed: 13697030
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jul;27(7):515-26
pubmed: 27406659
Phonetica. 1978;35(3):125-56
pubmed: 674387
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Dec;112(6):3004-13
pubmed: 12509022
J Commun Disord. 2003 Nov-Dec;36(6):449-64
pubmed: 12967739
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Oct;106(4 Pt 1):2074-85
pubmed: 10530030
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Feb;141(2):886
pubmed: 28253679
Psychol Sci. 1994 Jan 1;5(1):42-46
pubmed: 21526138
Front Psychol. 2015 May 12;6:546
pubmed: 26029129
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Sep 18;60(9):2725-2739
pubmed: 28800370
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):618-27
pubmed: 23862836
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Jun;53(3):588-608
pubmed: 20008681
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Apr;25(2):741-53
pubmed: 23136147
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):435-43
pubmed: 20649237
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Sep;22(5):1166-83
pubmed: 8926483
J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Dec 1;274:131-140
pubmed: 27751892
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jan;24(1):26-36
pubmed: 23231814
Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):707-29
pubmed: 17532315
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jun;26(6):582-94
pubmed: 26134725
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Sep;27(8):647-60
pubmed: 27564442
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Aug;97(1):11-20
pubmed: 14604018
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Mar;19(2):309-28
pubmed: 8454963
Percept Psychophys. 1999 Feb;61(2):206-19
pubmed: 10089756
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):3152-60
pubmed: 21110610
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):708-15
pubmed: 9701963
Psychol Rev. 1992 Jan;99(1):122-49
pubmed: 1546114
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jul;136(1):382-8
pubmed: 24993222
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 May;20(3):521-33
pubmed: 8207370
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):1085-99
pubmed: 8132902
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jan;80(1):222-241
pubmed: 28975549
Lang Speech. 2004;47(Pt 2):139-54
pubmed: 15581189
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
pubmed: 19185386
Lang Speech. 1997 Apr-Jun;40 ( Pt 2):141-201
pubmed: 9509577
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Sep;122(3):1765
pubmed: 17927436
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446
pubmed: 19884961
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):761-70
pubmed: 21424185
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2139-52
pubmed: 21973368