Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Introduction to the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee Recommendations.
Consensus conference
Delphi method
Guidelines
LSS, Lumbar spinal stenosis
Lumbar spinal stenosis
Spinal surgeon
WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies
Journal
World neurosurgery: X
ISSN: 2590-1397
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg X
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101747743
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
13
01
2020
accepted:
25
02
2020
entrez:
3
7
2020
pubmed:
3
7
2020
medline:
3
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative disease that every spine surgeon will come across in daily practice. Despite this, the natural history and treatment have not been well established and standardized as yet, and there have been few guidelines published on this topic to date. The aim of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Society Spine Committee Consensus Conference is to define evidence-based and expert-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of LSS, considering the different possibilities and facilities in countries worldwide. An international committee of spinal surgeons reunited to perform the Consensus Conference on the topic of LSS. The Delphi method was applied to administer a questionnaire and obtain a consensus on various topics. A multidisciplinary committee defined 6 panels: 1) natural course and diagnosis of LSS; 2) conservative treatment and follow-up; 3) percutaneous techniques; 4) decompressive surgery; 5) fusion surgery; 6) mobility preserving surgery. The statements and the literature review were presented and voted. A total of 44 statements were stated and then voted by 16 experienced spine surgeons to obtain the final results. A total of 36 statements reached a consensus, of which 34 reached a positive consensus and 2 a negative consensus, whereas no consensus was reached in 8 cases. In the absence of evidence-based medicine, these recommendations offer support for all practitioners, independent from economic resources and personal experience. Obviously, further studies are needed and will be well accepted to support or modify these recommendations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32613188
doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2020.100075
pii: S2590-1397(20)30006-5
pii: 100075
pmc: PMC7322795
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100075Informations de copyright
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):744-6
pubmed: 23830298
Pain Pract. 2019 Mar;19(3):250-274
pubmed: 30369003
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):425
pubmed: 28851418
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jul;21(1):62-6
pubmed: 24980587
Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(Suppl 6):925-945
pubmed: 30151805
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15
pubmed: 11095242
Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(Suppl 6):915-924
pubmed: 30151804
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9
pubmed: 24581294
Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(Suppl 6):901-914
pubmed: 30151811
Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):734-43
pubmed: 23830297
Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(Suppl 6):786-795
pubmed: 30151808
Eur Spine J. 2019 Jun;28(6):1386-1396
pubmed: 31098717
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;41(2):95-105
pubmed: 21420149