Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy.


Journal

The Journal of urology
ISSN: 1527-3792
Titre abrégé: J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376374

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 3 7 2020
medline: 25 11 2020
entrez: 3 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy which reveals no cancer may impart reassurance beyond that offered by ultrasound guided biopsy. However, followup of men after a negative magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy has been mostly by prostate specific antigen testing and reports of followup tissue confirmation are few. We investigated the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in such men who, because of persistent cancer suspicion, subsequently underwent a repeat magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Subjects were all men with a negative initial magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy who underwent at least 1 further magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy due to continued clinical suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (September 2009 to July 2019). Biopsies were magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion with targeted and systematic cores. Regions of interest from initial magnetic resonance imaging and any new regions of interest at followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy were targeted. The primary end point was detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater). Of 2,716 men 733 had a negative initial magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Study subjects were 73/733 who underwent followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Median (IQR) age and prostate specific antigen density were 64 years (59-67) and 0.12 ng/ml/cc (0.08-0.17), respectively. Baseline PI-RADS® scores were 3 or greater in 74%. At followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy (median 2.4 years, IQR 1.3-3.6), 17/73 (23%) were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer. When followup magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lesion (PI-RADS 3 or greater), clinically significant prostate cancer was found in 17/53 (32%). When followup magnetic resonance imaging was negative (PI-RADS less than 3), cancer was not found (0/20) (p <0.01). Overall 54% of men with PI-RADS 5 at followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer. Men with negative magnetic resonance imaging following an initial negative magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy are unlikely to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer and may avoid repeat biopsy. However, when lesions are seen on followup magnetic resonance imaging, repeat magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy is warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32614257
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001232
doi:

Types de publication

Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1180-1186

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA218547
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA195505
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Adam Kinnaird (A)

Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Vidit Sharma (V)

Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Ryan Chuang (R)

Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Alan Priester (A)

Department of Bioengineering, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Elizabeth Tran (E)

Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Danielle E Barsa (DE)

Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Merdie Delfin (M)

Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Lorna Kwan (L)

Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Anthony Sisk (A)

Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Ely Felker (E)

Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California.

Leonard S Marks (LS)

Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH