Elderly people and responses to COVID-19 in 27 Countries.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 19 05 2020
accepted: 19 06 2020
entrez: 3 7 2020
pubmed: 3 7 2020
medline: 16 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Amongst the most robust consensus related to the COVID-19 disease is that the elderly are by far the most vulnerable population group. Hence, public authorities target older people in order to convince them to comply with preventive measures. However, we still know little about older people's attitudes and compliance toward these measures. In this research, I aim to improve our understanding of elderly people's responses to the pandemic using data from 27 countries. Results are surprising and quite troubling. Elderly people's response is substantially similar to their fellow citizens in their 50's and 60's. This research (i) provides the first thorough description of the most vulnerable population's attitudes and compliance in a comparative perspective (ii) suggest that governments' strategies toward elderly people are far from successful and (iii) shows that methodologically, we should be more cautious in treating age as having a linear effect on COVID-19 related outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32614889
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235590
pii: PONE-D-20-14858
pmc: PMC7332014
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0235590

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

YouGov provided the datasets pro bono to Imperial College London and the Institute of Global Health Innovation. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Références

Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56794
pubmed: 23437239
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 12;14:442
pubmed: 24884433
Can Geriatr J. 2020 Mar 01;23(1):152-154
pubmed: 32550953
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233329
pubmed: 32437377
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 10;15:878
pubmed: 26357923
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 5;117(18):9696-9698
pubmed: 32300018
BMJ. 2020 Mar 26;368:m1198
pubmed: 32217618

Auteurs

J-F Daoust (JF)

School of Social and Political Science, Politics and International Relations, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Center for the Study of Democratic Citizenship, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH