Should we still monitor QTc duration in frail older patients on low-dose haloperidol? A prospective observational cohort study.
corrected QT interval
delirium
frailty
haloperidol
older people
Journal
Age and ageing
ISSN: 1468-2834
Titre abrégé: Age Ageing
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0375655
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 08 2020
24 08 2020
Historique:
received:
02
04
2019
pubmed:
3
7
2020
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
3
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Haloperidol at high dosage is associated with QTc prolongation and polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia but the effects of low-dose haloperidol remain unknown. To evaluate the effects of low-dose haloperidol on QTc-duration in frail hospitalized elderly patients with delirium. A prospective observational study including hospitalized patients aged ≥70 years with Groningen Frailty Index-score > 3. We included 150 patients who received haloperidol and 150 age- and frailty-matched control patients. Serial ECG recordings were performed at hospital admission and during hospitalization. QT-interval was corrected according to Framingham (QTc). Patients were grouped according to baseline QTc in normal (nQTc), borderline (bQTc) or abnormal (aQTc). Primary outcome was change in QTc-duration between first and second ECG. Potentially dangerous QTc was defined as QTc >500 ms or an increase of >50 ms. Patients in the haloperidol group (48% male, mean age 85y, nQT n = 98, bQT n = 31, aQT n = 20) received an average dose of 1.5 mg haloperidol per 24 hours. QTc decreased in patients with borderline (mean - 15 ± 29 ms, P < 0.05) or abnormal (-19 ± 27 ms, P < 0.05) QTc at baseline, no patients developed dangerous QTc-duration. In the control group (41% male, mean age 84y, nQT n = 99 bQT n = 29, aQT n = 22) QTc decreased to a similar extent (bQT -7 ± 16 ms, aQTc -23 ± 20 ms). A trend to QTc shortening was seen, especially in patients with borderline or abnormal QTc at baseline, regardless of haloperidol use. These findings suggest that ECG monitoring of frail elderly patients who receive low-dose haloperidol, may not be necessary.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Haloperidol at high dosage is associated with QTc prolongation and polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia but the effects of low-dose haloperidol remain unknown.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effects of low-dose haloperidol on QTc-duration in frail hospitalized elderly patients with delirium.
METHODS
A prospective observational study including hospitalized patients aged ≥70 years with Groningen Frailty Index-score > 3. We included 150 patients who received haloperidol and 150 age- and frailty-matched control patients. Serial ECG recordings were performed at hospital admission and during hospitalization. QT-interval was corrected according to Framingham (QTc). Patients were grouped according to baseline QTc in normal (nQTc), borderline (bQTc) or abnormal (aQTc). Primary outcome was change in QTc-duration between first and second ECG. Potentially dangerous QTc was defined as QTc >500 ms or an increase of >50 ms.
RESULTS
Patients in the haloperidol group (48% male, mean age 85y, nQT n = 98, bQT n = 31, aQT n = 20) received an average dose of 1.5 mg haloperidol per 24 hours. QTc decreased in patients with borderline (mean - 15 ± 29 ms, P < 0.05) or abnormal (-19 ± 27 ms, P < 0.05) QTc at baseline, no patients developed dangerous QTc-duration. In the control group (41% male, mean age 84y, nQT n = 99 bQT n = 29, aQT n = 22) QTc decreased to a similar extent (bQT -7 ± 16 ms, aQTc -23 ± 20 ms).
CONCLUSION
A trend to QTc shortening was seen, especially in patients with borderline or abnormal QTc at baseline, regardless of haloperidol use. These findings suggest that ECG monitoring of frail elderly patients who receive low-dose haloperidol, may not be necessary.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32614955
pii: 5837829
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa066
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antipsychotic Agents
0
Haloperidol
J6292F8L3D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
829-836Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.