Daily Pad Usage Versus the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form for Continence Assessment Following Radical Prostatectomy.
Assessment
Questionnaires
Radical prostatectomy
Urinary incontinence
Journal
International neurourology journal
ISSN: 2093-4777
Titre abrégé: Int Neurourol J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101534513
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
02
07
2019
accepted:
20
04
2020
entrez:
4
7
2020
pubmed:
4
7
2020
medline:
4
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Continence assessment is an essential component of follow-up after radical prostatectomy (RP). Several methods exist to assess the severity of urinary incontinence (UI). Our study examined the relationship and degree of agreement between International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF) scores and the number of pads used in a 24-hour period in the assessment of UI following RP. Continence was prospectively assessed in 746 men from a Spanish urology clinic 12 months after RP using the ICIQ-SF and pad usage. The relationship between ICIQ-SF scores and pad usage was assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. The Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test was used to determine whether the ICIQ-SF score and the component question scores increased with increasing pad usage. The Bonferroni-corrected pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine which pairs of pad usage levels differed. The weighted kappa was used to evaluate the agreement between pad usage levels and ICIQ-SF questions. The continence rate was 82% using the "no pad usage" definition of continence versus 78% using the definition of an ICIQ-SF score of 0 (P<0.001). Strong positive correlations were observed between the number of pads and the ICIQ-SF total and component question scores (rs>0.85, P<0.001). The ICIQ-SF total and component question scores increased significantly with increasing pad usage (P<0.001). The ICIQ-SF scores (P<0.018) for all pairs of pad usage levels (0, 1, 2, or 3 or more) differed significantly. The agreement between the ICIQ-SF leakage amount question and pad usage was very good (rs=0.861, P<0.001). At 12 months post-RP, 24-hour pad usage was closely correlated with ICIQ-SF, although the continence rate differed depending on the definition used. Higher levels of pad usage were associated with higher questionnaire scores, more leakage, and poor quality of life (interference with everyday life).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32615678
pii: inj.1938116.058
doi: 10.5213/inj.1938116.058
pmc: PMC7332826
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
156-162Références
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Oct;3(4-5):364-376
pubmed: 29174616
Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Feb 26;19(3):21
pubmed: 29479637
BJU Int. 2013 Nov;112(7):936-43
pubmed: 23937206
BMC Urol. 2013 Dec 01;13:67
pubmed: 24289104
J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):836-42
pubmed: 24650425
Neurourol Urodyn. 1994;13(3):261-5
pubmed: 7920683
Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322-30
pubmed: 15227649
J Endourol. 2015 Jun;29(6):683-90
pubmed: 25347698
J Urol. 2003 Aug;170(2 Pt 1):512-5
pubmed: 12853811
Arch Esp Urol. 2015 Nov;68(9):692-700
pubmed: 26530866
World J Urol. 2018 Mar;36(3):349-355
pubmed: 29214353
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jul;6(Suppl 2):S59-S63
pubmed: 28791222
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116(4):577-83
pubmed: 25682782
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):417-425
pubmed: 28586158
Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):3-7
pubmed: 17080415
J Endourol. 2015 Sep;29(9):1044-51
pubmed: 26176381
Yonago Acta Med. 2017 Mar 09;60(1):52-55
pubmed: 28331422
J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1464-8
pubmed: 20171689
J Urol. 2010 Sep;184(3):1028-33
pubmed: 20643426
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61
pubmed: 18354103
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E67-75
pubmed: 23795800
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):433-477
pubmed: 30681183
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jan;57(1):3-13
pubmed: 26966721
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):726-733
pubmed: 30576037
Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905
pubmed: 11113727
Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49
pubmed: 12559262
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Sep;37(7):2263-2270
pubmed: 29566265
J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):865-72
pubmed: 21788038
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 May;13(5):E125-E131
pubmed: 30332593
Eur Urol Focus. 2016 Aug;2(3):245-259
pubmed: 28723370
Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Mar;38(2):71-7
pubmed: 24120839