Genome-wide analyses of chromatin interactions after the loss of Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III.


Journal

Genome biology
ISSN: 1474-760X
Titre abrégé: Genome Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100960660

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 07 2020
Historique:
received: 22 01 2020
accepted: 08 06 2020
entrez: 4 7 2020
pubmed: 4 7 2020
medline: 7 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The relationship between transcription and the 3D chromatin structure is debated. Multiple studies have shown that transcription affects global Cohesin binding and 3D genome structures. However, several other studies have indicated that inhibited transcription does not alter chromatin conformations. We provide the most comprehensive evidence to date to demonstrate that transcription plays a relatively modest role in organizing the local, small-scale chromatin structures in mammalian cells. We show degraded Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III proteins in mESCs cause few or no changes in large-scale 3D chromatin structures, selected RNA polymerases with a high abundance of binding sites or active promoter-associated interactions appear to be relatively more affected after the degradation, transcription inhibition alters local, small loop domains, as indicated by high-resolution chromatin interaction maps, and loops with bound Pol II but without Cohesin or CTCF are identified and found to be largely unchanged after transcription inhibition. Interestingly, Pol II depletion for a longer time significantly affects the chromatin accessibility and Cohesin occupancy, suggesting that RNA polymerases are capable of affecting the 3D genome indirectly. These direct and indirect effects explain the previous inconsistent findings on the influence of transcription inhibition on the 3D genome. We conclude that Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III loss alters local, small-scale chromatin interactions in mammalian cells, suggesting that the 3D chromatin structures are pre-established and relatively stable.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The relationship between transcription and the 3D chromatin structure is debated. Multiple studies have shown that transcription affects global Cohesin binding and 3D genome structures. However, several other studies have indicated that inhibited transcription does not alter chromatin conformations.
RESULTS
We provide the most comprehensive evidence to date to demonstrate that transcription plays a relatively modest role in organizing the local, small-scale chromatin structures in mammalian cells. We show degraded Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III proteins in mESCs cause few or no changes in large-scale 3D chromatin structures, selected RNA polymerases with a high abundance of binding sites or active promoter-associated interactions appear to be relatively more affected after the degradation, transcription inhibition alters local, small loop domains, as indicated by high-resolution chromatin interaction maps, and loops with bound Pol II but without Cohesin or CTCF are identified and found to be largely unchanged after transcription inhibition. Interestingly, Pol II depletion for a longer time significantly affects the chromatin accessibility and Cohesin occupancy, suggesting that RNA polymerases are capable of affecting the 3D genome indirectly. These direct and indirect effects explain the previous inconsistent findings on the influence of transcription inhibition on the 3D genome.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III loss alters local, small-scale chromatin interactions in mammalian cells, suggesting that the 3D chromatin structures are pre-established and relatively stable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32616013
doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02067-3
pii: 10.1186/s13059-020-02067-3
pmc: PMC7331254
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases EC 2.7.7.6

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

158

Références

Nat Methods. 2018 Feb 28;15(3):155-156
pubmed: 29489746
Nature. 2016 Jun 30;534(7609):652-7
pubmed: 27309802
Genome Biol. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):54
pubmed: 29690904
Genome Res. 2017 Jul;27(7):1139-1152
pubmed: 28536180
Mol Cell. 2015 Apr 16;58(2):216-31
pubmed: 25818644
Cell. 2017 Oct 5;171(2):305-320.e24
pubmed: 28985562
Cell. 2017 Dec 14;171(7):1573-1588.e28
pubmed: 29224777
Cell. 2018 May 17;173(5):1165-1178.e20
pubmed: 29706548
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Oct;35(10):940-950
pubmed: 28922346
Cell. 2018 Sep 6;174(6):1522-1536.e22
pubmed: 30146161
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W160-5
pubmed: 27079975
Cell. 2014 Dec 18;159(7):1665-80
pubmed: 25497547
Mol Cell. 2019 Jun 20;74(6):1110-1122
pubmed: 31226276
Cell. 2015 Aug 13;162(4):900-10
pubmed: 26276636
Nature. 2010 Sep 23;467(7314):430-5
pubmed: 20720539
Science. 2015 Nov 20;350(6263):978-81
pubmed: 26516199
Annu Rev Biophys. 2018 May 20;47:425-446
pubmed: 29792819
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 24;116(39):19431-19439
pubmed: 31506350
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Oct 14;17(11):661-678
pubmed: 27739532
Nature. 2013 Sep 12;501(7466):227-31
pubmed: 23883933
Stem Cell Reports. 2013 Oct 24;1(5):371-8
pubmed: 24286025
Mol Biol (Mosk). 2016 May-Jun;50(3):496-503
pubmed: 27414788
Nat Methods. 2016 Nov;13(11):919-922
pubmed: 27643841
Genes Dev. 2015 Oct 1;29(19):1992-7
pubmed: 26443845
Genome Res. 2015 Apr;25(4):582-97
pubmed: 25752748
Mol Cell. 2020 Jan 16;77(2):294-309.e9
pubmed: 31784358
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016 Sep 6;23(9):771-7
pubmed: 27605205
Genome Biol. 2015 Apr 14;16:77
pubmed: 25886366
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Oct 6;33:265-289
pubmed: 28783961
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Sep;20(9):503-519
pubmed: 31160792
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019 Jun;20(6):327-337
pubmed: 30886333
Cell Rep. 2020 Apr 14;31(2):107503
pubmed: 32294452
Nat Genet. 2011 Jun 19;43(7):630-8
pubmed: 21685913
Cell. 2013 Apr 11;153(2):320-34
pubmed: 23582323
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017 Apr;18(4):263-273
pubmed: 28248323
Nature. 2013 Nov 14;503(7475):290-4
pubmed: 24141950
Cell. 2017 May 18;169(5):930-944.e22
pubmed: 28525758
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Mar 31;43(6):e35
pubmed: 25223787
EMBO J. 2009 Sep 2;28(17):2583-600
pubmed: 19629037
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 Mar-Apr;1829(3-4):342-60
pubmed: 23153826
Cell. 2013 Jun 6;153(6):1281-95
pubmed: 23706625
Genome Res. 2018 Feb;28(2):192-202
pubmed: 29273625
Nature. 2014 Aug 7;512(7512):96-100
pubmed: 25043061
Annu Rev Biochem. 2018 Jun 20;87:51-73
pubmed: 29589958
Cell. 2017 Jul 13;170(2):367-381.e20
pubmed: 28709003
Cell. 2013 Apr 11;153(2):307-19
pubmed: 23582322
Mol Cell. 2020 May 21;78(4):765-778.e7
pubmed: 32298650
Cell Res. 2016 Dec;26(12):1345-1348
pubmed: 27886167
Cell. 2017 Apr 6;169(2):216-228.e19
pubmed: 28388407
Nature. 2017 Apr 6;544(7648):110-114
pubmed: 28355183
Nature. 2017 Jul 12;547(7662):232-235
pubmed: 28703188
Cell Rep. 2019 Mar 12;26(11):2890-2903.e3
pubmed: 30865881
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Oct;13(10):720-31
pubmed: 22986266
Cell. 2019 Aug 22;178(5):1145-1158.e20
pubmed: 31402173
Genome Biol. 2008;9(9):R137
pubmed: 18798982
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Cell. 2016 Nov 17;167(5):1188-1200
pubmed: 27863240
Cell Rep. 2016 Nov 15;17(8):2042-2059
pubmed: 27851967
Cell Rep. 2017 Feb 7;18(6):1366-1382
pubmed: 28178516
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Dec;19(12):789-800
pubmed: 30367165
Sci Adv. 2019 Apr 10;5(4):eaaw1668
pubmed: 30989119
Nature. 2019 May;569(7756):345-354
pubmed: 31092938
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 24;112(12):3841-6
pubmed: 25755260
Trends Cell Biol. 2014 Nov;24(11):703-11
pubmed: 25218583
Cell. 2012 Jan 20;148(1-2):84-98
pubmed: 22265404
Nature. 2009 Nov 5;462(7269):58-64
pubmed: 19890323
Nat Methods. 2009 Dec;6(12):917-22
pubmed: 19915560
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 9;45(1):e4
pubmed: 27625391
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010 May;17(5):635-40
pubmed: 20418883
Cell Rep. 2016 Apr 5;15(1):210-218
pubmed: 27052166
Nature. 2012 Apr 11;485(7398):376-80
pubmed: 22495300
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019 Sep;20(9):535-550
pubmed: 31197269
Transcription. 2011 May;2(3):103-108
pubmed: 21922053
EMBO J. 2012 Jan 18;31(2):330-50
pubmed: 22085927
Nature. 2011 Dec 14;480(7378):490-5
pubmed: 22170606
Cell. 2015 Dec 17;163(7):1611-27
pubmed: 26686651
Mol Cell. 2017 Sep 7;67(5):837-852.e7
pubmed: 28826674
Methods. 2020 Jan 1;170:38-47
pubmed: 31442560
Genome Biol. 2015 Dec 01;16:259
pubmed: 26619908
Cell. 2017 Oct 19;171(3):557-572.e24
pubmed: 29053968
J Cell Biol. 2019 May 6;218(5):1511-1530
pubmed: 30824489
Biochem Soc Trans. 2016 Oct 15;44(5):1367-1375
pubmed: 27911719
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 21;111(3):996-1001
pubmed: 24335803
Nature. 2017 Apr 27;544(7651):503-507
pubmed: 28424523
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 29;108(48):19252-7
pubmed: 22084091
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Aug;20(8):437-455
pubmed: 31086298
Science. 2013 Nov 22;342(6161):948-53
pubmed: 24200812
Mol Cell. 2020 May 7;78(3):539-553.e8
pubmed: 32213323
Cell. 2016 Mar 10;164(6):1110-1121
pubmed: 26967279
Nature. 1969 Oct 18;224(5216):234-7
pubmed: 5344598

Auteurs

Yongpeng Jiang (Y)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Jie Huang (J)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Kehuan Lun (K)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Boyuan Li (B)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Haonan Zheng (H)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Yuanjun Li (Y)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Rong Zhou (R)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Wenjia Duan (W)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Chenlu Wang (C)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Yuanqing Feng (Y)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Hong Yao (H)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Cheng Li (C)

Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, School of Life Sciences, Center for Statistical Science, Center for Bioinformatics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Xiong Ji (X)

Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China. xiongji@pku.edu.cn.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH