A phase II single-arm study of pembrolizumab with enzalutamide in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing on enzalutamide alone.
biomarkers
combination
drug therapy
immunotherapy
lymphocytes
prostatic neoplasms
tumor
tumor-infiltrating
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
accepted:
20
04
2020
entrez:
4
7
2020
pubmed:
4
7
2020
medline:
21
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Checkpoint inhibitors can induce profound anticancer responses, but programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibition monotherapy has shown minimal activity in prostate cancer. A published report showed that men with prostate cancer who were resistant to the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide had increased programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on circulating antigen-presenting cells. We hypothesized that the addition of PD-1 inhibition in these patients could induce a meaningful cancer response. We evaluated enzalutamide plus the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in a single-arm phase II study of 28 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mprogressing on enzalutamide alone. Pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenous was given every 3 weeks for four doses with enzalutamide. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of ≥50%. Secondary endpoints were objective response, PSA progression-free survival (PFS), time to subsequent treatment, and time to death. Baseline tumor biopsies were obtained when feasible, and samples were sequenced and evaluated for the expression of PD-L1, microsatellite instability (MSI), mutational and neoepitope burdens. Five (18%) of 28 patients had a PSA decline of ≥50%. Three (25%) of 12 patients with measurable disease at baseline achieved an objective response. Of the five responders, two continue with PSA and radiographic response after 39.3 and 37.8 months. For the entire cohort, median follow-up was 37 months, and median PSA PFS time was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.8 to 9.9 months). Time to subsequent treatment was 7.21 months (95% CI: 5.1 to 11.1 months). Median overall survival for all patients was 21.9 months (95% CI: 14.7 to 28 .4 months), versus 41.7 months (95% CI: 22.16 to not reached (NR)) in the responders. Of the three responders with baseline biopsies, one had MSI high disease with mutations consistent with DNA-repair defects. None had detectable PD-L1 expression. Pembrolizumab has activity in mCRPC when added to enzalutamide. Responses were deep and durable and did not require tumor PD-L1 expression or DNA-repair defects. clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02312557).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Checkpoint inhibitors can induce profound anticancer responses, but programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibition monotherapy has shown minimal activity in prostate cancer. A published report showed that men with prostate cancer who were resistant to the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide had increased programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on circulating antigen-presenting cells. We hypothesized that the addition of PD-1 inhibition in these patients could induce a meaningful cancer response.
METHODS
We evaluated enzalutamide plus the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in a single-arm phase II study of 28 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mprogressing on enzalutamide alone. Pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenous was given every 3 weeks for four doses with enzalutamide. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of ≥50%. Secondary endpoints were objective response, PSA progression-free survival (PFS), time to subsequent treatment, and time to death. Baseline tumor biopsies were obtained when feasible, and samples were sequenced and evaluated for the expression of PD-L1, microsatellite instability (MSI), mutational and neoepitope burdens.
RESULTS
Five (18%) of 28 patients had a PSA decline of ≥50%. Three (25%) of 12 patients with measurable disease at baseline achieved an objective response. Of the five responders, two continue with PSA and radiographic response after 39.3 and 37.8 months. For the entire cohort, median follow-up was 37 months, and median PSA PFS time was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.8 to 9.9 months). Time to subsequent treatment was 7.21 months (95% CI: 5.1 to 11.1 months). Median overall survival for all patients was 21.9 months (95% CI: 14.7 to 28 .4 months), versus 41.7 months (95% CI: 22.16 to not reached (NR)) in the responders. Of the three responders with baseline biopsies, one had MSI high disease with mutations consistent with DNA-repair defects. None had detectable PD-L1 expression.
CONCLUSIONS
Pembrolizumab has activity in mCRPC when added to enzalutamide. Responses were deep and durable and did not require tumor PD-L1 expression or DNA-repair defects.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02312557).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32616555
pii: jitc-2020-000642
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000642
pmc: PMC7333874
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Benzamides
0
Nitriles
0
Phenylthiohydantoin
2010-15-3
enzalutamide
93T0T9GKNU
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02312557']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JG has received research funding from Astellas/Medivation, Merck, Sanofi, Janssen Biotech, and travel support from Sanofi. CD has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS). He has received consulting fees from BMS, Merck, AstraZeneca (AZ) and Medimmune. He has patents licensed to AZ, BMS and Medimmune. WLR has received research grants, consulting fees, and/or royalties from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Galectin Therapeutics, and Nektar Therapeutics. TMB has research funding from Astellas/Medivation, Alliance Foundation Trials, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corcept Therapeutics, Endocyte Inc, Janssen Research & Development, OncoGenex, Sotio, and Theraclone Sciences/OncoResponse. TMB receives consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biotech, Janssen Japan, Merck, and Pfizer and has stock ownership in Salarius Pharmaceuticals, and Arvinas Inc. JJA, GVT, and RS have no conflicts. RCB is a co-owner of Third Coast Therapeutics Inc, which has an option to license patents of which he is an owner. AEM has a sponsored research agreement with AstraZeneca and has received reagents from Genetech. JJA has received consulting fees from Merck.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 10;368(2):138-48
pubmed: 23228172
Genome Res. 2017 May;27(5):801-812
pubmed: 27940952
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30
pubmed: 29313949
Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1807-1813
pubmed: 29992241
Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Apr;14(4):847-56
pubmed: 25695955
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1502-12
pubmed: 15470213
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Dec;18(4):325-32
pubmed: 26260996
Cancer Res. 2012 Dec 15;72(24):6325-32
pubmed: 23222302
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 15;26(6):841-2
pubmed: 20110278
Bioinformatics. 2014 Dec 1;30(23):3310-6
pubmed: 25143287
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Jul;11(7):1003-11
pubmed: 27103510
Memo. 2018;11(4):284-290
pubmed: 30595755
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 18;369(3):213-23
pubmed: 23863050
Cell. 2018 Jun 14;173(7):1770-1782.e14
pubmed: 29906450
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2443-54
pubmed: 22658127
Oncotarget. 2015 Jan 1;6(1):234-42
pubmed: 25428917
Am J Pathol. 2018 Jun;188(6):1478-1485
pubmed: 29577933
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Dec 4;6(1):141
pubmed: 30514390
J Vis Exp. 2016 Feb 08;(108):e53485
pubmed: 26890325
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 31;371(5):424-33
pubmed: 24881730
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 26;364(21):1995-2005
pubmed: 21612468
Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1147-54
pubmed: 20888992
Clin Chem. 2014 Sep;60(9):1192-9
pubmed: 24987110
Nat Commun. 2014 Sep 25;5:4988
pubmed: 25255306
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):40-47
pubmed: 28034081
Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):381-3
pubmed: 23374810
Bioinformatics. 2020 Feb 1;36(3):713-720
pubmed: 31424527
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):700-12
pubmed: 24831977
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 29;363(5):411-22
pubmed: 20818862
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1187-97
pubmed: 22894553
Oncotarget. 2018 Jun 19;9(47):28561-28571
pubmed: 29983880
Nat Med. 2016 Nov;22(11):1342-1350
pubmed: 27694933