Thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series.
complications
experimental pig model
irreversible electroporation
microwave ablation
mild hyperthermia
numerical treatment planning
radiofrequency ablation
therapy
tissue ablation
Journal
Journal of clinical and translational research
ISSN: 2424-810X
Titre abrégé: J Clin Transl Res
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101667205
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
02
02
2020
revised:
05
03
2020
accepted:
07
03
2020
entrez:
4
7
2020
pubmed:
4
7
2020
medline:
4
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
First, the aim of the study was to determine whether irreversible electroporation (IRE) is associated with heat generation in the liver and pancreas at clinical (≤1,500 V/cm) and supraclinical (>1,500 V/cm) electroporation settings; second, to assess the risk of thermal tissue damage in and adjacent to the treated volume in highly perfused versus moderately perfused parts of both organs; third, to investigate the influence of perfusion and of the presence and the orientation of a metal stent on the maximal thermal elevation (ΔT The aims were investigated in 12 case studies conducted in five female Landrace pigs. Several IRE settings were applied for lateral (2), triangular (3), and rectangular (4) electrode configurations in the liver hilum, liver periphery, pancreas head, and pancreas tail. IRE series of 10-90 pulses were applied with pulse durations that varied from 70 μs to 90 μs and electric field strengths between 1,200 V/cm and 3,000 V/cm. In select cases, a metal stent was positioned in the bile duct at the level of the liver hilum. Temperatures were measured before, during, and after IRE in and adjacent to the treatment volumes using fiber optical temperature probes (temperature at the nucleation centers) and digital thermography (surface temperature). The occurrence of thermal damage was assumed to be at temperatures above 50 °C (ΔT The median baseline temperature was 31.6 °C-36.3 °C. ΔT Depending on IRE settings and tissue type, IRE is capable of inducing considerable heating in the liver and pancreas that is sufficient to cause thermal tissue damage. More significant temperature elevations are positively correlated with increasing number of electrode pairs, electric field strength, and pulse number. Temperature elevations can be further exacerbated by the presence and orientation of metal stents. Temperature elevations at the nucleation centers are not always reflected in the organ's surface temperature. Heat sink effects caused by large vessels were minimal in some instances, possibly due to reduced blood flow caused by anesthesia. Appropriate IRE settings must be chosen based on the tissue type and the presence of stents to avoid thermal damage in healthy peritumoral tissue and to protect anatomical structures [Table: see text].
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
109-132Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
Références
Physiol Meas. 2009 May;30(5):459-66
pubmed: 19349647
Circ Res. 1988 Aug;63(2):409-14
pubmed: 3396159
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Dec 04;63(23):235026
pubmed: 30511647
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 1;7(9):e015810
pubmed: 28864693
Ann Biomed Eng. 2009 Dec;37(12):2615-25
pubmed: 19757056
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Aug;6(4):295-300
pubmed: 17668936
Radiology. 2013 Dec;269(3):738-47
pubmed: 23847254
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):433-43
pubmed: 26703782
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015 May;72(1):37-41
pubmed: 25416583
Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 22;10(1):899
pubmed: 30796212
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:4170-4173
pubmed: 30441274
J Vis Surg. 2015 Jun 01;1:4
pubmed: 29075594
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 18;7(1):11767
pubmed: 28924200
Comput Biol Med. 2015 Feb;57:182-6
pubmed: 25575184
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2015 Jun;14(3):331-3
pubmed: 26063038
Acta Radiol Short Rep. 2014 Dec 03;3(11):2047981614556409
pubmed: 25535573
Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):44-55
pubmed: 29806513
Int J Hyperthermia. 2003 Jan-Feb;19(1):89-101
pubmed: 12519714
Ann Biomed Eng. 2005 Feb;33(2):223-31
pubmed: 15771276
J Vis Exp. 2009 Nov 19;(33):
pubmed: 19927116
Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1113-21
pubmed: 24961953
Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):953-963
pubmed: 31542973
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun;38(3):736-41
pubmed: 25159215
Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;42(6):467-92
pubmed: 25955712
Med Eng Phys. 2017 Aug;46:63-70
pubmed: 28647287
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 04;11(2):e0148457
pubmed: 26844550
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 29;10(7):e0134301
pubmed: 26222431
Int J Hyperthermia. 2014 Aug;30(5):335-47
pubmed: 25144823
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jan;43(1):84-93
pubmed: 31385006
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Sep;27(9):1441-1450.e2
pubmed: 27475242
Radiology. 2017 Feb;282(2):585-597
pubmed: 27604035
PLoS One. 2015 May 05;10(5):e0125591
pubmed: 25941806
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015 Nov 27;467(4):736-41
pubmed: 26482855
BMC Cancer. 2016 May 05;16:299
pubmed: 27150293
Prostate. 2015 Feb 15;75(3):332-5
pubmed: 25327875
Sci Rep. 2015 Feb 16;5:8485
pubmed: 25684630
Gut Liver. 2010 Sep;4 Suppl 1:S99-S104
pubmed: 21103304
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Feb 16;6(2):e21
pubmed: 28209559
Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):462-70
pubmed: 23169795
Radiology. 2010 May;255(2):426-33
pubmed: 20413755