Achieving accurate estimates of fetal gestational age and personalised predictions of fetal growth based on data from an international prospective cohort study: a population-based machine learning study.
Journal
The Lancet. Digital health
ISSN: 2589-7500
Titre abrégé: Lancet Digit Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101751302
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
7
2020
pubmed:
4
7
2020
medline:
4
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Preterm birth is a major global health challenge, the leading cause of death in children under 5 years of age, and a key measure of a population's general health and nutritional status. Current clinical methods of estimating fetal gestational age are often inaccurate. For example, between 20 and 30 weeks of gestation, the width of the 95% prediction interval around the actual gestational age is estimated to be 18-36 days, even when the best ultrasound estimates are used. The aims of this study are to improve estimates of fetal gestational age and provide personalised predictions of future growth. Using ultrasound-derived, fetal biometric data, we developed a machine learning approach to accurately estimate gestational age. The accuracy of the method is determined by reference to exactly known facts pertaining to each fetus-specifically, intervals between ultrasound visits-rather than the date of the mother's last menstrual period. The data stem from a sample of healthy, well-nourished participants in a large, multicentre, population-based study, the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). The generalisability of the algorithm is shown with data from a different and more heterogeneous population (INTERBIO-21st Fetal Study). In the context of two large datasets, we estimated gestational age between 20 and 30 weeks of gestation with 95% confidence to within 3 days, using measurements made in a 10-week window spanning the second and third trimesters. Fetal gestational age can thus be estimated in the 20-30 weeks gestational age window with a prediction interval 3-5 times better than with any previous algorithm. This will enable improved management of individual pregnancies. 6-week forecasts of the growth trajectory for a given fetus are accurate to within 7 days. This will help identify at-risk fetuses more accurately than currently possible. At population level, the higher accuracy is expected to improve fetal growth charts and population health assessments. Machine learning can circumvent long-standing limitations in determining fetal gestational age and future growth trajectory, without recourse to often inaccurately known information, such as the date of the mother's last menstrual period. Using this algorithm in clinical practice could facilitate the management of individual pregnancies and improve population-level health. Upon publication of this study, the algorithm for gestational age estimates will be provided for research purposes free of charge via a web portal. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Office of Science (US Department of Energy), US National Science Foundation, and National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.
Sections du résumé
Background
Preterm birth is a major global health challenge, the leading cause of death in children under 5 years of age, and a key measure of a population's general health and nutritional status. Current clinical methods of estimating fetal gestational age are often inaccurate. For example, between 20 and 30 weeks of gestation, the width of the 95% prediction interval around the actual gestational age is estimated to be 18-36 days, even when the best ultrasound estimates are used. The aims of this study are to improve estimates of fetal gestational age and provide personalised predictions of future growth.
Methods
Using ultrasound-derived, fetal biometric data, we developed a machine learning approach to accurately estimate gestational age. The accuracy of the method is determined by reference to exactly known facts pertaining to each fetus-specifically, intervals between ultrasound visits-rather than the date of the mother's last menstrual period. The data stem from a sample of healthy, well-nourished participants in a large, multicentre, population-based study, the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). The generalisability of the algorithm is shown with data from a different and more heterogeneous population (INTERBIO-21st Fetal Study).
Findings
In the context of two large datasets, we estimated gestational age between 20 and 30 weeks of gestation with 95% confidence to within 3 days, using measurements made in a 10-week window spanning the second and third trimesters. Fetal gestational age can thus be estimated in the 20-30 weeks gestational age window with a prediction interval 3-5 times better than with any previous algorithm. This will enable improved management of individual pregnancies. 6-week forecasts of the growth trajectory for a given fetus are accurate to within 7 days. This will help identify at-risk fetuses more accurately than currently possible. At population level, the higher accuracy is expected to improve fetal growth charts and population health assessments.
Interpretation
Machine learning can circumvent long-standing limitations in determining fetal gestational age and future growth trajectory, without recourse to often inaccurately known information, such as the date of the mother's last menstrual period. Using this algorithm in clinical practice could facilitate the management of individual pregnancies and improve population-level health. Upon publication of this study, the algorithm for gestational age estimates will be provided for research purposes free of charge via a web portal.
Funding
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Office of Science (US Department of Energy), US National Science Foundation, and National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32617525
doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30131-X
pii: S2589-7500(20)30131-X
pmc: PMC7323599
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Pagination
e368-e375Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Investigateurs
S Norris
(S)
S E Abbott
(SE)
A Abubakar
(A)
J Acedo
(J)
I Ahmed
(I)
F Al-Aamri
(F)
J Al-Abduwani
(J)
J Al-Abri
(J)
D Alam
(D)
E Albernaz
(E)
H Algren
(H)
F Al-Habsi
(F)
M Alija
(M)
H Al-Jabri
(H)
H Al-Lawatiya
(H)
B Al-Rashidiya
(B)
D G Altman
(DG)
W K Al-Zadjali
(WK)
H F Andersen
(HF)
L Aranzeta
(L)
S Ash
(S)
M Baricco
(M)
F C Barros
(FC)
H Barsosio
(H)
C Batiuk
(C)
M Batra
(M)
J Berkley
(J)
E Bertino
(E)
M K Bhan
(MK)
B A Bhat
(BA)
Z A Bhutta
(ZA)
I Blakey
(I)
S Bornemeier
(S)
A Bradman
(A)
M Buckle
(M)
O Burnham
(O)
F Burton
(F)
A Capp
(A)
V I Cararra
(VI)
R Carew
(R)
V I Carrara
(VI)
A A Carter
(AA)
M Carvalho
(M)
P Chamberlain
(P)
Ismail L Cheikh
(IL)
L Cheikh Ismail
(L)
A Choudhary
(A)
S Choudhary
(S)
W C Chumlea
(WC)
C Condon
(C)
L A Corra
(LA)
C Cosgrove
(C)
R Craik
(R)
M F da Silveira
(MF)
D Danelon
(D)
T de Wet
(T)
E de Leon
(E)
S Deshmukh
(S)
G Deutsch
(G)
J Dhami
(J)
Nicola P Di
(NP)
M Dighe
(M)
H Dolk
(H)
M Domingues
(M)
D Dongaonkar
(D)
D Enquobahrie
(D)
B Eskenazi
(B)
F Farhi
(F)
M Fernandes
(M)
D Finkton
(D)
S Fonseca
(S)
I O Frederick
(IO)
M Frigerio
(M)
P Gaglioti
(P)
C Garza
(C)
G Gilli
(G)
P Gilli
(P)
M Giolito
(M)
F Giuliani
(F)
J Golding
(J)
M G Gravett
(MG)
S H Gu
(SH)
Y Guman
(Y)
Y P He
(YP)
L Hoch
(L)
S Hussein
(S)
D Ibanez
(D)
C Ioannou
(C)
N Jacinta
(N)
N Jackson
(N)
Y A Jaffer
(YA)
S Jaiswal
(S)
J M Jimenez-Bustos
(JM)
F R Juangco
(FR)
L Juodvirsiene
(L)
M Katz
(M)
B Kemp
(B)
S Kennedy
(S)
M Ketkar
(M)
V Khedikar
(V)
M Kihara
(M)
J Kilonzo
(J)
C Kisiang'ani
(C)
J Kizidio
(J)
C L Knight
(CL)
H E Knight
(HE)
N Kunnawar
(N)
A Laister
(A)
A Lambert
(A)
A Langer
(A)
T Lephoto
(T)
A Leston
(A)
T Lewis
(T)
H Liu
(H)
S Lloyd
(S)
P Lumbiganon
(P)
S Macauley
(S)
E Maggiora
(E)
C Mahorkar
(C)
M Mainwaring
(M)
L Malgas
(L)
A Matijasevich
(A)
K McCormick
(K)
R McGready
(R)
R Miller
(R)
A Min
(A)
A Mitidieri
(A)
V Mkrtychyan
(V)
B Monyepote
(B)
D Mota
(D)
I Mulik
(I)
S Munim
(S)
D Muninzwa
(D)
N Musee
(N)
S Mwakio
(S)
H Mwangudzah
(H)
R Napolitano
(R)
C R Newton
(CR)
V Ngami
(V)
J A Noble
(JA)
S Norris
(S)
T Norris
(T)
F Nosten
(F)
K Oas
(K)
M Oberto
(M)
L Occhi
(L)
R Ochieng
(R)
E O Ohuma
(EO)
E Olearo
(E)
I Olivera
(I)
M G Owende
(MG)
C Pace
(C)
Y Pan
(Y)
R Y Pang
(RY)
A T Papageorghiou
(AT)
B Patel
(B)
V Paul
(V)
W Paulsene
(W)
F Puglia
(F)
M Purwar
(M)
V Rajan
(V)
A Raza
(A)
D Reade
(D)
J Rivera
(J)
D A Rocco
(DA)
F Roseman
(F)
S Roseman
(S)
C Rossi
(C)
P M Rothwell
(PM)
I Rovelli
(I)
K Saboo
(K)
R Salam
(R)
M Salim
(M)
L Salomon
(L)
Luna M Sanchez
(LM)
J Sande
(J)
I Sarris
(I)
S Savini
(S)
I K Sclowitz
(IK)
A Seale
(A)
J Shah
(J)
M Sharps
(M)
C Shembekar
(C)
Y J Shen
(YJ)
M Shorten
(M)
F Signorile
(F)
A Singh
(A)
S Sohoni
(S)
A Somani
(A)
T K Sorensen
(TK)
A Soria-Frisch
(A)
E Staines Urias
(E)
A Stein
(A)
W Stones
(W)
V Taori
(V)
K Tayade
(K)
T Todros
(T)
R Uauy
(R)
A Varalda
(A)
M Venkataraman
(M)
C Victora
(C)
J Villar
(J)
S Vinayak
(S)
S Waller
(S)
L Walusuna
(L)
J H Wang
(JH)
L Wang
(L)
S Wanyonyi
(S)
D Weatherall
(D)
S Wiladphaingern
(S)
A Wilkinson
(A)
D Wilson
(D)
M H Wu
(MH)
Q Q Wu
(QQ)
K Wulff
(K)
D Yellappan
(D)
Y Yuan
(Y)
S Zaidi
(S)
G Zainab
(G)
J J Zhang
(JJ)
Y Zhang
(Y)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Références
BJOG. 2013 Sep;120 Suppl 2:33-7, v
pubmed: 23841486
Nature. 2016 Apr 28;532(7600):471-5
pubmed: 27121840
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 21;3:CD004454
pubmed: 28321847
Contraception. 2004 Oct;70(4):289-92
pubmed: 15451332
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Oct;2(10):781-92
pubmed: 25009082
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998 Jan;52 Suppl 1:S5-15
pubmed: 9511014
BJOG. 2013 Sep;120 Suppl 2:9-26, v
pubmed: 23678873
Fertil Steril. 2009 Feb;91(2):522-7
pubmed: 18433748
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;52(3):332-339
pubmed: 28718938
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;21 Suppl 2:86-96
pubmed: 17803622
Front Public Health. 2017 Apr 04;5:66
pubmed: 28421178
Semin Perinatol. 2013 Oct;37(5):307-9
pubmed: 24176152
Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2162-72
pubmed: 22682464
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;28(12):893-900
pubmed: 30293920
Gates Open Res. 2019 Feb 5;2:49
pubmed: 31172050
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e37-e46
pubmed: 30389451
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD004945
pubmed: 22696345
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 14;109(7):2222-7
pubmed: 22308430
BJOG. 2013 Sep;120 Suppl 2:27-32, v
pubmed: 23841904
Science. 2018 Jun 8;360(6393):1133-1136
pubmed: 29880692
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;31(4):388-96
pubmed: 18348183
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;48(6):719-726
pubmed: 26924421
Lancet. 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):869-79
pubmed: 25209488
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):433-441
pubmed: 28697101
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Feb;36(2):171-181
pubmed: 24518917
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):e150-e154
pubmed: 28426621