Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer.
Monitoring
Oligometastatic prostate cancer
PERCIST
PET/CT
PSMA ligand
Polymetastatic prostate cancer
Prostate cancer
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)
RECIST
Journal
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
27
05
2020
accepted:
17
06
2020
pubmed:
4
7
2020
medline:
29
5
2021
entrez:
4
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is used for (re)staging prostate cancer (PCa) and as a biomarker for evaluating response to therapy, but lacks established response criteria. A panel of PCa experts in nuclear medicine, radiology, and/or urology met on February 21, 2020, in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, to formulate criteria for PSMA PET/CT-based response in patients treated for metastatic PCa and optimal timing to use it. Panelists received thematic topics and relevant literature prior to the meeting. Statements on how to interpret response and progression on therapy in PCa with PSMA PET/CT and when to use it were developed. Panelists voted anonymously on a nine-point scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (9). Median scores described agreement and consensus. PSMA PET/CT consensus statements concerned utility, best timing for performing, criteria for evaluation of response, patients who could benefit, and handling of radiolabeled PSMA PET tracers. Consensus was reached on all statements. PSMA PET/CT can be used before and after any local and systemic treatment in patients with metastatic disease to evaluate response to treatment. Ideally, PSMA PET/CT imaging criteria should categorize patients as responders, patients with stable disease, partial response, and complete response, or as non-responders. Specific clinical scenarios such as oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease deserve special consideration. Adoption of PSMA PET/CT should be supported by indication for appropriate use and precise criteria for interpretation. PSMA PET/CT criteria should categorize patients as responders or non-responders. Specific clinical scenarios deserve special consideration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32617640
doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04934-4
pii: 10.1007/s00259-020-04934-4
pmc: PMC7835167
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
469-476Références
J Nucl Med. 2017 Dec;58(12):1956-1961
pubmed: 28522741
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Apr;45(4):602-612
pubmed: 29185010
J Nucl Med. 2018 Mar;59(3):479-485
pubmed: 28887401
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(Suppl 1):55-66
pubmed: 28361188
Int J Nurs Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):188-94
pubmed: 22435983
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;44(6):1014-1024
pubmed: 28283702
Eur Urol. 2020 Apr;77(4):508-547
pubmed: 32001144
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):e696-e708
pubmed: 30507436
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):78-82
pubmed: 31100231
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Nov;45(12):2045-2054
pubmed: 29980832
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):e18-e28
pubmed: 31908301
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1208-1216
pubmed: 32209449
J Nucl Med. 2019 Jul;60(7):950-954
pubmed: 30552200
J Nucl Med. 2020 Jun;61(6):857-865
pubmed: 31732676
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):783-793
pubmed: 29726071
J Nucl Med. 2020 Sep;61(9):1320-1325
pubmed: 31924729
Clin Nucl Med. 2018 Mar;43(3):213-216
pubmed: 29356735
J Nucl Med. 2020 Aug;61(8):1145-1152
pubmed: 31806776
J Nucl Med. 2018 Mar;59(3):469-478
pubmed: 29123012
J Nucl Med. 2017 Oct;58(10):1545-1552
pubmed: 28687599
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Sep;47(10):2322-2327
pubmed: 32140802
Urol Ann. 2019 Apr-Jun;11(2):155-162
pubmed: 31040600
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Mar;47(3):632-641
pubmed: 31732768
J Nucl Med. 2020 May;61(5):678-682
pubmed: 31806774
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 May;46(5):1063-1072
pubmed: 30569186