Professionalism of Information Management in Health Care: Development and Validation of the Construct and Its Measurement.


Journal

Methods of information in medicine
ISSN: 2511-705X
Titre abrégé: Methods Inf Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0210453

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
entrez: 4 7 2020
pubmed: 4 7 2020
medline: 13 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Against the background of a steadily increasing degree of digitalization in health care, a professional information management (IM) is required to successfully plan, implement, and evaluate information technology (IT). At its core, IM has to ensure a high quality of health data and health information systems to support patient care. The goal of the present study was to define what constitutes professional IM as a construct as well as to propose a reliable and valid measurement instrument. To develop and validate the construct of professionalism of information management (PIM) and its measurement, a stepwise approach followed an established procedure from information systems and behavioral research. The procedure included an analysis of the pertaining literature and expert rounds on the construct and the instrument, two consecutive and comprehensive surveys at the national and international level, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as reliability and validity testing. Professionalism of information management was developed as a construct consisting of the three dimensions of strategic, tactical, and operational IM as well as of the regularity and cyclical phases of IM procedures as the two elements of professionalism. The PIM instrument operationalized the construct providing items that incorporated IM procedures along the three dimensions and cyclical phases. These procedures had to be evaluated against their degree of regularity in the instrument. The instrument proved to be reliable and valid in two consecutive measurement phases and across three countries. It can be concluded that professionalism of information management is a meaningful construct that can be operationalized in a scientifically rigorous manner. Both science and practice can benefit from these developments in terms of improved self-assessment, benchmarking capabilities, and eventually, obtaining a better understanding of health IT maturity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Against the background of a steadily increasing degree of digitalization in health care, a professional information management (IM) is required to successfully plan, implement, and evaluate information technology (IT). At its core, IM has to ensure a high quality of health data and health information systems to support patient care.
OBJECTIVES
The goal of the present study was to define what constitutes professional IM as a construct as well as to propose a reliable and valid measurement instrument.
METHODS
To develop and validate the construct of professionalism of information management (PIM) and its measurement, a stepwise approach followed an established procedure from information systems and behavioral research. The procedure included an analysis of the pertaining literature and expert rounds on the construct and the instrument, two consecutive and comprehensive surveys at the national and international level, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as reliability and validity testing.
RESULTS
Professionalism of information management was developed as a construct consisting of the three dimensions of strategic, tactical, and operational IM as well as of the regularity and cyclical phases of IM procedures as the two elements of professionalism. The PIM instrument operationalized the construct providing items that incorporated IM procedures along the three dimensions and cyclical phases. These procedures had to be evaluated against their degree of regularity in the instrument. The instrument proved to be reliable and valid in two consecutive measurement phases and across three countries.
CONCLUSION
It can be concluded that professionalism of information management is a meaningful construct that can be operationalized in a scientifically rigorous manner. Both science and practice can benefit from these developments in terms of improved self-assessment, benchmarking capabilities, and eventually, obtaining a better understanding of health IT maturity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32620017
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712465
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Validation Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1-e12

Informations de copyright

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Auteurs

Johannes Thye (J)

Health Informatics Research Group, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Moritz Esdar (M)

Health Informatics Research Group, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Jan-David Liebe (JD)

Health Informatics Research Group, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Institute of Medical Informatics, UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria.

Franziska Jahn (F)

Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.

Alfred Winter (A)

Institute of Medical Informatics, UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria.

Ursula Hübner (U)

Health Informatics Research Group, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Articles similaires

Humans Middle Aged Female Male Surveys and Questionnaires
Humans Patient Reported Outcome Measures Neoplasms Electronic Health Records Delivery of Health Care
Adolescent Child Female Humans Male

Classifications MeSH