Motor evoked potentials during revascularization in ischemic stroke predict motor pathway ischemia and clinical outcome.
Intraoperative neuromonitoring
Ischemic stroke
Motor evoked potential
Revascularization
Journal
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1872-8952
Titre abrégé: Clin Neurophysiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100883319
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
25
02
2020
revised:
22
05
2020
accepted:
29
05
2020
pubmed:
6
7
2020
medline:
26
5
2021
entrez:
6
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The relevance of motor evoked potential (MEP) recovery during mechanical endovascular thrombectomy (MT) in patients with ischemic stroke is unclear. We correlated MEP recovery during MT to symptom improvement and to ischemia in eloquent motor areas on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compared the predictive value of MEPs to visual angiographic reperfusion status, classified by modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grading (mTICI). Patients with hemisyndrome and large-vessel occlusion undergoing MT were included (n35, 49% females; 73.9 ± 14.5 years; n31 anterior circulation). MEPs were elicited transcranially and recorded at the abductor pollicis brevis muscle bilaterally throughout the procedure. An MRI was acquired within 7 days after MT. The median door-to-needle time was 3.5 hours. Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at presentation was 16 (7 - 37). Median Modified Rankin Scale score was 4 at day 7 and 3 months. After MT, MEP-recovery occurred in 21 cases after a median time span of 4.5 min [range 2 - 11 min]. Symptom improvement at day 7 (3 months) was noted in 22 (21) cases. Absence of ischemia on postinterventional MRI was noted in 21 cases, 19 of whom showed MEP-recovery. Stratified for symptom improvement at day 7, sensitivity (specificity) of MEP-recovery was 86% (85%) and of mTICI ≥ 2b was 95% (23%). Stratified for absence of ischemia on postinterventional MRI, sensitivity (specificity) of MEP-recovery was 90% (86%) and of mTICI ≥ 2b was of 95% (21%). MEP recovery occurs early after successful endovascular mechanical revascularization and is superior to mTICI grading in predicting postoperative neurological outcome and postoperative motor-pathway ischemia. This is a new, significant and clinically important study since it emphasizes the additional value of MEP monitoring in a field, which has been traditionally unaffiliated with neurophysiological monitoring.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32622586
pii: S1388-2457(20)30362-X
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.05.026
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2307-2314Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Electrophysiological monitoring was conducted on the ISIS system from Inomed Co. No author received compensation from the manufacturer.