Phase I, first-in-human study of futibatinib, a highly selective, irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors.
FGFR inhibitor
TAS-120
futibatinib
pharmacokinetics
safety
Journal
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
24
02
2020
revised:
16
06
2020
accepted:
22
06
2020
pubmed:
6
7
2020
medline:
7
1
2021
entrez:
6
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Futibatinib is an oral, irreversible, highly selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-4 inhibitor with potent preclinical activity against tumors harboring FGFR aberrations. This first-in-human, phase I dose-escalation trial (NCT02052778) evaluates the safety and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of futibatinib in advanced solid tumors. Following a standard 3+3 dose-escalation design, eligible patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies received 8-200 mg futibatinib three times a week (t.i.w.) or 4-24 mg once daily (q.d.). A total of 86 patients were enrolled in the nine t.i.w. (n = 42) and five q.d. cohorts (n = 44); 71 patients (83%) had tumors harboring FGF/FGFR aberrations. Three of nine patients in the 24-mg q.d. cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicities, including grade 3 increases in alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and blood bilirubin (n = 1 each). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 20 mg q.d.; no MTD was defined for the t.i.w. schedule. Across cohorts (n = 86), the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (59%), diarrhea (37%), and constipation (34%); 48% experienced grade 3 TEAEs. TEAEs led to dose interruptions, dose reductions, and treatment discontinuations in 55%, 14%, and 3% of patients, respectively. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional across all q.d. doses but not all t.i.w. doses evaluated, with saturation observed between 80 and 200 mg t.i.w. Serum phosphorus increased dose dependently with futibatinib on both schedules, but a stronger exposure-response relationship was observed with q.d. dosing, supporting 20 mg q.d. as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Overall, partial responses were observed in five patients [FGFR2 fusion-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 3) and FGFR1-mutant primary brain tumor (n = 2)], and stable disease in 41 (48%). Futibatinib treatment resulted in manageable safety, pharmacodynamic activity, and preliminary responses in patients with advanced solid tumors. The results of this phase I dose-escalation trial support 20 mg q.d. futibatinib as the RP2D. FOENIX-101 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02052778).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Futibatinib is an oral, irreversible, highly selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-4 inhibitor with potent preclinical activity against tumors harboring FGFR aberrations. This first-in-human, phase I dose-escalation trial (NCT02052778) evaluates the safety and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of futibatinib in advanced solid tumors.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Following a standard 3+3 dose-escalation design, eligible patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies received 8-200 mg futibatinib three times a week (t.i.w.) or 4-24 mg once daily (q.d.).
RESULTS
A total of 86 patients were enrolled in the nine t.i.w. (n = 42) and five q.d. cohorts (n = 44); 71 patients (83%) had tumors harboring FGF/FGFR aberrations. Three of nine patients in the 24-mg q.d. cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicities, including grade 3 increases in alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and blood bilirubin (n = 1 each). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 20 mg q.d.; no MTD was defined for the t.i.w. schedule. Across cohorts (n = 86), the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (59%), diarrhea (37%), and constipation (34%); 48% experienced grade 3 TEAEs. TEAEs led to dose interruptions, dose reductions, and treatment discontinuations in 55%, 14%, and 3% of patients, respectively. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional across all q.d. doses but not all t.i.w. doses evaluated, with saturation observed between 80 and 200 mg t.i.w. Serum phosphorus increased dose dependently with futibatinib on both schedules, but a stronger exposure-response relationship was observed with q.d. dosing, supporting 20 mg q.d. as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Overall, partial responses were observed in five patients [FGFR2 fusion-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 3) and FGFR1-mutant primary brain tumor (n = 2)], and stable disease in 41 (48%).
CONCLUSIONS
Futibatinib treatment resulted in manageable safety, pharmacodynamic activity, and preliminary responses in patients with advanced solid tumors. The results of this phase I dose-escalation trial support 20 mg q.d. futibatinib as the RP2D.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
FOENIX-101 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02052778).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32622884
pii: S0923-7534(20)39928-2
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.018
pmc: PMC9743148
mid: NIHMS1849738
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
FGFR1 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1
EC 2.7.10.1
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02052778']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1405-1412Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure RB does not have conflicts of interests to disclose. FM-B reports research support from Aileron Therapeutics, Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical, Calithera Biosciences Inc., Curis Inc., CytomX Therapeutics Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Debiopharm International, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Genentech Inc., Guardant Health Inc., K Group, Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Novartis, Pfizer Inc., PPD Investigator Services LLC, Puma Biotechnology Inc., Seattle Genetics, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., and Zymeworks Inc.; has served on the advisory committees of ClearLight Diagnostics, Darwin Health, Grail, Immunomedics, Inflection Biosciences, Mersana Therapeutics, Puma Biotechnology Inc., Seattle Genetics, and Silverback Therapeutics, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals; has a consulting role for eFFECTOR Therapeutics, PACT Pharma, Zymeworks, Jackson Laboratory, Genentech Inc., F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Parexel International, Pfizer Inc., IBM Watson, Samsung Bioepis, Aduro Biotech Inc., Kolon Life Science, OrigiMed, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Seattle Genetics Inc., DebioPharm, Dialectica, Piers Pharmaceuticals, Xencor, and Tyra Biosciences; and has received fees/honoraria from Chugai Biopharmaceuticals, Dialectica, Mayo Clinic, and Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma. LG has a consulting/advisory role for Debiopharm, H3 Biomedicine, Incyte, QED, Alentis, Pieres, Agios, and Sirtex; serves on the IDMC for AstraZeneca; has received research funding from Taiho; and has received reimbursement for travel, accommodation, and other expenses from Taiho. BT has served in an advisory role at Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Sanofi, BMS, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Tolmar, Ipsen; has received research funding from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, and Servier; has served on the Speaker Bureau for Amgen, Astellas, BMS, and Janssen-Cilag; and has received travel expenses from Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, and Sanofi. BT's institution receives funding from Amgen, Aslan, Akeso, AstraZeneca, Aptevo, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Servier, and Taiho. YH, KAB, and IY are full-time employees at Taiho Oncology. KAB was an employee at Eli Lilly and owns stock in Eli Lilly. HTA is an investigator in studies sponsored by Taiho and reports an advisory role in Guardant, Roche, and Servier. IM has no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 May 1;25(9):2699-2707
pubmed: 30745300
Mol Cancer Res. 2010 Nov;8(11):1439-52
pubmed: 21047773
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 20;36(3):276-282
pubmed: 29182496
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):338-348
pubmed: 31340094
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):671-684
pubmed: 32203698
Curr Drug Metab. 2010 Jul;11(6):526-37
pubmed: 20540691
Oncogene. 2013 Jun 20;32(25):3059-70
pubmed: 22869148
Neoplasia. 2013 Aug;15(8):975-88
pubmed: 23908597
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 1;22(1):259-67
pubmed: 26373574
ChemMedChem. 2019 Feb 19;14(4):494-500
pubmed: 30600916
J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Oct;26(10):2486-97
pubmed: 21812026
Hepatology. 2014 Apr;59(4):1427-34
pubmed: 24122810
Cancer Discov. 2017 Mar;7(3):252-263
pubmed: 28034880
Br J Cancer. 2019 Jan;120(2):165-171
pubmed: 30420614