The Identity of Organisms in Scientific Practice: Integrating Historical and Relational Conceptions.

biological identity constraints genealogy mathematical modeling measurement organization variation

Journal

Frontiers in physiology
ISSN: 1664-042X
Titre abrégé: Front Physiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101549006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 20 10 2019
accepted: 15 05 2020
entrez: 7 7 2020
pubmed: 7 7 2020
medline: 7 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We address the identity of biological organisms at play in experimental and modeling practices. We first examine the central tenets of two general conceptions, and we assess their respective strengths and weaknesses. The historical conception, on the one hand, characterizes organisms' identity by looking at their past, and specifically at their genealogical connection with a common ancestor. The relational conception, on the other hand, interprets organisms' identity by referring to a set of distinctive relations between their parts, and between the organism and its environment. While the historical and relational conceptions are understood as opposed and conflicting, we submit that they are also fundamentally complementary. Accordingly, we put forward a hybrid conception, in which historical and relational (and more specifically, organizational) aspects of organisms' identity sustain and justify each other. Moreover, we argue that organisms' identity is not only hybrid but also bounded, insofar as the compliance with specific identity criteria tends to vanish as time passes, especially across generations. We spell out the core conceptual framework of this conception, and we outline an original formal representation. We contend that the hybrid and bounded conception of organisms' identity suits the epistemological needs of biological practices, particularly with regards to the generalization and reproducibility of experimental results, and the integration of mathematical models with experiments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32625111
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00611
pmc: PMC7311753
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

611

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Montévil and Mossio.

Références

Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2016 Oct;122(1):51-57
pubmed: 27431501
Mol Ecol. 2011 Mar;20(5):881-92
pubmed: 21073587
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):711-9
pubmed: 15253356
Q Rev Biol. 2012 Dec;87(4):325-41
pubmed: 23397797
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 02;10:2578
pubmed: 31849738
Curr Mod Biol. 1974 May;5(4):187-96
pubmed: 4407425
Pain. 1999 Mar;80(1-2):67-82
pubmed: 10204719
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2016 Oct;122(1):36-50
pubmed: 27530930
Theor Biol Med Model. 2004 Nov 16;1:13
pubmed: 15546492
Nature. 2016 May 25;533(7604):452-4
pubmed: 27225100
J Theor Biol. 2015 May 7;372:179-91
pubmed: 25752259
Science. 2009 May 22;324(5930):1029-33
pubmed: 19460998
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2016 Oct;122(1):24-35
pubmed: 27521451
Nat Genet. 2005 Nov;37(11):1181-6
pubmed: 16254564
ILAR J. 2014;55(3):399-404
pubmed: 25541542
Cancer Res. 1986 Aug;46(8):3958-63
pubmed: 3089584

Auteurs

Maël Montévil (M)

Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (IHPST, UMR 8590), Université Paris 1 et CNRS, Paris, France.
Centre Pompidou, Institut de Recherche et d'Innovation, Paris, France.

Matteo Mossio (M)

Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (IHPST, UMR 8590), Université Paris 1 et CNRS, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH