Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS-40278-9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829-2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2013-112).

1507 DAS‐40278‐9 GMO MON 89034 NK603 Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 herbicide tolerance insect resistance maize (Zea mays)

Journal

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
Titre abrégé: EFSA J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101642076

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
entrez: 7 7 2020
pubmed: 16 1 2019
medline: 16 1 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS-40278-9 (four-event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 89034, 1507, NK603 and DAS-40278-9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and four of their subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the maize single events or their four subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicates that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four-event stack maize does not give rise to food/feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four-event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non-GM comparator and the non-GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the four-event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the six maize subcombinations for which no experimental data were provided, and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four-event stack maize. No post-market monitoring for food/feed is necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four-event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non-GM comparator and the tested non-GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32626068
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5522
pii: EFS25522
pmc: PMC7009169
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e05522

Informations de copyright

© 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Références

Environ Sci Eur. 2016;28(1):30
pubmed: 28090425
Sci Rep. 2017 May 8;7(1):1560
pubmed: 28484216
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 29;6:283
pubmed: 25972882
Plant Cell. 1995 Jul;7(7):907-919
pubmed: 12242393
EMBO J. 1987 Sep;6(9):2519-23
pubmed: 16453790
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Nov;43 Suppl 2:25-42
pubmed: 24164515
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Sep;62(3):775-806
pubmed: 9729609
Scand J Immunol. 1999 Jun;49(6):578-84
pubmed: 10354369
Transgenic Res. 2009 Aug;18(4):583-94
pubmed: 19225900
Plant Physiol. 1994 May;105(1):159-166
pubmed: 12232195
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Mar;68(3):1137-45
pubmed: 11872461
Gene. 1988 Oct 15;70(1):25-37
pubmed: 3240868

Auteurs

Classifications MeSH