Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × MON 87411 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2017-144).
MIR162
MON 87411
MON 87427
MON 89034
genetically modified organism (GMO)
herbicide tolerant
insect resistant
maize (Zea mays)
Journal
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
Titre abrégé: EFSA J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101642076
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
entrez:
7
7
2020
pubmed:
7
7
2020
medline:
7
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × MON 87411 (four-event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 87427, MON 89034, MIR162 and MON 87411. The genetically modified organism (GMO) Panel previously assessed the four single maize events and four of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the four subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety were identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins and dsRNA in the four-event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four-event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non-GM comparator and the non-GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the four-event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the six maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four-event stack maize. Post-market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four-event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non-GM comparator and tested non-GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32626155
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5848
pii: EFS25848
pmc: PMC7008898
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e05848Informations de copyright
© 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
Références
Toxins (Basel). 2017 Apr 07;9(4):
pubmed: 28387713
Environ Sci Eur. 2016;28(1):30
pubmed: 28090425
Sci Rep. 2017 May 8;7(1):1560
pubmed: 28484216
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Nov;25(11):1322-6
pubmed: 17982443
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 29;6:283
pubmed: 25972882
Plant Cell. 1995 Jul;7(7):907-919
pubmed: 12242393
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016 Mar 02;80(2):329-50
pubmed: 26935135
Plant Cell Rep. 2000 Jul;19(8):798-803
pubmed: 30754872
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Nov;43 Suppl 2:25-42
pubmed: 24164515
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54270
pubmed: 23349844
Transgenic Res. 2009 Aug;18(4):583-94
pubmed: 19225900
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Sep;62(3):775-806
pubmed: 9729609
J Bacteriol. 1967 Nov;94(5):1492-6
pubmed: 4862193
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Feb;73(3):956-61
pubmed: 17122403
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Mar;68(3):1137-45
pubmed: 11872461
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 28;93(11):5389-94
pubmed: 8643585
Scand J Immunol. 1999 Jun;49(6):578-84
pubmed: 10354369
Int Immunopharmacol. 2018 Aug;61:185-196
pubmed: 29886072