Establishment of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma molecular gradient (PAMG) that predicts the clinical outcome of pancreatic cancer.
Adenocarcinoma
/ diagnosis
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Animals
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Cell Line, Tumor
Clinical Trials as Topic
Disease-Free Survival
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
/ genetics
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Female
Fluorouracil
/ adverse effects
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
/ drug effects
Heterografts
Humans
Irinotecan
/ adverse effects
Leucovorin
/ adverse effects
Male
Mice
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Proteins
/ genetics
Oxaliplatin
/ adverse effects
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Precision Medicine
Prognosis
Transcriptome
/ genetics
Young Adult
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Chemosensitivity prediction
Pancreatic cancer
Precision medicine
Prognostic
Transcriptomic signature
Translational medicine
Journal
EBioMedicine
ISSN: 2352-3964
Titre abrégé: EBioMedicine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101647039
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
02
04
2020
revised:
09
06
2020
accepted:
11
06
2020
pubmed:
7
7
2020
medline:
26
5
2021
entrez:
7
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A significant gap in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patient's care is the lack of molecular parameters characterizing tumours and allowing a personalized treatment. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were obtained from 76 consecutive PDAC and classified according to their histology into five groups. A PDAC molecular gradient (PAMG) was constructed from PDX transcriptomes recapitulating the five histological groups along a continuous gradient. The prognostic and predictive value for PMAG was evaluated in: i/ two independent series (n = 598) of resected tumours; ii/ 60 advanced tumours obtained by diagnostic EUS-guided biopsy needle flushing and iii/ on 28 biopsies from mFOLFIRINOX treated metastatic tumours. A unique transcriptomic signature (PAGM) was generated with significant and independent prognostic value. PAMG significantly improves the characterization of PDAC heterogeneity compared to non-overlapping classifications as validated in 4 independent series of tumours (e.g. 308 consecutive resected PDAC, uHR=0.321 95% CI [0.207-0.5] and 60 locally-advanced or metastatic PDAC, uHR=0.308 95% CI [0.113-0.836]). The PAMG signature is also associated with progression under mFOLFIRINOX treatment (Pearson correlation to tumour response: -0.67, p-value < 0.001). PAMG unify all PDAC pre-existing classifications inducing a shift in the actual paradigm of binary classifications towards a better characterization in a gradient. Project funding was provided by INCa (Grants number 2018-078 and 2018-079, BACAP BCB INCa_6294), Canceropole PACA, DGOS (labellisation SIRIC), Amidex Foundation, Fondation de France, INSERM and Ligue Contre le Cancer.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A significant gap in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patient's care is the lack of molecular parameters characterizing tumours and allowing a personalized treatment.
METHODS
METHODS
Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were obtained from 76 consecutive PDAC and classified according to their histology into five groups. A PDAC molecular gradient (PAMG) was constructed from PDX transcriptomes recapitulating the five histological groups along a continuous gradient. The prognostic and predictive value for PMAG was evaluated in: i/ two independent series (n = 598) of resected tumours; ii/ 60 advanced tumours obtained by diagnostic EUS-guided biopsy needle flushing and iii/ on 28 biopsies from mFOLFIRINOX treated metastatic tumours.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
A unique transcriptomic signature (PAGM) was generated with significant and independent prognostic value. PAMG significantly improves the characterization of PDAC heterogeneity compared to non-overlapping classifications as validated in 4 independent series of tumours (e.g. 308 consecutive resected PDAC, uHR=0.321 95% CI [0.207-0.5] and 60 locally-advanced or metastatic PDAC, uHR=0.308 95% CI [0.113-0.836]). The PAMG signature is also associated with progression under mFOLFIRINOX treatment (Pearson correlation to tumour response: -0.67, p-value < 0.001).
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
PAMG unify all PDAC pre-existing classifications inducing a shift in the actual paradigm of binary classifications towards a better characterization in a gradient.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
Project funding was provided by INCa (Grants number 2018-078 and 2018-079, BACAP BCB INCa_6294), Canceropole PACA, DGOS (labellisation SIRIC), Amidex Foundation, Fondation de France, INSERM and Ligue Contre le Cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32629389
pii: S2352-3964(20)30233-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102858
pmc: PMC7334821
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Neoplasm Proteins
0
folfirinox
0
Oxaliplatin
04ZR38536J
Irinotecan
7673326042
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102858Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest The authors declare no competing financial interests
Références
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 07;20(18):
pubmed: 31500324
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 18;10(1):4729
pubmed: 31628300
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 18;11:94
pubmed: 20167110
Cell Rep. 2017 Nov 28;21(9):2458-2470
pubmed: 29186684
Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec;155(6):1999-2013.e3
pubmed: 30165049
Nat Genet. 2020 Feb;52(2):231-240
pubmed: 31932696
Nat Commun. 2018 May 17;9(1):1978
pubmed: 29773832
Nat Genet. 2015 Oct;47(10):1168-78
pubmed: 26343385
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 16;:
pubmed: 31843922
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2011 Dec;20(4):389-96
pubmed: 22187705
Ann Surg. 2020 May;271(5):932-940
pubmed: 30188399
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):882-93
pubmed: 22064622
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Nov 25;1756(2):97-101
pubmed: 16169155
Am J Pathol. 2015 Apr;185(4):1022-32
pubmed: 25765988
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011 Sep;68(18):3033-46
pubmed: 21637948
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):82-92
pubmed: 31754050
Nature. 2016 Mar 3;531(7592):47-52
pubmed: 26909576
Cell Rep. 2014 Nov 20;9(4):1235-45
pubmed: 25456126
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Mar 15;24(6):1344-1354
pubmed: 29288237
Gut. 2020 Feb;69(2):317-328
pubmed: 31201285
Semin Oncol. 2015 Feb;42(1):134-43
pubmed: 25726058