Metacognitive Training for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.


Journal

BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 07 2020
Historique:
received: 04 04 2019
accepted: 04 05 2020
entrez: 8 7 2020
pubmed: 8 7 2020
medline: 22 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A high number of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not receive cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention, which is the most effective treatment for OCD. Therefore, Metacognitive Training for OCD (MCT-OCD) was developed, which is a structured group therapy aiming at the modification of dysfunctional (meta-)cognitive biases, beliefs and coping styles. It can be administered by less trained personnel, thus may reach a higher number of patients. An uncontrolled pilot study (MCT-OCD pilot version) provided first evidence that the training is highly accepted by patients; OC symptoms decreased with a high effect size (η Eighty patients with OCD will be recruited. After a blinded assessment at baseline (-t1), patients will be randomly assigned either to the intervention group (MCT-OCD; n = 40) or to a care as usual control group (n = 40). The MCT-OCD aims to enhance patients' metacognitive competence in eight modules by addressing dysfunctional (meta-)cognitive biases and beliefs associated with OCD (e.g., intolerance of uncertainty). After 8 weeks, patients will be invited to a post assessment (t1), and then they will receive a follow-up online questionnaire 3 months following t1 (t2). The primary outcome is the Y-BOCS total score, and the secondary outcomes include the HDRS, OCI-R, OBQ-44, MCQ-30, WHOQOL-BREF, BDI-II, and subjective appraisal ratings of the MCT-OCD. We expect that OC symptoms will decrease more in the intervention group compared with the care as usual control group from -t1 to t1 and that treatment gains will be maintained until t2. The planned study is the first to investigate the MCT-OCD, a promising new treatment, in a randomized controlled trial. The MCT-OCD may help to overcome existing treatment barriers for patients with OCD. German Registry for Clinical Studies ( DRKS00013539 ), 22.02.2018.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
A high number of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not receive cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention, which is the most effective treatment for OCD. Therefore, Metacognitive Training for OCD (MCT-OCD) was developed, which is a structured group therapy aiming at the modification of dysfunctional (meta-)cognitive biases, beliefs and coping styles. It can be administered by less trained personnel, thus may reach a higher number of patients. An uncontrolled pilot study (MCT-OCD pilot version) provided first evidence that the training is highly accepted by patients; OC symptoms decreased with a high effect size (η
METHODS
Eighty patients with OCD will be recruited. After a blinded assessment at baseline (-t1), patients will be randomly assigned either to the intervention group (MCT-OCD; n = 40) or to a care as usual control group (n = 40). The MCT-OCD aims to enhance patients' metacognitive competence in eight modules by addressing dysfunctional (meta-)cognitive biases and beliefs associated with OCD (e.g., intolerance of uncertainty). After 8 weeks, patients will be invited to a post assessment (t1), and then they will receive a follow-up online questionnaire 3 months following t1 (t2). The primary outcome is the Y-BOCS total score, and the secondary outcomes include the HDRS, OCI-R, OBQ-44, MCQ-30, WHOQOL-BREF, BDI-II, and subjective appraisal ratings of the MCT-OCD. We expect that OC symptoms will decrease more in the intervention group compared with the care as usual control group from -t1 to t1 and that treatment gains will be maintained until t2.
DISCUSSION
The planned study is the first to investigate the MCT-OCD, a promising new treatment, in a randomized controlled trial. The MCT-OCD may help to overcome existing treatment barriers for patients with OCD.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
German Registry for Clinical Studies ( DRKS00013539 ), 22.02.2018.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32631261
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02648-3
pii: 10.1186/s12888-020-02648-3
pmc: PMC7336399
doi:

Banques de données

DRKS
['DRKS00013539']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

350

Références

J Affect Disord. 2016 Oct;203:241-247
pubmed: 27310102
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Apr;42(4):385-96
pubmed: 14998733
World Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;15(1):80-1
pubmed: 26833615
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Sep;45(9):2232-40
pubmed: 17306222
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Aug 30;189(1):1-9
pubmed: 21276619
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Jul;28(7):574-81
pubmed: 21681869
Cogn Behav Ther. 2005;34(3):140-7
pubmed: 16195053
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Feb;119(2):98-106
pubmed: 18822090
Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt B):221-232
pubmed: 26594019
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012 Sep;21(3):169-84
pubmed: 22865617
Compr Psychiatry. 2005 Nov-Dec;46(6):453-9
pubmed: 16275213
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 May;56:17-25
pubmed: 29656823
J Affect Disord. 2011 Jan;128(1-2):175-7
pubmed: 20696481
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;60(12):1234-8
pubmed: 17998077
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;3(8):730-739
pubmed: 27318812
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;39(2):117-32
pubmed: 17418090
Psychother Res. 2020 Apr;30(4):474-486
pubmed: 31072282
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57
pubmed: 9881538
Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(4):231-4
pubmed: 27230865
Nervenarzt. 2007 Jun;78(6):651-6
pubmed: 16832698
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Oct;45(10):2257-67
pubmed: 17521605
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Jul;35(7):667-81
pubmed: 9193129
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(2):209-20
pubmed: 20623925
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;74(7):685-90
pubmed: 23945445
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1973 Feb;40(1):69-77
pubmed: 4569703
Behav Res Ther. 2003 Aug;41(8):863-78
pubmed: 12880642
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Feb;65:5-10
pubmed: 25544403
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(3):394-406
pubmed: 16814981
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Apr;47(4):301-7
pubmed: 19203749
J Affect Disord. 2017 Oct 15;221:17-24
pubmed: 28628763
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):1006-11
pubmed: 2684084
Behav Res Ther. 2001 Aug;39(8):987-1006
pubmed: 11480839
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Aug;40:156-69
pubmed: 26117062
Psychol Assess. 2002 Dec;14(4):485-96
pubmed: 12501574
Schizophr Res. 2018 Nov;201:20-26
pubmed: 29903626
Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310
pubmed: 15085902
Behav Ther. 2011 Sep;42(3):399-412
pubmed: 21658523
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2019 Mar;26(2):227-240
pubmed: 30456821
Cogn Behav Ther. 2019 Mar;48(2):89-105
pubmed: 30088441
Behav Ther. 2019 Jan;50(1):165-176
pubmed: 30661557
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011 May;123(5):387-97
pubmed: 20946200
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 May;22(4):734-49
pubmed: 17913454
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;39(4):451-8
pubmed: 18295186
J Psychol. 2017 Aug 18;151(6):532-546
pubmed: 29077549
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:24-36
pubmed: 28982038
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
pubmed: 14399272
J Anxiety Disord. 2006;20(8):1016-35
pubmed: 16621437
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2018 Apr;15(2):130-139
pubmed: 29489070
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jun;46(12):1569-85
pubmed: 9672396
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2007 Sep-Oct;57(9-10):395-404
pubmed: 17590836
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Nov;43(11):1527-42
pubmed: 16299894
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 10;9:2551
pubmed: 30618972
J Anxiety Disord. 2016 Mar;38:79-87
pubmed: 26851748
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;28(8):1310-25
pubmed: 18701199
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;22(1):40-46
pubmed: 28691550
Behav Res Ther. 1985;23(5):571-83
pubmed: 4051930
Psychol Bull. 1986 Jan;99(1):20-35
pubmed: 2871574
Cogn Behav Ther. 2019 Mar;48(2):162-176
pubmed: 30064295
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Jul;42(4):952-62
pubmed: 26748396
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):532-9
pubmed: 8698947
Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 May;47(3):229-245
pubmed: 28681684
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Dec 20;11:200
pubmed: 22185596
J Anxiety Disord. 2016 May;40:8-17
pubmed: 27061971

Auteurs

Franziska Miegel (F)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. f.miegel@uke.de.

Cüneyt Demiralay (C)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Steffen Moritz (S)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Janina Wirtz (J)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Birgit Hottenrott (B)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Lena Jelinek (L)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH