Multidrug regimens for treatment of older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.


Journal

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN: 1878-3562
Titre abrégé: Dig Liver Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100958385

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 25 02 2020
revised: 03 06 2020
accepted: 04 06 2020
pubmed: 8 7 2020
medline: 18 12 2021
entrez: 8 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Older patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPDAC) are under-represented in clinical trials. Our single-center, retrospective study enrolled MPDAC patients ≥ 70 treated with chemotherapy RESULTS: 105 patients were divided in groups based on the received treatments: 44 gemcitabine or capecitabine monotherapy (A), 34 nabpaclitaxel-gemcitabine (B) 27 4-drugs combinations (gemcitabine, cisplatin, capecitabine plus either nab-paclitaxel or epirubicin or docetaxel) (C). Group A: median age was 78 (70-87) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥80 was found in 84% of patients; Group B: median age 77 (71-84) and KPS ≥ 80 in 88% of patients; Group C: median age 73 (70-78) and KPS ≥ 80 in 93% of patients. Median OS was 7.9, 11.7 and 14.2 months in group A, B and C respectively; 1 and 2-year OS were 27% and 8% in group A; 44% and 5% in group B; 52% and 22% in group C. When lung metastatic only patients were excluded, patients <75 and ≥ 75 had similar OS in group A (6.4 vs 5.6 months) and in group B (12.3 vs 11.1 months). In group B grade 3 thrombocytopenia, fatigue and peripheral neuropathy were more frequent in patients ≥ 75. In older patients, combination chemotherapy shows acceptable feasibility and promising efficacy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Older patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPDAC) are under-represented in clinical trials.
METHODS
Our single-center, retrospective study enrolled MPDAC patients ≥ 70 treated with chemotherapy RESULTS: 105 patients were divided in groups based on the received treatments: 44 gemcitabine or capecitabine monotherapy (A), 34 nabpaclitaxel-gemcitabine (B) 27 4-drugs combinations (gemcitabine, cisplatin, capecitabine plus either nab-paclitaxel or epirubicin or docetaxel) (C). Group A: median age was 78 (70-87) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥80 was found in 84% of patients; Group B: median age 77 (71-84) and KPS ≥ 80 in 88% of patients; Group C: median age 73 (70-78) and KPS ≥ 80 in 93% of patients. Median OS was 7.9, 11.7 and 14.2 months in group A, B and C respectively; 1 and 2-year OS were 27% and 8% in group A; 44% and 5% in group B; 52% and 22% in group C. When lung metastatic only patients were excluded, patients <75 and ≥ 75 had similar OS in group A (6.4 vs 5.6 months) and in group B (12.3 vs 11.1 months). In group B grade 3 thrombocytopenia, fatigue and peripheral neuropathy were more frequent in patients ≥ 75.
CONCLUSIONS
In older patients, combination chemotherapy shows acceptable feasibility and promising efficacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32631650
pii: S1590-8658(20)30269-3
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.06.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

117-121

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest MR reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Celgene; grants and personal fees from Baxalta; grants and personal fees from Merck Serono; grants from Helsinn; and personal fees from Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, NovoCure, Halozyme, Novartis, and Shire. LG reports personal fees from Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Synthon, AstraZeneca, Genomic Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Synaffix, Eli Lilly, Odonate Therapeutics, Sandoz, Onkaido, Oncolytics Biotech, ADC Therapeutics, and Seattle Genetics. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Marina Macchini (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan.

Marta Chiaravalli (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan.

Chiara Pircher (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan.

Silvia Zanon (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan.

Umberto Peretti (U)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan.

Elena Mazza (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan.

Maria Maddalena Valente (MM)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan.

Clara Fugazza (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan.

Luca Gianni (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan.

Michele Reni (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan. Electronic address: reni.michele@hsr.it.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH