State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images.
Adam
brain tumor
convolutional neural network
deep learning
gradient descent
optimizer
segmentation
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jul 2020
03 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
07
06
2020
revised:
22
06
2020
accepted:
01
07
2020
entrez:
9
7
2020
pubmed:
9
7
2020
medline:
9
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Brain tumors have become a leading cause of death around the globe. The main reason for this epidemic is the difficulty conducting a timely diagnosis of the tumor. Fortunately, magnetic resonance images (MRI) are utilized to diagnose tumors in most cases. The performance of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) depends on many factors (i.e., weight initialization, optimization, batches and epochs, learning rate, activation function, loss function, and network topology), data quality, and specific combinations of these model attributes. When we deal with a segmentation or classification problem, utilizing a single optimizer is considered weak testing or validity unless the decision of the selection of an optimizer is backed up by a strong argument. Therefore, optimizer selection processes are considered important to validate the usage of a single optimizer in order to attain these decision problems. In this paper, we provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of popular optimizers of CNN to benchmark the segmentation for improvement. In detail, we perform a comparative analysis of 10 different state-of-the-art gradient descent-based optimizers, namely Adaptive Gradient (Adagrad), Adaptive Delta (AdaDelta), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adaptive Momentum (Adam), Cyclic Learning Rate (CLR), Adaptive Max Pooling (Adamax), Root Mean Square Propagation (RMS Prop), Nesterov Adaptive Momentum (Nadam), and Nesterov accelerated gradient (NAG) for CNN. The experiments were performed on the BraTS2015 data set. The Adam optimizer had the best accuracy of 99.2% in enhancing the CNN ability in classification and segmentation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32635409
pii: brainsci10070427
doi: 10.3390/brainsci10070427
pmc: PMC7407771
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : National Science Foundation of China
ID : 81871394
Organisme : Beijing Municipal Education Committee Science Foundation
ID : KM201810005030
Organisme : Beijing Laboratory of Advanced Information Networks
ID : PXM2019 014204 500029
Références
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):489-505
pubmed: 17255008
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017 Jun 21;19:221-248
pubmed: 28301734
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jul 06;18(7):
pubmed: 29986473
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Oct;34(10):1993-2024
pubmed: 25494501
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Feb 19;21(3):360-369
pubmed: 30649461
Med Image Anal. 2017 Jan;35:18-31
pubmed: 27310171
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2005 Sep;27(9):1485-90
pubmed: 16173190
J Digit Imaging. 2020 May 21;:
pubmed: 32440926
Brain Sci. 2020 Feb 05;10(2):
pubmed: 32033462
Neural Netw. 2019 Feb;110:225-231
pubmed: 30599419
Insights Imaging. 2018 Aug;9(4):611-629
pubmed: 29934920
J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 8;42(11):226
pubmed: 30298337