Measurement of tumor size in early cervical cancer: an ever-evolving paradigm.
Adenocarcinoma
/ classification
Female
Gynecological Examination
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Margins of Excision
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tumor Burden
Ultrasonography
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
cervical cancer
cervix uteri
uterine cervical neoplasms
Journal
International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society
ISSN: 1525-1438
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynecol Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9111626
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
30
03
2020
revised:
25
05
2020
accepted:
02
06
2020
pubmed:
9
7
2020
medline:
10
9
2021
entrez:
9
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The major tenets in accurately assessing tumor size in patients with early stage cervical cancer currently include physical examination, imaging studies, and pathologic evaluation. It is estimated that when comparing clinical stage based on physical examination and final pathology, the concordance diminishes as stage increases: 85.4%, 77.4%, 35.3%, and 20.5% for stage IB1, IB2, IIA, and IIB, respectively. Vaginal involvement and larger tumor diameter are considered the main causes of stage inaccuracy. When considering imaging studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides the highest level of accuracy in the assessment of cervical tumor size. Its accuracy in determining tumor location within the cervix is approximately 91% and in predicting tumor size 93%. MRI imaging is also significantly more accurate in measuring tumor size, delineating cervical tumor boundaries, and local tumor extension when compared with computed tomography (CT) scan. When comparing with pelvic ultrasound, the accuracy of both imaging techniques (MRI and pelvic ultrasound) in the assessment of tumor size in small versus large tumors is comparable. Pertaining to pathology, the depth of invasion should be measured by convention from the nearest surface epithelium, which equates to tumor thickness. In the setting where tumor is found both in the conization and hysterectomy specimen, the horizontal extent should be measured by summing the maximum horizontal measurement in the different specimens and the depth of invasion measured as the maximum depth in either specimen. A new pattern-based classification for endocervical adenocarcinomas recommends the description of patterns of invasion for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related adenocarcinomas as this is associated with differing risks of lymph node involvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32636272
pii: ijgc-2020-001436
doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001436
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1215-1223Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.