Medical Student Attitudes Toward Substance Use Disorders Before and After a Skills-Based Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Curriculum.
addiction
alcohol
brief intervention
drugs
medical education
screening
Journal
Advances in medical education and practice
ISSN: 1179-7258
Titre abrégé: Adv Med Educ Pract
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101562700
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
26
02
2020
accepted:
13
05
2020
entrez:
9
7
2020
pubmed:
9
7
2020
medline:
9
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based framework for assessing and addressing risky substance use. This study evaluated the substance-related attitudes of medical students who participated in an Enhanced Pre-Clinical SBIRT Curriculum designed to reduce stigma, help students empathize with the experiences of people using alcohol and drugs, understand substance use in-context, and feel more optimistic about efforts to prevent and treat substance use disorders (SUDs). Students (N=118; 73.8% of eligible) completed the Attitudes and Opinions Survey for alcohol and drugs before and after this 2-year, multi-modality curriculum. The authors classified attitudes as "positive" or "negative" and grouped students by pre-post attitudinal change: persistently negative, persistently positive, negative-to-positive, positive-to-negative. Using chi-square tests, the authors assessed differences by sex, race/ethnicity, and whether students had a family member or friend with an SUD. Most students (>90%) reported persistently positive attitudes regarding physicians in recovery, societal contributions of patients with SUDs; ability to learn from such patients; and general attitudes toward SUD treatment. This skewed distribution precluded the investigation of subgroup differences. Fewer students reported persistently positive attitudes regarding SUD patients' healthcare utilization (alcohol 58.5%; drug 57.8%) and impact on other patients' care (alcohol 73.7%; drug 72.4%), compared to other attitudinal domains (at p-values < 0.0001 in the McNemar's tests). Approximately, 1 in 5 students reported more negative healthcare utilization attitudes on follow-up. There were no demographic differences in these two attitudinal domains. Unlike previous studies of medical student attitudes, most students who participated in the Enhanced Pre-Clinical SBIRT Curriculum reported an enduring appreciation for the educational and societal contributions of patients with SUDs. Attitudes toward healthcare utilization and the impact of patients with SUDs on the care of other patients were more resistant to change, possibly due to the predominance of acute-care inpatient settings in clinical training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32636697
doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S251391
pii: 251391
pmc: PMC7335270
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
455-461Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : K24 DA029647
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : T32 DA007294
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 Kidd et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr Frances R Levin reports grants from NIDA and SAMHSA; salary support from New York State Psychiatric Institute; a consulting income from Major League Baseball, and non-financial support from US WorldMEDS, outside the submitted work. Dr. Levin was an unpaid member of a Scientific Advisory Board for Alkermes and US WorldMeds but did not personally receive any compensation in the form of cash payments (honoraria/consulting fees) or food/beverage (she declined food/beverages in both circumstances) nor receive compensation in the form of travel reimbursement. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award number T32DA007294. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors report no other possible conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;75(2):211-213
pubmed: 29282472
JAMA. 2014 Aug 6;312(5):502-13
pubmed: 25096690
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 24;2:CD004148
pubmed: 29476653
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jan 1;99(1-3):280-95
pubmed: 18929451
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):322.e1-322.e12
pubmed: 29247636
PLoS Med. 2006 Nov;3(11):e442
pubmed: 17132052
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jan 1;134:92-98
pubmed: 24099970
Am Psychol. 2009 Sep;64(6):527-37
pubmed: 19739882
Addiction. 2006 Jun;101(6):841-9
pubmed: 16696628
JAMA. 1984 Oct 12;252(14):1905-7
pubmed: 6471323
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Oct 1;97(3):226-30
pubmed: 18499355
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2017 Aug 7;12(1):18
pubmed: 28780906
Acad Med. 2001 May;76(5):410-8
pubmed: 11346513
South Med J. 2006 Jan;99(1):28-35
pubmed: 16466119
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):1143-1152
pubmed: 29085549
Acad Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;38(4):420-5
pubmed: 24619913
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2012 Jun;35(2):461-80
pubmed: 22640766