Factors Related to Behavioral Functioning in Mothers of Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Application of Transactional Model of Stress and Coping.
Coping Behaviors
Mothers
Transactional Model of Stress and Coping
Type 1 Diabetes
Journal
International journal of endocrinology and metabolism
ISSN: 1726-913X
Titre abrégé: Int J Endocrinol Metab
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101235597
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
06
05
2018
revised:
17
12
2019
accepted:
01
02
2020
entrez:
9
7
2020
pubmed:
9
7
2020
medline:
9
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Having a child with diabetes creates a great deal of stress for mothers. The transactional model of stress and coping is one of the best conceptual frameworks for stressors. This study aimed to investigate factors related to health promoting behaviors based on transactional model in mothers of children with type 1 diabetes. This study was conducted on 180 mothers of children with type 1 diabetes. The data was collected using a multi-sectional questionnaire including demographic characteristics and questions about the model constructs. Data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 19) and using statistical tests. The highest mean score was related to interpersonal relationships (13.8 ± 4.5) and the lowest was related to stress management (10.8 ± 4.2). Linear regression model showed that mother's education, information seeking, and social support had a positive effect, and primary appraisal and emotion-focused coping had a negative effect on the mother's health promotion behaviors. In the regression model R-square accounts for 53.7% of the variance. The transactional model was an appropriate framework for explaining the coping outcomes in mothers of children with type 1 diabetes. By mothers' attempts to improve attitude about diabetes and reduce their vulnerability, training to use coping strategies, increasing information and inter-sectoral interventions for attracting sufficient support from patients' families can be hopeful in improving mothers' behavioral Functioning.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Having a child with diabetes creates a great deal of stress for mothers. The transactional model of stress and coping is one of the best conceptual frameworks for stressors.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate factors related to health promoting behaviors based on transactional model in mothers of children with type 1 diabetes.
METHODS
METHODS
This study was conducted on 180 mothers of children with type 1 diabetes. The data was collected using a multi-sectional questionnaire including demographic characteristics and questions about the model constructs. Data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 19) and using statistical tests.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The highest mean score was related to interpersonal relationships (13.8 ± 4.5) and the lowest was related to stress management (10.8 ± 4.2). Linear regression model showed that mother's education, information seeking, and social support had a positive effect, and primary appraisal and emotion-focused coping had a negative effect on the mother's health promotion behaviors. In the regression model R-square accounts for 53.7% of the variance.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The transactional model was an appropriate framework for explaining the coping outcomes in mothers of children with type 1 diabetes. By mothers' attempts to improve attitude about diabetes and reduce their vulnerability, training to use coping strategies, increasing information and inter-sectoral interventions for attracting sufficient support from patients' families can be hopeful in improving mothers' behavioral Functioning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32636882
doi: 10.5812/ijem.74356
pmc: PMC7322561
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e74356Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interests: It is not declared by the authors.
Références
Diabetes Educ. 2010 Mar-Apr;36(2):318-25
pubmed: 20410369
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Apr 09;6(3):241-8
pubmed: 24762369
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
J Pediatr Psychol. 2005 Sep;30(6):513-21
pubmed: 16055489
Autism. 2018 Apr;22(3):236-244
pubmed: 27899714
BMC Pediatr. 2010 Jul 15;10:50
pubmed: 20633252
Br J Nurs. 1999 Feb 11-24;8(3):133-9
pubmed: 10222874
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005 Jun;49(Pt 6):405-18
pubmed: 15882391
J Adv Nurs. 2009 May;65(5):992-1000
pubmed: 19399973
Diabetes Educ. 2012 Jul-Aug;38(4):562-79
pubmed: 22581804
Int J Hypertens. 2014;2014:245480
pubmed: 24678414
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2002 Jul-Sep;7(3):93-103
pubmed: 12236249
J Pediatr Nurs. 1996 Apr;11(2):82-93
pubmed: 8935580
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990 Apr;58(2):189-95
pubmed: 2335636
Nurs Res. 2010 Sep-Oct;59(5):348-55
pubmed: 20697308