Analysis of twisted internal carotid arteries in carotid endarterectomy.

Carotid endarterectomy Clinical feature Surgical feature Twisted internal carotid artery

Journal

Surgical neurology international
ISSN: 2229-5097
Titre abrégé: Surg Neurol Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101535836

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 21 12 2019
accepted: 14 05 2020
entrez: 9 7 2020
pubmed: 9 7 2020
medline: 9 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The twisted carotid artery is a variant, in which the internal carotid artery (ICA) courses medially to the external carotid artery. Due to the sparse descriptions in the literature, we, here, report our experience with cases of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for twisted carotid artery and its clinical features. Fifty-seven consecutive CEA-treated patients were evaluated, and the twist angle was measured on the source images of axial slices of computed tomography angiography (CTA). Eight male patients (14.2%) demonstrated a twisted right ICA (mean age, 77.0 ± 2.6 years; and mean stenosis, 66.9% ± 19.9%). The mean twist angle was 30.1° ± 17.9°, while the normal ICA is angled at -23.0° ± 12.3°. No statistical differences in the distribution of coexisting diseases were found between the normal and twisted ICA cases. CEA was successfully performed with the correction of the carotid position in all cases; however, significant position correction was not observed in the postoperative evaluation. Right-side dominancy ( Twisted ICA was preferentially found in the right ICA and men. CEA of the twisted ICA was safely performed with appropriate head rotation and wider longitudinal skin incision than usual without a significant increase in the operative time. CTA is useful for preoperative evaluation. This specific variation should be considered by the neurosurgeon involved in the evaluation and treatment of carotid stenoses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The twisted carotid artery is a variant, in which the internal carotid artery (ICA) courses medially to the external carotid artery. Due to the sparse descriptions in the literature, we, here, report our experience with cases of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for twisted carotid artery and its clinical features.
METHODS METHODS
Fifty-seven consecutive CEA-treated patients were evaluated, and the twist angle was measured on the source images of axial slices of computed tomography angiography (CTA).
RESULTS RESULTS
Eight male patients (14.2%) demonstrated a twisted right ICA (mean age, 77.0 ± 2.6 years; and mean stenosis, 66.9% ± 19.9%). The mean twist angle was 30.1° ± 17.9°, while the normal ICA is angled at -23.0° ± 12.3°. No statistical differences in the distribution of coexisting diseases were found between the normal and twisted ICA cases. CEA was successfully performed with the correction of the carotid position in all cases; however, significant position correction was not observed in the postoperative evaluation. Right-side dominancy (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Twisted ICA was preferentially found in the right ICA and men. CEA of the twisted ICA was safely performed with appropriate head rotation and wider longitudinal skin incision than usual without a significant increase in the operative time. CTA is useful for preoperative evaluation. This specific variation should be considered by the neurosurgeon involved in the evaluation and treatment of carotid stenoses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32637200
doi: 10.25259/SNI_601_2019
pii: SNI-11-147
pmc: PMC7332516
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

147

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Surgical Neurology International.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

Stroke. 2001 Nov;32(11):2522-9
pubmed: 11692011
JAMA. 1995 May 10;273(18):1421-8
pubmed: 7723155
No Shinkei Geka. 2019 Apr;47(4):455-460
pubmed: 31061231
Stroke. 2014 Nov;45(11):3226-30
pubmed: 25228259
Stroke. 2003 Apr;34(4):950-5
pubmed: 12637694
N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 15;325(7):445-53
pubmed: 1852179
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;123:115-22
pubmed: 27637637
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Dec;62(6):1521-8
pubmed: 25499709
Neurosurgery. 1995 Apr;36(4):629-47
pubmed: 7596491
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Dec;158(12):2393-2397
pubmed: 27614435
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2005 Jan;45(1):25-9; discussion 30
pubmed: 15699617
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Nov;13(5):471-4
pubmed: 21873365
Br J Neurosurg. 2004 Apr;18(2):138-48
pubmed: 15176555
Lancet. 1991 May 25;337(8752):1235-43
pubmed: 1674060
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009 Sep-Oct;18(5):349-53
pubmed: 19717017
World Neurosurg. 2010 Mar;73(3):147-54; discussion e21
pubmed: 20860952

Auteurs

Masaru Honda (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, Shunan Memorial Hospital, 1-10-1 Ikunoyaminami, Kudamatsu City, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Hajime Maeda (H)

Department of Neurosurgery, Shunan Memorial Hospital, 1-10-1 Ikunoyaminami, Kudamatsu City, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Classifications MeSH