Primary and secondary perforator-based flap-in-flap reconstructions of postexcisional head and neck soft tissue defects.
Bio-geometry of flap in flap
Perforator based flap in flap
Salvage reconstruction
Journal
JPRAS open
ISSN: 2352-5878
Titre abrégé: JPRAS Open
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101680420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
03
08
2019
accepted:
14
05
2020
entrez:
9
7
2020
pubmed:
9
7
2020
medline:
9
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Perforator-based flap-in-flap (PBFIF) refers to the construct of one flap within another based on a perforator. Primary flap-in-flap is the simultaneous construct of two flaps, one within the other. It is particularly useful in cases where despite perfect planning, the flap does not fit congruently into recesses of the defect. It facilitates tension-free flap inset without the need for secondary movement from adjacent areas. Secondary flap-in-flap is the construction of a flap within a previously transferred settled flap. It is particularly useful in cases of wound dehiscence and partial necrosis, which results in a defect-warranting flap cover, when other flap options are either not feasible or other options have been exhausted. To assess the outcome and define the biogeometry of primary and secondary PBFIFs, which were used in postexcisional head and neck soft tissue defects. Eight patients who underwent flap-in-flap head and neck reconstruction from January 2014 to January 2016 (four cases of primary PBFIF with nasolabial flaps, and four cases of secondary PBFIF with pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps) were retrospectively studied. All were nonsmokers with no associated comorbidities. At the end of the follow-up period, two independent observers and the patient assessed the outcome based on the Institutional Reconstruction Assessment Score (IRAS). All flaps settled well with a mean follow-up of 16.75 months. All flaps were used for the reconstruction of postexcisional defects only. None of the patients had any loco regional recurrences. The mean IRAS obtained in 8 patients was 3.5 (primary PBFIF=3.87 and secondary PBFIF= 3.12). None of the flaps resulted in the late distortion of adjacent anatomical landmarks by hypertrophy or contracture of scars. Flap-in-flap reconstruction (whether primary or secondary) is a useful technique to cover defects where reconstruction without anatomical distortion is required (e.g., face). It is a useful option for a tension-free flap inset. Flap-in-flap reconstruction is a relatively easy adjunct in the salvage reconstructive armamentarium of plastic surgeons.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32637529
doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2020.05.001
pii: S2352-5878(20)30018-8
pmc: PMC7326723
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
30-39Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None.
Références
Br J Plast Surg. 1981 Jan;34(1):3-10
pubmed: 7459521
Clin Plast Surg. 1980 Jan;7(1):3-7
pubmed: 6988143
Ann Plast Surg. 1987 Aug;19(2):103-16
pubmed: 3662343
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 May;66(5):720-2
pubmed: 23021787
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Oct;71(4):365-71
pubmed: 23187715
Br J Plast Surg. 1981 Apr;34(2):215-20
pubmed: 7236984
J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Jan;20(1):198-200
pubmed: 19165026
Clin Plast Surg. 2010 Oct;37(4):615-26, vi
pubmed: 20816517
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977 Aug;60(2):212-20
pubmed: 329302
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Aug;90(2):275-80
pubmed: 1631219
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 May;63(5):e491-3
pubmed: 19297261
Br J Plast Surg. 1985 Apr;38(2):197-207
pubmed: 3886058
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Apr;127(4):1447-59
pubmed: 21460653
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(6):653-7
pubmed: 16716958
Br J Plast Surg. 1988 Jan;41(1):62-7
pubmed: 3345409
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979 Aug;64(2):249
pubmed: 377342
Ann Plast Surg. 1983 Oct;11(4):282-8
pubmed: 6638831
ANZ J Surg. 2003 May;73(5):261
pubmed: 12752277