Parental experiences of uncertainty following an abnormal fetal anomaly scan: Insights using Han's taxonomy of uncertainty.
communication
fetal anomaly
parents
prenatal diagnosis
uncertainty
Journal
Journal of genetic counseling
ISSN: 1573-3599
Titre abrégé: J Genet Couns
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9206865
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
22
04
2020
revised:
05
06
2020
accepted:
15
06
2020
pubmed:
9
7
2020
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
9
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For a number of prospective parents, uncertainty during pregnancy starts when an anomaly is found during a routine fetal anomaly scan. This may be followed by numerous tests to determine the etiology and nature of the anomaly. In this study, we aimed to understand how prospective parents perceive and manage uncertainty after being confronted with a structural anomaly during their routine ultrasound. Han's taxonomy of uncertainty was used as a framework to identify and understand the different types of uncertainty experienced. Interviews were held in the UK (n = 8 women and n = 1 male partner) and in the Netherlands (n = 7 women) with participants who had experienced uncertainty in their pregnancy after a fetal scan. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and the uncertainties experienced by parents were mapped against the dimensions of the Han taxonomy (sources, issues, and locus). Participants' experience of uncertainty was relevant to all dimensions and subcategories of the Han taxonomy, showing its applicability in the prenatal setting. Sources of uncertainty included receiving probabilistic or ambiguous information about the anomaly, or information that was complex and challenging to understand. Issues of uncertainty included were those that were scientific-such as a probable diagnosis with no further information, personal-such as the emotional impact of uncertainty, and practical-such as limited information about medical procedures and practical aspects of care. Additionally, participants described what helped them to manage uncertainty. This included active coping strategies such as searching for information on the Internet, external coping resources such as seeking social support, and internal coping resources such as using positivity and hope. Several recommendations for the healthcare professional to minimize uncertainty and help the patient deal with uncertainty have been proposed based on these findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32638447
doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1311
pmc: PMC8432163
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
198-210Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 211288/Z/18/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Références
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Feb;9(2):86-90
pubmed: 9132261
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015 Jan-Dec;2:
pubmed: 26878030
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;41(3):382-406
pubmed: 28132396
Prenat Diagn. 2017 Dec;37(12):1225-1231
pubmed: 29049852
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 22;14:363
pubmed: 25336335
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Aug 09;14:264
pubmed: 25106057
J Health Commun. 2005 Jan-Feb;10(1):57-76
pubmed: 15764444
Genet Med. 2014 Dec;16(12):977-80
pubmed: 24875302
Qual Health Res. 2016 Dec;26(14):1975-1987
pubmed: 26351292
J Genet Couns. 2021 Feb;30(1):198-210
pubmed: 32638447
Women Birth. 2010 Sep;23(3):111-6
pubmed: 20153992
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012 Jun;3(2):73-8
pubmed: 22578754
Qual Health Res. 2013 Jul;23(7):924-36
pubmed: 23558712
Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):678-684
pubmed: 29392858
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Dec;231:19-24
pubmed: 30317140
Midwifery. 2007 Mar;23(1):13-22
pubmed: 17011088
J Perinatol. 2011 Dec;31(12):760-3
pubmed: 21527908
West J Nurs Res. 2010 Dec;32(8):1011-30
pubmed: 20634402
J Genet Couns. 2019 Apr;28(2):313-325
pubmed: 30636062
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):442-451
pubmed: 31124209
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Oct;38(11):801-811
pubmed: 30035818
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Jan;38(1):10-19
pubmed: 28654730
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):791-801
pubmed: 31955407
Pediatrics. 2016 Sep;138(3):
pubmed: 27485696
Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):v-xxvii, 1-228
pubmed: 21132996
J Genet Couns. 2016 Oct;25(5):1116-26
pubmed: 26940446
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Feb;23(1):1-6
pubmed: 29033309
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 13;6:CD007529
pubmed: 28613398
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153299
pubmed: 27100402
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2175-84
pubmed: 23215555
J Genet Couns. 2019 Apr;28(2):292-303
pubmed: 30741463
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(1):22-30
pubmed: 21654153
Genet Med. 2017 Aug;19(8):918-925
pubmed: 28102863
Genet Med. 2013 Feb;15(2):139-45
pubmed: 22955112
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 15;15:171
pubmed: 26276642
J Med Screen. 2011;18(1):2-7
pubmed: 21536809
Am J Med Genet A. 2010 Sep;152A(9):2193-202
pubmed: 20803642
Birth. 2002 Dec;29(4):225-50
pubmed: 12431263
Med Decis Making. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):828-38
pubmed: 22067431
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Sep;38(10):740-747
pubmed: 29956345
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Jul;40(8):1028-1039
pubmed: 32362033