Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) randomised controlled trial: protocol for a multidimensional process evaluation.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 07 2020
Historique:
entrez: 10 7 2020
pubmed: 10 7 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Primary care interventions are often multicomponent, with several targets (eg, patients and healthcare professionals). Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) is a novel primary care-based model of long-term stroke care involving a review of stroke-related needs, a self-management programme, a direct point of contact in general practice, enhanced communication between care services, and a directory of national and local community services, currently being evaluated in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). Informed by Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions and the Behaviour Change Consortium fidelity framework, this protocol outlines the process evaluation of IPCAS within this RCT. The process evaluation aimed to explore how the intervention was delivered in context and how participants engaged with the intervention. Mixed methods will be used: (1) design: intervention content will be compared with 'usual care'; (2) training: intervention training sessions will be audio/video-recorded where feasible; (3) delivery: healthcare professional self-reports, audio recordings of intervention delivery and observations of My Life After Stroke course (10% of reviews and sessions) will be coded separately; semistructured interviews will be conducted with a purposive sample of healthcare professionals; (4) receipt and (5) enactment: where available, structured stroke review records will be analysed quantitatively; semistructured interviews will be conducted with a purposive sample of study participants. Self-reports, observations and audio/video recordings will be coded and scored using specifically developed checklists. Semistructured interviews will be analysed thematically. Data will be analysed iteratively, independent of primary endpoint analysis. Favourable ethical opinion was gained from Yorkshire & The Humber-Bradford Leeds NHS Research Ethics Committee (19 December 2017, 17/YH/0441). Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. NCT03353519; Pre-results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32641334
pii: bmjopen-2020-036879
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036879
pmc: PMC7348649
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03353519']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e036879

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PTC-RP-PG-0213-20001
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e030285
pubmed: 31427339
Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1398-403
pubmed: 21441153
BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-6
pubmed: 16484270
Evid Based Med. 2016 Feb;21(1):1-3
pubmed: 26608477
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 15;6(9):e012027
pubmed: 27633636
Diabet Med. 2008 Sep;25(9):1117-20
pubmed: 19183318
Implement Sci. 2016 Dec 12;11(1):163
pubmed: 27955683
Circ Res. 2017 Feb 3;120(3):439-448
pubmed: 28154096
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(4):872-903
pubmed: 28762607
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Oct;73(5):852-60
pubmed: 16287385
BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6
pubmed: 10987780
J Clin Neurosci. 2006 Jan;13(1):84-90
pubmed: 16410202
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Feb;25(1):39-60
pubmed: 31693797
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Stroke. 2013 Sep;44(9):2532-5
pubmed: 23868278
Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):215-20
pubmed: 26505459
BMJ Open. 2011 Jan 1;1(2):e000269
pubmed: 22021893
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192533
pubmed: 29466383
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jan 4;20(1):2
pubmed: 30609920
Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):443-51
pubmed: 15367063

Auteurs

Maria Raisa Jessica Ryc Aquino (MRJR)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK ra532@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.

Ricky Mullis (R)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Elizabeth Kreit (E)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Vicki Johnson (V)

Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospital Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

Julie Grant (J)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Lisa Lim (L)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Stephen Sutton (S)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Jonathan Mant (J)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH