Prevalence and triggers of self-reported nasal hyperreactivity in adults with asthma.

AR, allergic rhinitis Asthma Atopy BHR, bronchial hyperreactivity Bronchial hyperreactivity FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second NHR, nasal hyperreactivity Nasal hyperreactivity Symptom severity VAS, visual analogue scale

Journal

The World Allergy Organization journal
ISSN: 1939-4551
Titre abrégé: World Allergy Organ J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101481283

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 08 11 2019
revised: 15 05 2020
accepted: 17 05 2020
entrez: 10 7 2020
pubmed: 10 7 2020
medline: 10 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Nasal hyperreactivity (NHR) is a common feature of various rhinitis subtypes and represents a novel phenotype of rhinitis. It is being reported in two-thirds of adult rhinitis patients irrespective of the atopic status. Data on the prevalence of NHR in patients with asthma are lacking, as well as the nature of evoking triggers. Postal questionnaires were distributed to an unselected group of asthmatic patients in Leuven (Belgium, n = 190) and completed by 114 patients. In Mexico City (Mexico) and Brasov (Romania), respectively, 97 out of 110 and 80 out of 100 asthmatic patients attending the outpatient clinic completed the questionnaire. Non-asthmatic volunteers were recruited amongst university and hospital co-workers in Leuven (n = 53). The presence of self-reported NHR, the type of triggers evoking nasal and bronchial symptoms, medication use, self-reported allergy, and environmental factors were evaluated. Overall, 69% of asthma patients reported NHR, with 32% having more than 4 triggers evoking NHR. These triggers included mainly exposure to temperature and humidity changes, cigarette smoke, and strong odours. A higher prevalence of NHR was detected in allergic compared to non-allergic asthma patients (73% vs. 53% p < 0.01). The prevalence of NHR correlated with asthma severity, ranging from 63% (VAS ≤3) to 81% (VAS ≥7). BHR was found more frequently in patients with NHR compared to without NHR (89% vs. 53%, p < 0.0001). NHR represents a clinical phenotype of upper airway disease affecting over two-thirds of asthma patients and correlates with asthma severity. Targeting NHR in patients with asthma is often overlooked and should be reinforced in the future to achieve better symptom control.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Nasal hyperreactivity (NHR) is a common feature of various rhinitis subtypes and represents a novel phenotype of rhinitis. It is being reported in two-thirds of adult rhinitis patients irrespective of the atopic status. Data on the prevalence of NHR in patients with asthma are lacking, as well as the nature of evoking triggers.
METHODS METHODS
Postal questionnaires were distributed to an unselected group of asthmatic patients in Leuven (Belgium, n = 190) and completed by 114 patients. In Mexico City (Mexico) and Brasov (Romania), respectively, 97 out of 110 and 80 out of 100 asthmatic patients attending the outpatient clinic completed the questionnaire. Non-asthmatic volunteers were recruited amongst university and hospital co-workers in Leuven (n = 53). The presence of self-reported NHR, the type of triggers evoking nasal and bronchial symptoms, medication use, self-reported allergy, and environmental factors were evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 69% of asthma patients reported NHR, with 32% having more than 4 triggers evoking NHR. These triggers included mainly exposure to temperature and humidity changes, cigarette smoke, and strong odours. A higher prevalence of NHR was detected in allergic compared to non-allergic asthma patients (73% vs. 53% p < 0.01). The prevalence of NHR correlated with asthma severity, ranging from 63% (VAS ≤3) to 81% (VAS ≥7). BHR was found more frequently in patients with NHR compared to without NHR (89% vs. 53%, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
NHR represents a clinical phenotype of upper airway disease affecting over two-thirds of asthma patients and correlates with asthma severity. Targeting NHR in patients with asthma is often overlooked and should be reinforced in the future to achieve better symptom control.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32642023
doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100132
pii: S1939-4551(20)30035-1
pii: 100132
pmc: PMC7334478
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100132

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

All authors state they have no conflict of interest in relation to this study and the results described in the manuscript.

Références

Allergy. 2018 Jan;73(1):248-250
pubmed: 28712109
Clin Exp Allergy. 2013 Aug;43(8):881-8
pubmed: 23889242
Rhinology. 2006 Sep;44(3):179-87
pubmed: 17020064
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr;137(4):1043-1053.e5
pubmed: 26846377
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1991 Apr;16(2):133-7
pubmed: 2070527
Allergy. 2015 Feb;70(2):187-94
pubmed: 25358760
Allergy. 2018 Sep;73(9):1784-1791
pubmed: 29624710
Rhinology. 2016 Jun;54(2):129-33
pubmed: 27017484
J Asthma. 2013 Jun;50(5):514-21
pubmed: 23506422
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jun;157(6 Pt 1):1748-55
pubmed: 9620901
Rhinology. 2012 Sep;50(3):227-35
pubmed: 22888478
Allergy. 2013 Nov;68(11):1427-34
pubmed: 24118053
Thorax. 2013 Oct;68(10):906-13
pubmed: 23821393
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Aug;140(2):437-446.e2
pubmed: 28389389
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Sep;118(3):551-9; quiz 560-1
pubmed: 16950269
Eur Respir J. 2017 May 1;49(5):
pubmed: 28461290
Respir Res. 2017 Feb 23;18(1):39
pubmed: 28231834
Allergy. 2018 May;73(5):1084-1093
pubmed: 29121401
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Oct;140(4):950-958
pubmed: 28602936
Allergy. 2018 Aug;73(8):1597-1608
pubmed: 29377177
Rhinology. 2007 Jun;45(2):144-7
pubmed: 17708462
Rhinology. 2017 Mar 1;55(1):34-38
pubmed: 28019644
Clin Exp Allergy. 1997 Jul;27(7):796-801
pubmed: 9249272
Allergy. 2018 Jan;73(1):8-16
pubmed: 28599081
Allergo J Int. 2017;26(1):16-24
pubmed: 28217433
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 May;133(5):1332-9, 1339.e1-3
pubmed: 24139494
Rhinology. 2018 Sep 1;56(3):279-287
pubmed: 29561921
Laryngoscope. 2012 Dec;122(12):2615-20
pubmed: 22865676

Auteurs

Jef Feijen (J)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.

Sven F Seys (SF)

KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Leuven, Belgium.

Brecht Steelant (B)

KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Leuven, Belgium.

Dominique M A Bullens (DMA)

KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Leuven, Belgium.
Clinical Division of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.

Lieven J Dupont (LJ)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.

Maria García-Cruz (M)

Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Mexico City, Mexico.

Alejandro Jimenez-Chobillón (A)

Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Mexico City, Mexico.

Désirée Larenas-Linnemann (D)

Investigational Unit, Hospital Médica Sur, Mexico-City, Mexico.

Laura Van Gerven (L)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.

Wytske J Fokkens (WJ)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Ioana Agache (I)

Department of Fundamental, Prophylactic and Clinical Disciplines, Transylvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Peter W Hellings (PW)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH