Management of Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fractures and a Review of External Fixation Techniques.
external fixation
facial plastic surgery
maxillofacial trauma
open reduction
otolaryngology
zygomatic arch fracture
Journal
Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction
ISSN: 1943-3875
Titre abrégé: Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101541666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez:
10
7
2020
pubmed:
10
7
2020
medline:
10
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fractures of the zygomatic bone can present with complicated aesthetic and neurological pathology. Specifically, management of isolated zygomatic fracture has been sparsely discussed in the literature, and most studies are based upon older techniques. Here, we compare the results of 2 critical operative techniques as well as review the available literature in the setting of isolated zygomatic fractures. A retrospective chart review was performed at our institution from 2010 to 2018 examining for patients who had sustained an isolated zygomatic fracture confirmed by computed tomography scan. Patients were excluded if they sustained additional maxillofacial fractures. Demographical information, symptoms on presentation, fracture management modality, and postoperative course were all collected and examined. A total of 218 patients were identified for inclusion. The average age of this cohort was 45.5 ± 18 years, with 77.5% being male. Assault (55%) was most the frequent cause of injury with accidents being the least common (17.9%). Most patients (78.8%) underwent nonoperative management. Patients who underwent operation more often presented with zygomatic deformity (97.7% vs 18.4%), paresthesia (29.5% vs 2.9%), and trismus (29.5% vs 6.9%) when compared to their nonoperatively managed counterparts. In all, 44 operatively managed patients underwent open reduction with or without eternal fixation (Gillies Approach vs Keen Approach). There were no significant differences in the presence of zygomatic deformity, paresthesia, and trismus between the 2 operative techniques. Isolated zygomatic arch fractures can present with discerning symptoms. Unfortunately, the literature on appropriate management is not well described. We find external fixation to provide reestablishment of both form and function with minimal required exposure, although the outcomes may be similar without the use of external fixation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32642030
doi: 10.1177/1943387520905164
pii: 10.1177_1943387520905164
pmc: PMC7311848
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
38-44Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 15;113(5):1517-8
pubmed: 15060380
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Apr;271(4):707-11
pubmed: 23793598
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Aug;24(4):269-71
pubmed: 2942180
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1162e-1171e
pubmed: 28445374
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Mar;23(2):537-8
pubmed: 22421848
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Mar;121(3):948-55
pubmed: 18317144
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Oct;30(7):2057-2060
pubmed: 31568157
Laryngoscope. 1986 Mar;96(3):325-6
pubmed: 3512942
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 May;23(3):859-62
pubmed: 22565912
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):891-7
pubmed: 21285793
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984 Sep;42(9):621-2
pubmed: 6590814
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012 Jun;11(2):171-6
pubmed: 23730064
Open Dent J. 2018 May 21;12:377-387
pubmed: 30202484
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980 May;65(5):673
pubmed: 7367510
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Aug;50(8):778-90
pubmed: 1634968
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Aug;16(4):445-7
pubmed: 3117917