T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign for noninvasive detection of IDH-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted gliomas: validity and pathophysiology.
biomarkers
glioma
isocitrate dehydrogenase
magnetic resonance imaging
Journal
Neuro-oncology advances
ISSN: 2632-2498
Titre abrégé: Neurooncol Adv
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101755003
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
10
7
2020
pubmed:
10
7
2020
medline:
10
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to assess the validity and pathophysiology of the T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign for noninvasive identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted glioma. Magnetic resonance imaging scans from 408 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed glioma (113 lower-grade gliomas and 295 glioblastomas) were evaluated for the presence of T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign by 2 independent reviewers. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the performance of the T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign for identifying IDH-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted tumors. An exploratory analysis of differences in contrast-enhancing tumor volumes, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) values in IDH-mutant gliomas with versus without the presence of a T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign (as well as analysis of spatial differences within tumors with the presence of a T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign) was performed. The T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign was present in 12 cases with lower-grade glioma (10.6%), all of them being IDH-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted tumors (sensitivity = 10.9%, specificity = 100%, PPV = 100%, NPV = 3.0%, accuracy = 13.3%). There was a substantial interrater agreement to identify the T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign (Cohen's kappa = 0.75 [95% CI, 0.57-0.93]). The T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign was not identified in any other molecular subgroup, including IDH-mutant glioblastoma cases ( This study confirms the high specificity of the T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign for noninvasive identification of IDH-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted gliomas; however, sensitivity is low and applicability is limited to lower-grade gliomas. Whether the higher ADC and lower rCBV values in IDH-mutant gliomas with a T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign (as compared to those without) translate into a measurable prognostic effect requires investigation in future studies. Moreover, spatial differences in ADC values between the core and rim of tumors with a T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign potentially reflect specific distinctions in tumor cellularity and microenvironment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to assess the validity and pathophysiology of the T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign for noninvasive identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted glioma.
METHODS
METHODS
Magnetic resonance imaging scans from 408 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed glioma (113 lower-grade gliomas and 295 glioblastomas) were evaluated for the presence of T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign by 2 independent reviewers. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the performance of the T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign for identifying IDH-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted tumors. An exploratory analysis of differences in contrast-enhancing tumor volumes, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) values in IDH-mutant gliomas with versus without the presence of a T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign (as well as analysis of spatial differences within tumors with the presence of a T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign) was performed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign was present in 12 cases with lower-grade glioma (10.6%), all of them being IDH-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted tumors (sensitivity = 10.9%, specificity = 100%, PPV = 100%, NPV = 3.0%, accuracy = 13.3%). There was a substantial interrater agreement to identify the T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign (Cohen's kappa = 0.75 [95% CI, 0.57-0.93]). The T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign was not identified in any other molecular subgroup, including IDH-mutant glioblastoma cases (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study confirms the high specificity of the T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign for noninvasive identification of IDH-mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted gliomas; however, sensitivity is low and applicability is limited to lower-grade gliomas. Whether the higher ADC and lower rCBV values in IDH-mutant gliomas with a T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign (as compared to those without) translate into a measurable prognostic effect requires investigation in future studies. Moreover, spatial differences in ADC values between the core and rim of tumors with a T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign potentially reflect specific distinctions in tumor cellularity and microenvironment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32642675
doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa004
pii: vdaa004
pmc: PMC7212872
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
vdaa004Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.
Références
Radiology. 2014 Sep;272(3):843-50
pubmed: 24814181
Radiology. 2017 Aug;284(2):316-331
pubmed: 28723281
J Neurooncol. 2019 Jan;141(2):327-335
pubmed: 30536195
Radiology. 2016 May;279(2):542-52
pubmed: 26579564
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Mar;55(3):524-31
pubmed: 16453314
Brain Pathol. 2013 May;23(3):311-8
pubmed: 23107103
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Sep 3;20(10):1393-1399
pubmed: 29590424
Neuroradiology. 2019 Feb;61(2):225-227
pubmed: 30565056
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2481-98
pubmed: 26061751
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):728-740
pubmed: 30952559
Neuroradiology. 2011 Jun;53(6):405-11
pubmed: 20644924
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Feb;37(2):485-494
pubmed: 26861817
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 15;23(20):6078-6085
pubmed: 28751449
Nat Med. 2009 May;15(5):572-6
pubmed: 19377487
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Oct 9;20(11):1517-1524
pubmed: 30107597
Semin Neurol. 2018 Feb;38(1):32-40
pubmed: 29548050
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):687-692
pubmed: 29519793
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):426-432
pubmed: 30705071
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 05;5:16238
pubmed: 26538165
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4429-4436
pubmed: 29789422
Neuro Oncol. 2018 May 18;20(6):848-857
pubmed: 29036412
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571