A snapshot of European neurosurgery December 2019 vs. March 2020: just before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Europe
Health Resources
/ supply & distribution
Health Services Needs and Demand
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Intensive Care Units
/ supply & distribution
Neurosurgical Procedures
/ statistics & numerical data
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ epidemiology
Surgery Department, Hospital
/ supply & distribution
Surveys and Questionnaires
Covid-19
Epidemic
Europe
Healthcare management
Neurosurgery
Pandemic
SARS-CoV-2
Journal
Acta neurochirurgica
ISSN: 0942-0940
Titre abrégé: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 0151000
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
08
06
2020
accepted:
30
06
2020
pubmed:
10
7
2020
medline:
29
8
2020
entrez:
10
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 or Covid-19), which began as an epidemic in China and spread globally as a pandemic, has necessitated resource management to meet emergency needs of Covid-19 patients and other emergent cases. We have conducted a survey to analyze caseload and measures to adapt indications for a perception of crisis. We constructed a questionnaire to survey a snapshot of neurosurgical activity, resources, and indications during 1 week with usual activity in December 2019 and 1 week during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in March 2020. The questionnaire was sent to 34 neurosurgical departments in Europe; 25 departments returned responses within 5 days. We found unexpectedly large differences in resources and indications already before the pandemic. Differences were also large in how much practice and resources changed during the pandemic. Neurosurgical beds and neuro-intensive care beds were significantly decreased from December 2019 to March 2020. The utilization of resources decreased via less demand for care of brain injuries and subarachnoid hemorrhage, postponing surgery and changed surgical indications as a method of rationing resources. Twenty departments (80%) reduced activity extensively, and the same proportion stated that they were no longer able to provide care according to legitimate medical needs. Neurosurgical centers responded swiftly and effectively to a sudden decrease of neurosurgical capacity due to relocation of resources to pandemic care. The pandemic led to rationing of neurosurgical care in 80% of responding centers. We saw a relation between resources before the pandemic and ability to uphold neurosurgical services. The observation of extensive differences of available beds provided an opportunity to show how resources that had been restricted already under normal conditions translated to rationing of care that may not be acceptable to the public of seemingly affluent European countries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 or Covid-19), which began as an epidemic in China and spread globally as a pandemic, has necessitated resource management to meet emergency needs of Covid-19 patients and other emergent cases. We have conducted a survey to analyze caseload and measures to adapt indications for a perception of crisis.
METHODS
We constructed a questionnaire to survey a snapshot of neurosurgical activity, resources, and indications during 1 week with usual activity in December 2019 and 1 week during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in March 2020. The questionnaire was sent to 34 neurosurgical departments in Europe; 25 departments returned responses within 5 days.
RESULTS
We found unexpectedly large differences in resources and indications already before the pandemic. Differences were also large in how much practice and resources changed during the pandemic. Neurosurgical beds and neuro-intensive care beds were significantly decreased from December 2019 to March 2020. The utilization of resources decreased via less demand for care of brain injuries and subarachnoid hemorrhage, postponing surgery and changed surgical indications as a method of rationing resources. Twenty departments (80%) reduced activity extensively, and the same proportion stated that they were no longer able to provide care according to legitimate medical needs.
CONCLUSION
Neurosurgical centers responded swiftly and effectively to a sudden decrease of neurosurgical capacity due to relocation of resources to pandemic care. The pandemic led to rationing of neurosurgical care in 80% of responding centers. We saw a relation between resources before the pandemic and ability to uphold neurosurgical services. The observation of extensive differences of available beds provided an opportunity to show how resources that had been restricted already under normal conditions translated to rationing of care that may not be acceptable to the public of seemingly affluent European countries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32642834
doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04482-8
pii: 10.1007/s00701-020-04482-8
pmc: PMC7343382
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2221-2233Références
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jul;162(7):1501
pubmed: 32377950
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jun;162(6):1223-1224
pubmed: 32303838
Lancet. 2005 Jan 29-Feb 4;365(9457):387-97
pubmed: 15680453
Crit Care. 2020 Feb 7;24(1):45
pubmed: 32033578
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jul;162(7):1503-1504
pubmed: 32385639
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Aug;162(8):1777-1782
pubmed: 32472377
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 25;17(1):642
pubmed: 28946870
Neuro Oncol. 2020 May 05;:
pubmed: 32369601
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jun;162(6):1227-1228
pubmed: 32291593
Neurosurgery. 2020 Aug 1;87(2):E186-E188
pubmed: 32310292
J Neurooncol. 2020 May;147(3):525-529
pubmed: 32274630
N Z Med J. 2020 Apr 24;133(1513):81-88
pubmed: 32325471
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jun;162(6):1225-1226
pubmed: 32318931
Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;27(4):233-234
pubmed: 32345850
World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137:465-468.e1
pubmed: 32247797
BMC Med. 2016 May 11;14:75
pubmed: 27170046
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jul;162(7):1485-1490
pubmed: 32405671
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jun;162(6):1229-1240
pubmed: 32314059
Nervenarzt. 2018 Jun;89(6):620-631
pubmed: 29663022
Neurol Clin. 1995 Nov;13(4):927-52
pubmed: 8584005
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jul;162(7):1491-1494
pubmed: 32367205
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):827-34
pubmed: 25798731
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):699-706
pubmed: 31975509
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jul;162(7):1507-1508
pubmed: 32383014
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jun;162(6):1221-1222
pubmed: 32222820
World Neurosurg X. 2019 Sep 09;6:100060
pubmed: 32309801
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Mar 07;11:369-375
pubmed: 29563817
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Aug;10(8):963-967
pubmed: 32348025
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jun;162(6):1217-1219
pubmed: 32221731