Tissue oxygenation indices of cerebrovascular autoregulation in healthy volunteers: a comparison of two NIRS devices.
Spectroscopy
arterial pressure/physiology
cerebrovascular circulation/physiology
healthy volunteers
homeostasis
near-infrared
Journal
Neurological research
ISSN: 1743-1328
Titre abrégé: Neurol Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7905298
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
10
7
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
entrez:
10
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Correlation coefficients between blood pressure and cerebral oxygen saturation measured using near-infrared spectrometry may be used to derive the tissue oximetry index of cerebral autoregulation. Cerebral oxygen saturations demonstrate poor agreement between near-infrared spectrometers however it is unclear if measurements of autoregulation are similarly specific to the equipment used. Cerebral oxygen saturation was monitored bilaterally in 74 healthy volunteers using both the FORE-SIGHT and EQUANOX monitors in random order. The tissue oximetry index was calculated during changes in blood pressure induced by isometric handgrip manoeuvres and the mean bias and limits of agreement were calculated. Tissue oximetry index measured by FORE-SIGHT was higher than EQUANOX (0.21 ± 0.16 versus 0.15 ± 0.17, P < 0.001) and limits of agreement were -0.24 to 0.36. Baseline cerebral oxygen saturation by FORE-SIGHT was lower than EQUANOX by 1.48% (CI95% 0.63-2.33) and limits of agreement ranged from -11.8% to 8.8%. The substantial bias and wide limits of agreement for the tissue oximetry index as a measure of cerebral autoregulation indicate that values must be treated as specific to models of near-infrared spectrometers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Correlation coefficients between blood pressure and cerebral oxygen saturation measured using near-infrared spectrometry may be used to derive the tissue oximetry index of cerebral autoregulation. Cerebral oxygen saturations demonstrate poor agreement between near-infrared spectrometers however it is unclear if measurements of autoregulation are similarly specific to the equipment used.
METHODS
METHODS
Cerebral oxygen saturation was monitored bilaterally in 74 healthy volunteers using both the FORE-SIGHT and EQUANOX monitors in random order. The tissue oximetry index was calculated during changes in blood pressure induced by isometric handgrip manoeuvres and the mean bias and limits of agreement were calculated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Tissue oximetry index measured by FORE-SIGHT was higher than EQUANOX (0.21 ± 0.16 versus 0.15 ± 0.17, P < 0.001) and limits of agreement were -0.24 to 0.36. Baseline cerebral oxygen saturation by FORE-SIGHT was lower than EQUANOX by 1.48% (CI95% 0.63-2.33) and limits of agreement ranged from -11.8% to 8.8%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The substantial bias and wide limits of agreement for the tissue oximetry index as a measure of cerebral autoregulation indicate that values must be treated as specific to models of near-infrared spectrometers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32643591
doi: 10.1080/01616412.2020.1790869
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM