Analytical formulae for trajectory displacement in electron beam and generalized slice method.
Coulomb interaction
Electron optics
Holtzmark regime
Pencil-beam regime
Slice method
Trajectory displacement
Journal
Ultramicroscopy
ISSN: 1879-2723
Titre abrégé: Ultramicroscopy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7513702
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
08
08
2019
revised:
10
06
2020
accepted:
15
06
2020
pubmed:
10
7
2020
medline:
10
7
2020
entrez:
10
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Trajectory displacement due to statistical Coulomb interactions can play a major role in determining the performance of a charged particle beam system. Accurate estimation of the trajectory displacement is thus an important part of the design procedure of such an optical system. Traditionally, there are three approaches to determine the trajectory displacement: Monte Carlo simulation, the slice method, where trajectory displacement is integrated along the beam length and finally a full analytical formula describing transparently the dependence of the trajectory displacement on the parameters of the system. The latter two were developed thoroughly by Jansen and Jiang. We revise Jansen's slice method and the derivation of the integral formulae in Holtzmark and pencil-beam regimes. We show the integral formula fails to give accurate results in case a transition between the regimes occurs and we derive a new analytical expression unifying the Holtzmark and pencil-beam regime into a single formula. Furthermore, we generalize the slice method for arbitrary beam trajectory, hugely increasing its accuracy for non-ideal systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32645563
pii: S0304-3991(20)30201-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113050
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113050Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.