Resistance to Fracture of Zirconia Abutments with Different Angulations: Impact of Implant Platform Diameter.


Journal

European journal of dentistry
ISSN: 1305-7456
Titre abrégé: Eur J Dent
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101303672

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 10 7 2020
medline: 10 7 2020
entrez: 10 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

 The aim of this study was to assess the impact of implant platform diameters on ultimate force to failure of zirconia abutments with different angulation.  Forty-two zirconia abutments with either 0 degree (ST) or 15-degree (AN) angulation were assembled on tapered internal connection titanium implants (Direct's Legacy; 13 mm Implant Direct, LLC, Las Vegas, United States) with a platform diameter of Ø3.0, Ø3.5, and Ø4.5 mm (14 per group). Zirconia crowns (Ceramill Zolid; Amann Girrbach GmbH) were fabricated and cemented using self-adhesive resin cement (MaxCem Elite, Kerr). The specimens were thermomechanically loaded (TCML= 6,000 cycles of 5 to 50°C for 2 minutes/cycle followed by cyclic loading 600,000 cycles) followed by static loading until fracture. The data of load (N) at which fracture occurred were statistically analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U tests at 5% significance level.  Higher load to fracture was reported for zirconia crowns in straight abutments groups and a platform of 4.5, 3.5, and 3 mm diameter was 438.2± 85.4, 345.5± 71.3, and 331.1± 59.1 N, respectively. However, the groups restored with zirconia crowns in angulated abutments groups and a platform of 4.5, 3.5, or 3 mm diameter showed a fracture load of 411.4 ± 49.8, 354.2 ± 52.5, and 302.8 ± 52.5 N, respectively.  Straight and angulated zirconia abutments presented similar load to fracture on 3 and 3.5 mm platform diameters yet being significantly less for 4.5 mm diameter.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32645732
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709947
pmc: PMC7535972
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

517-524

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared.

Références

J Esthet Dent. 1993 Mar-Apr;5(2):63-8
pubmed: 8240848
Acta Odontol Scand. 1993 Oct;51(5):323-31
pubmed: 8279273
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug;19(4):717-724
pubmed: 28544215
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Nov/Dec;31(6):1240-1246
pubmed: 27861648
Dent Clin North Am. 2011 Apr;55(2):333-52, ix
pubmed: 21473997
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Apr;87(4):438-45
pubmed: 12011861
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):850-8
pubmed: 19865625
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Apr;109(4):255-63
pubmed: 23566607
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):45-55
pubmed: 21365037
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Nov 01;9(7):41-8
pubmed: 18997915
J Oral Implantol. 2017 Oct;43(5):337-344
pubmed: 28708461
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Nov-Dec;15(6):801-10
pubmed: 11151578
Eur J Dent. 2010 Apr;4(2):223-32
pubmed: 20396457
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Aug;116(2):277-85
pubmed: 26996934
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jan;56(1):43-47
pubmed: 29179980
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):636-46
pubmed: 19885403
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Oct;82(4):436-40
pubmed: 10512962
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1272-9
pubmed: 26574852
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Aug;68(2):322-6
pubmed: 1501183
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Sep-Oct;14(5):432-8
pubmed: 12066638
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jun;17(3):554-61
pubmed: 24118925
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008 May;29(4):238-40, 242
pubmed: 18524208
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Aug 01;16(8):613-8
pubmed: 26423495
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):488-93
pubmed: 23527351
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):10-17
pubmed: 28385430
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):157-63
pubmed: 20084415
J Prosthodont. 2015 Feb;24(2):127-35
pubmed: 24975560
Quintessence Int. 2006 Jan;37(1):19-26
pubmed: 16429699
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jun;25(6):675-82
pubmed: 23106096
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jan;29(1):91-99
pubmed: 28940708
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Sep-Oct;25(5):991-8
pubmed: 20862414
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Oct;90(4):325-31
pubmed: 14564286
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Jan;31(1):18-22
pubmed: 15125591
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jan;29(1):20-27
pubmed: 28664585
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:4-31
pubmed: 19663946
J Prosthodont. 2017 Apr;26(3):252-260
pubmed: 27379723
Aust Dent J. 2011 Jun;56(2):132-40
pubmed: 21623803
J Esthet Dent. 1993 Jan-Feb;5(1):29-36
pubmed: 8507510
Implant Dent. 2002;11(1):41-51
pubmed: 11915544
Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Sep-Oct;15(5):488-93
pubmed: 12375466
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Feb;66:224-232
pubmed: 27915156
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):1029-36
pubmed: 19216271
Biomaterials. 1999 Jan;20(1):1-25
pubmed: 9916767
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Oct;47(5):312-327
pubmed: 29093988
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Oct;11(5):465-75
pubmed: 11168239
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May;14 Suppl 1:e196-203
pubmed: 22222141
J Oral Rehabil. 2001 May;28(5):485-91
pubmed: 11380790
Int J Prosthodont. 2004 May-Jun;17(3):285-90
pubmed: 15237873
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 Fall;7(3):353-9
pubmed: 1289261

Auteurs

Samah Saker (S)

Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Walid Al-Zordk (W)

Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Mutlu Özcan (M)

University of Zurich, Center of Dental Medicine, Division of Dental Biomaterials, Clinic for Reconstructive Dentistry, Zurich, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH