Competition in Public Procurement in the Czech and Slovak Public Health Care Sectors.
Czech Republic
Slovakia
competitiveness
efficiency
health care
public procurement
Journal
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jul 2020
07 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
11
06
2020
revised:
03
07
2020
accepted:
03
07
2020
entrez:
11
7
2020
pubmed:
11
7
2020
medline:
11
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sustainability of health financing is a critical issue for all countries, especially now in the COVID-19 period. The final level of achievements of critical public health goals is connected not only with the efforts of the people involved, but also with the availability of funding to cover the costs of the actions needed. One of the "internal sources" providing more resources to cover public health care costs is effective public procurement in the health care sector. According to existing scientific literature, a low rate of competition represents one important factor that has a direct negative impact on the efficiency of public procurement. The aim of our article is to examine the degree of competitiveness of public procurement in the Czech and Slovak health care systems and its impact on the final price of a contract. The research fully attested the findings of those studies carried out so far - the higher the number of tenderers, the lower the final price, even in the Czech and Slovak health sectors. However, the average number of tenderers is only around two and in the Czech Republic for more than half of the tenders only one bid was submitted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32646044
pii: healthcare8030201
doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030201
pmc: PMC7551073
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
ID : APVV-17-0360
Références
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jan;32(1):146-54
pubmed: 23297282
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jul;113:110-9
pubmed: 24861412
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Jul;11(3):253-73
pubmed: 26670267