Flexible use of allocentric and egocentric spatial memories activates differential neural networks in mice.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 07 2020
Historique:
received: 17 12 2019
accepted: 08 06 2020
entrez: 11 7 2020
pubmed: 11 7 2020
medline: 1 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Goal-directed navigation can be based on world-centered (allocentric) or body-centered (egocentric) representations of the environment, mediated by a wide network of interconnected brain regions, including hippocampus, striatum and prefrontal cortex. The relative contribution of these regions to navigation from novel or familiar routes, that demand a different degree of flexibility in the use of the stored spatial representations, has not been completely explored. To address this issue, we trained mice to find a reward relying on allocentric or egocentric information, in a modified version of the cross-maze task. Then we used Zif268 expression to map brain activation when well-trained mice were required to find the goal from a novel or familiar location. Successful navigation was correlated with the activation of CA1, posterior-dorsomedial striatum, nucleus accumbens core and infralimbic cortex when allocentric-trained mice needed to use a novel route. Allocentric navigation from a familiar route activated dorsomedial striatum, nucleus accumbens, prelimbic and infralimbic cortex. None of the structures analyzed was significantly activated in egocentric-trained mice, irrespective of the starting position. These data suggest that a flexible use of stored allocentric information, that allows goal finding even from a location never explored during training, induces a shift from fronto-striatal to hippocampal circuits.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32647258
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68025-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-68025-y
pmc: PMC7347635
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

11338

Références

O’Keefe, J. & Nadel, L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1978).
White, N. M. & McDonald, R. J. Multiple parallel memory systems in the brain of the rat. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 77, 125–184 (2002).
pubmed: 11848717 doi: 10.1006/nlme.2001.4008
Potegal, M. The caudate nucleus egocentric localization system. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars) 32, 479–494 (1972).
Tolman, E. C. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev. 55, 189–208 (1948).
pubmed: 18870876 doi: 10.1037/h0061626
Packard, M. G. & McGaugh, J. L. Double dissociation of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on acquisition of two water maze tasks: further evidence for multiple memory systems. Behav. Neurosci. 106, 439–446 (1992).
pubmed: 1616610 doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.106.3.439
Packard, M. G. & McGaugh, J. L. Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 65, 65–72 (1996).
pubmed: 8673408 doi: 10.1006/nlme.1996.0007
McDonald, R. J. & White, N. M. Parallel information processing in the water maze: evidence for independent memory systems involving dorsal striatum and hippocampus. Behav. Neural Biol. 61, 260–270 (1994).
pubmed: 8067981 doi: 10.1016/S0163-1047(05)80009-3
Cook, D. & Kesner, R. P. Caudate nucleus and memory for egocentric localization. Behav. Neural Biol. 49, 332–343 (1988).
pubmed: 3408445 doi: 10.1016/S0163-1047(88)90338-X
Morris, R. G., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. & O’Keefe, J. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297, 681–683 (1982).
pubmed: 7088155 doi: 10.1038/297681a0
Yin, H. H. & Knowlton, B. J. The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 464–476 (2006).
pubmed: 16715055 doi: 10.1038/nrn1919
Mizumori, S. J. Y., Yeshenko, O., Gill, K. M. & Davis, D. M. Parallel processing across neural systems: implications for a multiple memory system hypothesis. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 82, 278–298 (2004).
pubmed: 15464410 doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2004.07.007
Yeshenko, O., Guazzelli, A. & Mizumori, S. J. Y. Context-dependent reorganization of spatial and movement representations by simultaneously recorded hippocampal and striatal neurons during performance of allocentric and egocentric tasks. Behav. Neurosci. 118, 751–769 (2004).
pubmed: 15301602 doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.751
Wiener, S. I. Spatial and behavioral correlates of striatal neurons in rats performing a self-initiated navigation task. J. Neurosci. 13, 3802–3817 (1993).
pubmed: 8366346 pmcid: 6576451 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-09-03802.1993
Whishaw, I. Q., Mittleman, G., Bunch, S. T. & Dunnett, S. B. Impairments in the acquisition, retention and selection of spatial navigation strategies after medial caudate-putamen lesions in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 24, 125–138 (1987).
pubmed: 3593524 doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(87)90250-6
Devan, B. D., McDonald, R. J. & White, N. M. Effects of medial and lateral caudate-putamen lesions on place- and cue-guided behaviors in the water maze: relation to thigmotaxis. Behav. Brain Res. 100, 5–14 (1999).
pubmed: 10212049 doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(98)00107-7
Devan, B. D. & White, N. M. Parallel information processing in the dorsal striatum: relation to hippocampal function. J. Neurosci. 19, 2789–2798 (1999).
pubmed: 10087090 pmcid: 6786063 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02789.1999
Yin, H. H. & Knowlton, B. J. Contributions of striatal subregions to place and response learning. Learn. Mem. 11, 459–463 (2004).
pubmed: 15286184 pmcid: 498333 doi: 10.1101/lm.81004
Moser, E. I., Kropff, E. & Moser, M.-B. Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 69–89 (2008).
pubmed: 18284371 doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.061307.090723
Chersi, F. & Burgess, N. The Cognitive Architecture of Spatial Navigation: Hippocampal and Striatal Contributions. Neuron 88, 64–77 (2015).
pubmed: 26447573 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.021
Ekstrom, A. D., Huffman, D. J. & Starrett, M. Interacting networks of brain regions underlie human spatial navigation: a review and novel synthesis of the literature. J. Neurophysiol. 118, 3328–3344 (2017).
pubmed: 28931613 pmcid: 5814720 doi: 10.1152/jn.00531.2017
Frankland, P. W. & Bontempi, B. The organization of recent and remote memories. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 119–130 (2005).
pubmed: 15685217 doi: 10.1038/nrn1607
Dudchenko, P. A., Wood, E. R. & Eichenbaum, H. Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions have no effect on odor span and little effect on odor recognition memory but produce significant impairments on spatial span, recognition, and alternation. J. Neurosci. 20, 2964–2977 (2000).
pubmed: 10751449 pmcid: 6772220 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-08-02964.2000
Winocur, G., Moscovitch, M., Fogel, S., Rosenbaum, R. S. & Sekeres, M. Preserved spatial memory after hippocampal lesions: effects of extensive experience in a complex environment. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 273–275 (2005).
pubmed: 15723062 doi: 10.1038/nn1401
Hartley, T., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J. & Burgess, N. The well-worn route and the path less traveled: distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans. Neuron 37, 877–888 (2003).
pubmed: 12628177 doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00095-3
Juan, M. J. R. Preserved learning about allocentric cues but impaired flexible memory expression in rats with hippocampal lesions. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 93, 506–514 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.01.008
Eichenbaum, H. & Cohen, N. J. Can we reconcile the declarative memory and spatial navigation views on hippocampal function?. Neuron 83, 764–770 (2014).
pubmed: 25144874 pmcid: 4148642 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.032
Eichenbaum, H. The role of the hippocampus in navigation is memory. J. Neurophysiol. 117, 1785–1796 (2017).
pubmed: 28148640 pmcid: 5384971 doi: 10.1152/jn.00005.2017
Brown, T. I., Ross, R. S., Tobyne, S. M. & Stern, C. E. Cooperative interactions between hippocampal and striatal systems support flexible navigation. NeuroImage 60, 1316–1330 (2012).
pubmed: 22266411 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.046
Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F. & Kalish, D. Studies in spatial learning; place learning versus response learning. J. Exp. Psychol. 36, 221–229 (1946).
pubmed: 20985357 doi: 10.1037/h0060262
De Leonibus, E. et al. Cognitive and neural determinants of response strategy in the dual-solution plus-maze task. Learn. Mem. 18, 241–244 (2011).
pubmed: 21436396 doi: 10.1101/lm.2074311
Skinner, D. M. et al. An analysis of response, direction, and place learning in an open field and T maze. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 29, 3–13 (2003).
pubmed: 12561129 doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.1.3
Hall, J., Thomas, K. L. & Everitt, B. J. Cellular imaging of zif268 expression in the hippocampus and amygdala during contextual and cued fear memory retrieval: selective activation of hippocampal CA1 neurons during the recall of contextual memories. J. Neurosci. 21, 2186–2193 (2001).
pubmed: 11245703 pmcid: 6762622 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-06-02186.2001
Thomas, K. L., Hall, J. & Everitt, B. J. Cellular imaging with zif268 expression in the rat nucleus accumbens and frontal cortex further dissociates the neural pathways activated following the retrieval of contextual and cued fear memory. Eur. J. Neurosci. 16, 1789–1796 (2002).
pubmed: 12431232 doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02247.x
Laroche, S., Davis, S. & Bozon, B. A requirement for the immediate early gene zif268 in reconsolidation of recognition memory after retrieval. Neuron 40, 695–701 (2003).
pubmed: 14622575 doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00674-3
Tanimizu, T. et al. Functional connectivity of multiple brain regions required for the consolidation of social recognition memory. J. Neurosci. 37, 4103–4116 (2017).
pubmed: 28292834 pmcid: 6596582 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3451-16.2017
Silva, B. A., Burns, A. M. & Gräff, J. A cFos activation map of remote fear memory attenuation. Psychopharmacology 236, 369–381 (2019).
pubmed: 30116860 doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5000-y
Wheeler, A. L. et al. Identification of a functional connectome for long-term fear memory in mice. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002853–e1002918 (2013).
pubmed: 23300432 pmcid: 3536620 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002853
Daumas, S., Halley, H., Francés, B. & Lassalle, J. M. Encoding, consolidation, and retrieval of contextual memory: differential involvement of dorsal CA3 and CA1 hippocampal subregions. Learn. Mem. 12, 375–382 (2005).
pubmed: 16027176 pmcid: 1183255 doi: 10.1101/lm.81905
Ocampo, A. C., Squire, L. R. & Clark, R. E. Hippocampal area CA1 and remote memory in rats. Learn. Mem. 24, 563–568 (2017).
pubmed: 29038217 pmcid: 5647930 doi: 10.1101/lm.045781.117
Hunsaker, M. R. & Kesner, R. P. Unfolding the cognitive map_ The role of hippocampal and extra-hippocampal substrates based on a systems analysis of spatial processing. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 147, 90–119 (2018).
pubmed: 29222057 doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.11.012
Riedel, G. et al. Reversible neural inactivation reveals hippocampal participation in several memory processes. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 898–905 (1999).
pubmed: 10491611 doi: 10.1038/13202
Teixeira, C. M., Pomedli, S. R., Maei, H. R., Kee, N. & Frankland, P. W. Involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in the expression of remote spatial memory. J. Neurosci. 26, 7555–7564 (2006).
pubmed: 16855083 pmcid: 6674278 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1068-06.2006
Rinaldi, A., Oliverio, A., Romeo, S., Agustín-Pavón, C. & Mele, A. Distinct patterns of Fos immunoreactivity in striatum and hippocampus induced by different kinds of novelty in mice. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 94, 373–381 (2010).
pubmed: 20736076 doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.08.004
Lisman, J. E. & Grace, A. A. The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Neuron 46, 703–713 (2005).
pubmed: 15924857 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.002
Vinogradova, O. S. Hippocampus as comparator: role of the two input and two output systems of the hippocampus in selection and registration of information. Hippocampus 11, 578–598 (2001).
pubmed: 11732710 doi: 10.1002/hipo.1073
Jenkins, T. A., Amin, E., Pearce, J. M., Brown, M. W. & Aggleton, J. P. Novel spatial arrangements of familiar visual stimuli promote activity in the rat hippocampal formation but not the parahippocampal cortices: a c-fos expression study. Neuroscience 124, 43–52 (2004).
pubmed: 14960338 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.11.024
Lee, J. L. C. Memory reconsolidation mediates the updating of hippocampal memory content. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 168 (2010).
pubmed: 21120142 pmcid: 2991235 doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00168
Jung, M. W., Lee, H., Jeong, Y., Lee, J. W. & Lee, I. Remembering rewarding futures: a simulation-selection model of the hippocampus. Hippocampus 28, 913–930 (2018).
pubmed: 30155938 pmcid: 6587829 doi: 10.1002/hipo.23023
Torromino, G. et al. Offline ventral subiculum-ventral striatum serial communication is required for spatial memory consolidation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5721 (2019).
pubmed: 31844154 pmcid: 6915753 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13703-3
McGeorge, A. J. & Faull, R. L. The organization of the projection from the cerebral cortex to the striatum in the rat. Neuroscience 29, 503–537 (1989).
pubmed: 2472578 doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90128-0
Berendse, H. W., Groenewegen, H. J. & Lohman, A. H. Compartmental distribution of ventral striatal neurons projecting to the mesencephalon in the rat. J. Neurosci. 12, 2079–2103 (1992).
pubmed: 1607929 pmcid: 6575937 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-06-02079.1992
Brog, J. S., Salyapongse, A., Deutch, A. Y. & Zahm, D. S. The patterns of afferent innervation of the core and shell in the ‘accumbens’ part of the rat ventral striatum: immunohistochemical detection of retrogradely transported fluoro-gold. J. Comp. Neurol. 338, 255–278 (1993).
pubmed: 8308171 doi: 10.1002/cne.903380209
Groenewegen, H. J., Wright, C. I. & Uylings, H. B. The anatomical relationships of the prefrontal cortex with limbic structures and the basal ganglia. J. Psychopharmacol. (Oxford) 11, 99–106 (1997).
doi: 10.1177/026988119701100202
Vertes, R. P. Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat. Synapse 51, 32–58 (2004).
pubmed: 14579424 doi: 10.1002/syn.10279
Yin, H. H., Knowlton, B. J. & Balleine, B. W. Blockade of NMDA receptors in the dorsomedial striatum prevents action-outcome learning in instrumental conditioning. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22, 505–512 (2005).
pubmed: 16045503 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04219.x
Woolley, D. G. et al. Homologous involvement of striatum and prefrontal cortex in rodent and human water maze learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3131–3136 (2013).
pubmed: 23382228 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217832110 pmcid: 3581978
Atallah, H. E., Lopez-Paniagua, D., Rudy, J. W. & O’Reilly, R. C. Separate neural substrates for skill learning and performance in the ventral and dorsal striatum. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 126–131 (2007).
pubmed: 17187065 doi: 10.1038/nn1817
Lavoie, A. M. & Mizumori, S. J. Spatial, movement- and reward-sensitive discharge by medial ventral striatum neurons of rats. Brain Res. 638, 157–168 (1994).
pubmed: 8199856 doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90645-9
Usiello, A. et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the nucleus accumbens are involved in detection of spatial novelty in mice. Psychopharmacology 123, 52–59 (1998).
Shibata, R., Mulder, A. B., Trullier, O. & Wiener, S. I. Position sensitivity in phasically discharging nucleus accumbens neurons of rats alternating between tasks requiring complementary types of spatial cues. Neuroscience 108, 391–411 (2001).
pubmed: 11738254 doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00400-6
Ferretti, V. et al. Ventral striatal plasticity and spatial memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7945–7950 (2010).
pubmed: 20351272 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911757107 pmcid: 2867912
Rinaldi, A., Oliverio, A. & Mele, A. Spatial memory, plasticity and nucleus accumbens. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 527–541 (2012).
pubmed: 23104853 doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2012-0070
Bontempi, B., Laurent-Demir, C., Destrade, C. & Jaffard, R. Time-dependent reorganization of brain circuitry underlying long-term memory storage. Nature 400, 671–675 (1999).
pubmed: 10458162 doi: 10.1038/23270
Euston, D. R., Gruber, A. J. & McNaughton, B. L. The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making. Neuron 76, 1057–1070 (2012).
pubmed: 23259943 pmcid: 3562704 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.002
Hyman, J. M., Hasselmo, M. E. & Seamans, J. K. What is the functional relevance of prefrontal cortex entrainment to hippocampal theta rhythms?. Front. Neurosci. 5, 24 (2011).
pubmed: 21427795 pmcid: 3052540 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00024
Kolb, B., Pittman, K., Sutherland, R. J. & Whishaw, I. Q. Dissociation of the contributions of the prefrontal cortex and dorsomedial thalamic nucleus to spatially guided behavior in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 6, 365–378 (1982).
pubmed: 7171389 doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(82)90018-3
Seamans, J. K., Floresco, S. B. & Phillips, A. G. Functional differences between the prelimbic and anterior cingulate regions of the rat prefrontal cortex. Behav. Neurosci. 109, 1063–1073 (1995).
pubmed: 8748957 doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.109.6.1063
Floresco, S. B., Seamans, J. K. & Phillips, A. G. Selective roles for hippocampal, prefrontal cortical, and ventral striatal circuits in radial-arm maze tasks with or without a delay. J. Neurosci. 17, 1880–1890 (1997).
pubmed: 9030646 pmcid: 6573377 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-05-01880.1997
Rinaldi, A., Mandillo, S., Oliverio, A. & Mele, A. D1 and D2 receptor antagonist injections in the prefrontal cortex selectively impair spatial learning in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 32, 309–319 (2007).
pubmed: 16900106 doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301176
Poucet, B. Object exploration, habituation, and response to a spatial change in rats following septal or medial frontal cortical damage. Behav. Neurosci. 103, 1009–1016 (1989).
pubmed: 2803548 doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.103.5.1009
Delatour, B. & Gisquet-Verrier, P. Prelimbic cortex specific lesions disrupt delayed-variable response tasks in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 110, 1282–1298 (1996).
pubmed: 8986332 doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.110.6.1282
Granon, S., Save, E., Buhot, M.-C. & Poucet, B. Effortful information processing in a spontaneous spatial situation by rats with medial prefrontal lesions. Behav. Brain Res. 78, 147–154 (1996).
pubmed: 8864046 doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00242-1
de Bruin, J. P., Moita, M. P., de Brabander, H. M. & Joosten, R. N. Place and response learning of rats in a Morris water maze: differential effects of fimbria fornix and medial prefrontal cortex lesions. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 75, 164–178 (2001).
pubmed: 11222058 doi: 10.1006/nlme.2000.3962
Lacroix, L., White, I. & Feldon, J. Effect of excitotoxic lesions of rat medial prefrontal cortex on spatial memory. Behav. Brain Res. 133, 69–81 (2002).
pubmed: 12048175 doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00442-9
Kesner, R. P., Farnsworth, G. & DiMattia, B. V. Double dissociation of egocentric and allocentric space following medial prefrontal and parietal cortex lesions in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 103, 956–961 (1989).
pubmed: 2803562 doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.103.5.956
Hok, V., Save, E., Lenck-Santini, P. P. & Poucet, B. Coding for spatial goals in the prelimbic/infralimbic area of the rat frontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4602–4607 (2005).
pubmed: 15761059 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407332102 pmcid: 555486
Ragozzino, M. E., Detrick, S. & Kesner, R. P. Involvement of the prelimbic-infralimbic areas of the rodent prefrontal cortex in behavioral flexibility for place and response learning. J. Neurosci. 19, 4585–4594 (1999).
pubmed: 10341256 pmcid: 6782617 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04585.1999
Vidal-Gonzalez, I., Vidal-Gonzalez, B., Rauch, S. L. & Quirk, G. J. Microstimulation reveals opposing influences of prelimbic and infralimbic cortex on the expression of conditioned fear. Learn. Mem. 13, 728–733 (2006).
pubmed: 17142302 pmcid: 1783626 doi: 10.1101/lm.306106
Sierra-Mercado, D., Padilla-Coreano, N. & Quirk, G. J. Dissociable roles of prelimbic and infralimbic cortices, ventral hippocampus, and basolateral amygdala in the expression and extinction of conditioned fear. Neuropsychopharmacology 36, 529–538 (2010).
pubmed: 20962768 pmcid: 3005957 doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.184
Mukherjee, A. & Caroni, P. Infralimbic cortex is required for learning alternatives to prelimbic promoted associations through reciprocal connectivity. Nat. Commun. 9, 2727 (2018).
pubmed: 30006525 pmcid: 6045592 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05318-x
Hintiryan, H. et al. The mouse cortico-striatal projectome. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1100–1114 (2016).
pubmed: 27322419 pmcid: 5564682 doi: 10.1038/nn.4332
Colombo, P. J., Brightwell, J. J. & Countryman, R. A. Cognitive strategy-specific increases in phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein and c-Fos in the hippocampus and dorsal striatum. J. Neurosci 23, 3547–3554 (2003).
pubmed: 12716964 pmcid: 6742292 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-08-03547.2003
De Leonibus, E., Oliverio, A. & Mele, A. A study on the role of the dorsal striatum and the nucleus accumbens in allocentric and egocentric spatial memory consolidation. Learn. Mem. 12, 491–503 (2005).
pubmed: 16166396 pmcid: 1240061 doi: 10.1101/lm.94805
Miniaci, M. C. & De Leonibus, E. Missing the egocentric spatial reference: a blank on the map. F100Res 7, 168 (2018).
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13675.1
Ekstrom, A. D. A critical review of the allocentric spatial representation and its neural underpinnings: toward a network-based perspective. Front Hum Neurosci 8, 803 (2014).
pubmed: 25346679 pmcid: 4193251 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00803
Goodroe, S. C., Starnes, J. & Brown, T. I. The complex nature of hippocampal-striatal interactions in spatial navigation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12, 250 (2018).
pubmed: 29977198 pmcid: 6021746 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00250
Fouquet, C. et al. Complementary roles of the hippocampus and the dorsomedial striatum during spatial and sequence-based navigation behavior. PLoS ONE 8, e67232–e67311 (2013).
pubmed: 23826243 pmcid: 3695082 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067232
Franklin, K. B. J. & Paxinos, G. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 2nd edn. (Academic Press, Cambridge, 1997).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
pubmed: 14597658 pmcid: 403769 doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303

Auteurs

Arianna Rinaldi (A)

Department of Biology and Biotechnology C. Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. arianna.rinaldi@uniroma1.it.
Centre for Research in Neurobiology D. Bovet, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. arianna.rinaldi@uniroma1.it.

Elvira De Leonibus (E)

Institute of Cellular Biology and Biochemistry, IBBC-CNR, Naples, Italy.

Alessandra Cifra (A)

Department of Biology and Biotechnology C. Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Giulia Torromino (G)

Department of Biology and Biotechnology C. Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Elisa Minicocci (E)

Department of Biology and Biotechnology C. Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Elisa De Sanctis (E)

Department of Biology and Biotechnology C. Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Rosa María López-Pedrajas (RM)

Department of Biology and Biotechnology C. Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.

Alberto Oliverio (A)

Department of Biology and Biotechnology C. Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Centre for Research in Neurobiology D. Bovet, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Andrea Mele (A)

Department of Biology and Biotechnology C. Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Centre for Research in Neurobiology D. Bovet, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH