Flexible use of allocentric and egocentric spatial memories activates differential neural networks in mice.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 07 2020
09 07 2020
Historique:
received:
17
12
2019
accepted:
08
06
2020
entrez:
11
7
2020
pubmed:
11
7
2020
medline:
1
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Goal-directed navigation can be based on world-centered (allocentric) or body-centered (egocentric) representations of the environment, mediated by a wide network of interconnected brain regions, including hippocampus, striatum and prefrontal cortex. The relative contribution of these regions to navigation from novel or familiar routes, that demand a different degree of flexibility in the use of the stored spatial representations, has not been completely explored. To address this issue, we trained mice to find a reward relying on allocentric or egocentric information, in a modified version of the cross-maze task. Then we used Zif268 expression to map brain activation when well-trained mice were required to find the goal from a novel or familiar location. Successful navigation was correlated with the activation of CA1, posterior-dorsomedial striatum, nucleus accumbens core and infralimbic cortex when allocentric-trained mice needed to use a novel route. Allocentric navigation from a familiar route activated dorsomedial striatum, nucleus accumbens, prelimbic and infralimbic cortex. None of the structures analyzed was significantly activated in egocentric-trained mice, irrespective of the starting position. These data suggest that a flexible use of stored allocentric information, that allows goal finding even from a location never explored during training, induces a shift from fronto-striatal to hippocampal circuits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32647258
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68025-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-68025-y
pmc: PMC7347635
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11338Références
O’Keefe, J. & Nadel, L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1978).
White, N. M. & McDonald, R. J. Multiple parallel memory systems in the brain of the rat. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 77, 125–184 (2002).
pubmed: 11848717
doi: 10.1006/nlme.2001.4008
Potegal, M. The caudate nucleus egocentric localization system. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars) 32, 479–494 (1972).
Tolman, E. C. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev. 55, 189–208 (1948).
pubmed: 18870876
doi: 10.1037/h0061626
Packard, M. G. & McGaugh, J. L. Double dissociation of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on acquisition of two water maze tasks: further evidence for multiple memory systems. Behav. Neurosci. 106, 439–446 (1992).
pubmed: 1616610
doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.106.3.439
Packard, M. G. & McGaugh, J. L. Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 65, 65–72 (1996).
pubmed: 8673408
doi: 10.1006/nlme.1996.0007
McDonald, R. J. & White, N. M. Parallel information processing in the water maze: evidence for independent memory systems involving dorsal striatum and hippocampus. Behav. Neural Biol. 61, 260–270 (1994).
pubmed: 8067981
doi: 10.1016/S0163-1047(05)80009-3
Cook, D. & Kesner, R. P. Caudate nucleus and memory for egocentric localization. Behav. Neural Biol. 49, 332–343 (1988).
pubmed: 3408445
doi: 10.1016/S0163-1047(88)90338-X
Morris, R. G., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. & O’Keefe, J. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297, 681–683 (1982).
pubmed: 7088155
doi: 10.1038/297681a0
Yin, H. H. & Knowlton, B. J. The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 464–476 (2006).
pubmed: 16715055
doi: 10.1038/nrn1919
Mizumori, S. J. Y., Yeshenko, O., Gill, K. M. & Davis, D. M. Parallel processing across neural systems: implications for a multiple memory system hypothesis. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 82, 278–298 (2004).
pubmed: 15464410
doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2004.07.007
Yeshenko, O., Guazzelli, A. & Mizumori, S. J. Y. Context-dependent reorganization of spatial and movement representations by simultaneously recorded hippocampal and striatal neurons during performance of allocentric and egocentric tasks. Behav. Neurosci. 118, 751–769 (2004).
pubmed: 15301602
doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.751
Wiener, S. I. Spatial and behavioral correlates of striatal neurons in rats performing a self-initiated navigation task. J. Neurosci. 13, 3802–3817 (1993).
pubmed: 8366346
pmcid: 6576451
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-09-03802.1993
Whishaw, I. Q., Mittleman, G., Bunch, S. T. & Dunnett, S. B. Impairments in the acquisition, retention and selection of spatial navigation strategies after medial caudate-putamen lesions in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 24, 125–138 (1987).
pubmed: 3593524
doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(87)90250-6
Devan, B. D., McDonald, R. J. & White, N. M. Effects of medial and lateral caudate-putamen lesions on place- and cue-guided behaviors in the water maze: relation to thigmotaxis. Behav. Brain Res. 100, 5–14 (1999).
pubmed: 10212049
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(98)00107-7
Devan, B. D. & White, N. M. Parallel information processing in the dorsal striatum: relation to hippocampal function. J. Neurosci. 19, 2789–2798 (1999).
pubmed: 10087090
pmcid: 6786063
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02789.1999
Yin, H. H. & Knowlton, B. J. Contributions of striatal subregions to place and response learning. Learn. Mem. 11, 459–463 (2004).
pubmed: 15286184
pmcid: 498333
doi: 10.1101/lm.81004
Moser, E. I., Kropff, E. & Moser, M.-B. Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 69–89 (2008).
pubmed: 18284371
doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.061307.090723
Chersi, F. & Burgess, N. The Cognitive Architecture of Spatial Navigation: Hippocampal and Striatal Contributions. Neuron 88, 64–77 (2015).
pubmed: 26447573
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.021
Ekstrom, A. D., Huffman, D. J. & Starrett, M. Interacting networks of brain regions underlie human spatial navigation: a review and novel synthesis of the literature. J. Neurophysiol. 118, 3328–3344 (2017).
pubmed: 28931613
pmcid: 5814720
doi: 10.1152/jn.00531.2017
Frankland, P. W. & Bontempi, B. The organization of recent and remote memories. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 119–130 (2005).
pubmed: 15685217
doi: 10.1038/nrn1607
Dudchenko, P. A., Wood, E. R. & Eichenbaum, H. Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions have no effect on odor span and little effect on odor recognition memory but produce significant impairments on spatial span, recognition, and alternation. J. Neurosci. 20, 2964–2977 (2000).
pubmed: 10751449
pmcid: 6772220
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-08-02964.2000
Winocur, G., Moscovitch, M., Fogel, S., Rosenbaum, R. S. & Sekeres, M. Preserved spatial memory after hippocampal lesions: effects of extensive experience in a complex environment. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 273–275 (2005).
pubmed: 15723062
doi: 10.1038/nn1401
Hartley, T., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J. & Burgess, N. The well-worn route and the path less traveled: distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans. Neuron 37, 877–888 (2003).
pubmed: 12628177
doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00095-3
Juan, M. J. R. Preserved learning about allocentric cues but impaired flexible memory expression in rats with hippocampal lesions. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 93, 506–514 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.01.008
Eichenbaum, H. & Cohen, N. J. Can we reconcile the declarative memory and spatial navigation views on hippocampal function?. Neuron 83, 764–770 (2014).
pubmed: 25144874
pmcid: 4148642
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.032
Eichenbaum, H. The role of the hippocampus in navigation is memory. J. Neurophysiol. 117, 1785–1796 (2017).
pubmed: 28148640
pmcid: 5384971
doi: 10.1152/jn.00005.2017
Brown, T. I., Ross, R. S., Tobyne, S. M. & Stern, C. E. Cooperative interactions between hippocampal and striatal systems support flexible navigation. NeuroImage 60, 1316–1330 (2012).
pubmed: 22266411
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.046
Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F. & Kalish, D. Studies in spatial learning; place learning versus response learning. J. Exp. Psychol. 36, 221–229 (1946).
pubmed: 20985357
doi: 10.1037/h0060262
De Leonibus, E. et al. Cognitive and neural determinants of response strategy in the dual-solution plus-maze task. Learn. Mem. 18, 241–244 (2011).
pubmed: 21436396
doi: 10.1101/lm.2074311
Skinner, D. M. et al. An analysis of response, direction, and place learning in an open field and T maze. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 29, 3–13 (2003).
pubmed: 12561129
doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.1.3
Hall, J., Thomas, K. L. & Everitt, B. J. Cellular imaging of zif268 expression in the hippocampus and amygdala during contextual and cued fear memory retrieval: selective activation of hippocampal CA1 neurons during the recall of contextual memories. J. Neurosci. 21, 2186–2193 (2001).
pubmed: 11245703
pmcid: 6762622
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-06-02186.2001
Thomas, K. L., Hall, J. & Everitt, B. J. Cellular imaging with zif268 expression in the rat nucleus accumbens and frontal cortex further dissociates the neural pathways activated following the retrieval of contextual and cued fear memory. Eur. J. Neurosci. 16, 1789–1796 (2002).
pubmed: 12431232
doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02247.x
Laroche, S., Davis, S. & Bozon, B. A requirement for the immediate early gene zif268 in reconsolidation of recognition memory after retrieval. Neuron 40, 695–701 (2003).
pubmed: 14622575
doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00674-3
Tanimizu, T. et al. Functional connectivity of multiple brain regions required for the consolidation of social recognition memory. J. Neurosci. 37, 4103–4116 (2017).
pubmed: 28292834
pmcid: 6596582
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3451-16.2017
Silva, B. A., Burns, A. M. & Gräff, J. A cFos activation map of remote fear memory attenuation. Psychopharmacology 236, 369–381 (2019).
pubmed: 30116860
doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5000-y
Wheeler, A. L. et al. Identification of a functional connectome for long-term fear memory in mice. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002853–e1002918 (2013).
pubmed: 23300432
pmcid: 3536620
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002853
Daumas, S., Halley, H., Francés, B. & Lassalle, J. M. Encoding, consolidation, and retrieval of contextual memory: differential involvement of dorsal CA3 and CA1 hippocampal subregions. Learn. Mem. 12, 375–382 (2005).
pubmed: 16027176
pmcid: 1183255
doi: 10.1101/lm.81905
Ocampo, A. C., Squire, L. R. & Clark, R. E. Hippocampal area CA1 and remote memory in rats. Learn. Mem. 24, 563–568 (2017).
pubmed: 29038217
pmcid: 5647930
doi: 10.1101/lm.045781.117
Hunsaker, M. R. & Kesner, R. P. Unfolding the cognitive map_ The role of hippocampal and extra-hippocampal substrates based on a systems analysis of spatial processing. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 147, 90–119 (2018).
pubmed: 29222057
doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.11.012
Riedel, G. et al. Reversible neural inactivation reveals hippocampal participation in several memory processes. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 898–905 (1999).
pubmed: 10491611
doi: 10.1038/13202
Teixeira, C. M., Pomedli, S. R., Maei, H. R., Kee, N. & Frankland, P. W. Involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in the expression of remote spatial memory. J. Neurosci. 26, 7555–7564 (2006).
pubmed: 16855083
pmcid: 6674278
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1068-06.2006
Rinaldi, A., Oliverio, A., Romeo, S., Agustín-Pavón, C. & Mele, A. Distinct patterns of Fos immunoreactivity in striatum and hippocampus induced by different kinds of novelty in mice. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 94, 373–381 (2010).
pubmed: 20736076
doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.08.004
Lisman, J. E. & Grace, A. A. The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Neuron 46, 703–713 (2005).
pubmed: 15924857
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.002
Vinogradova, O. S. Hippocampus as comparator: role of the two input and two output systems of the hippocampus in selection and registration of information. Hippocampus 11, 578–598 (2001).
pubmed: 11732710
doi: 10.1002/hipo.1073
Jenkins, T. A., Amin, E., Pearce, J. M., Brown, M. W. & Aggleton, J. P. Novel spatial arrangements of familiar visual stimuli promote activity in the rat hippocampal formation but not the parahippocampal cortices: a c-fos expression study. Neuroscience 124, 43–52 (2004).
pubmed: 14960338
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.11.024
Lee, J. L. C. Memory reconsolidation mediates the updating of hippocampal memory content. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 168 (2010).
pubmed: 21120142
pmcid: 2991235
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00168
Jung, M. W., Lee, H., Jeong, Y., Lee, J. W. & Lee, I. Remembering rewarding futures: a simulation-selection model of the hippocampus. Hippocampus 28, 913–930 (2018).
pubmed: 30155938
pmcid: 6587829
doi: 10.1002/hipo.23023
Torromino, G. et al. Offline ventral subiculum-ventral striatum serial communication is required for spatial memory consolidation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5721 (2019).
pubmed: 31844154
pmcid: 6915753
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13703-3
McGeorge, A. J. & Faull, R. L. The organization of the projection from the cerebral cortex to the striatum in the rat. Neuroscience 29, 503–537 (1989).
pubmed: 2472578
doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90128-0
Berendse, H. W., Groenewegen, H. J. & Lohman, A. H. Compartmental distribution of ventral striatal neurons projecting to the mesencephalon in the rat. J. Neurosci. 12, 2079–2103 (1992).
pubmed: 1607929
pmcid: 6575937
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-06-02079.1992
Brog, J. S., Salyapongse, A., Deutch, A. Y. & Zahm, D. S. The patterns of afferent innervation of the core and shell in the ‘accumbens’ part of the rat ventral striatum: immunohistochemical detection of retrogradely transported fluoro-gold. J. Comp. Neurol. 338, 255–278 (1993).
pubmed: 8308171
doi: 10.1002/cne.903380209
Groenewegen, H. J., Wright, C. I. & Uylings, H. B. The anatomical relationships of the prefrontal cortex with limbic structures and the basal ganglia. J. Psychopharmacol. (Oxford) 11, 99–106 (1997).
doi: 10.1177/026988119701100202
Vertes, R. P. Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat. Synapse 51, 32–58 (2004).
pubmed: 14579424
doi: 10.1002/syn.10279
Yin, H. H., Knowlton, B. J. & Balleine, B. W. Blockade of NMDA receptors in the dorsomedial striatum prevents action-outcome learning in instrumental conditioning. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22, 505–512 (2005).
pubmed: 16045503
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04219.x
Woolley, D. G. et al. Homologous involvement of striatum and prefrontal cortex in rodent and human water maze learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3131–3136 (2013).
pubmed: 23382228
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217832110
pmcid: 3581978
Atallah, H. E., Lopez-Paniagua, D., Rudy, J. W. & O’Reilly, R. C. Separate neural substrates for skill learning and performance in the ventral and dorsal striatum. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 126–131 (2007).
pubmed: 17187065
doi: 10.1038/nn1817
Lavoie, A. M. & Mizumori, S. J. Spatial, movement- and reward-sensitive discharge by medial ventral striatum neurons of rats. Brain Res. 638, 157–168 (1994).
pubmed: 8199856
doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90645-9
Usiello, A. et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the nucleus accumbens are involved in detection of spatial novelty in mice. Psychopharmacology 123, 52–59 (1998).
Shibata, R., Mulder, A. B., Trullier, O. & Wiener, S. I. Position sensitivity in phasically discharging nucleus accumbens neurons of rats alternating between tasks requiring complementary types of spatial cues. Neuroscience 108, 391–411 (2001).
pubmed: 11738254
doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00400-6
Ferretti, V. et al. Ventral striatal plasticity and spatial memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7945–7950 (2010).
pubmed: 20351272
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911757107
pmcid: 2867912
Rinaldi, A., Oliverio, A. & Mele, A. Spatial memory, plasticity and nucleus accumbens. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 527–541 (2012).
pubmed: 23104853
doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2012-0070
Bontempi, B., Laurent-Demir, C., Destrade, C. & Jaffard, R. Time-dependent reorganization of brain circuitry underlying long-term memory storage. Nature 400, 671–675 (1999).
pubmed: 10458162
doi: 10.1038/23270
Euston, D. R., Gruber, A. J. & McNaughton, B. L. The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making. Neuron 76, 1057–1070 (2012).
pubmed: 23259943
pmcid: 3562704
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.002
Hyman, J. M., Hasselmo, M. E. & Seamans, J. K. What is the functional relevance of prefrontal cortex entrainment to hippocampal theta rhythms?. Front. Neurosci. 5, 24 (2011).
pubmed: 21427795
pmcid: 3052540
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00024
Kolb, B., Pittman, K., Sutherland, R. J. & Whishaw, I. Q. Dissociation of the contributions of the prefrontal cortex and dorsomedial thalamic nucleus to spatially guided behavior in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 6, 365–378 (1982).
pubmed: 7171389
doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(82)90018-3
Seamans, J. K., Floresco, S. B. & Phillips, A. G. Functional differences between the prelimbic and anterior cingulate regions of the rat prefrontal cortex. Behav. Neurosci. 109, 1063–1073 (1995).
pubmed: 8748957
doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.109.6.1063
Floresco, S. B., Seamans, J. K. & Phillips, A. G. Selective roles for hippocampal, prefrontal cortical, and ventral striatal circuits in radial-arm maze tasks with or without a delay. J. Neurosci. 17, 1880–1890 (1997).
pubmed: 9030646
pmcid: 6573377
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-05-01880.1997
Rinaldi, A., Mandillo, S., Oliverio, A. & Mele, A. D1 and D2 receptor antagonist injections in the prefrontal cortex selectively impair spatial learning in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 32, 309–319 (2007).
pubmed: 16900106
doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301176
Poucet, B. Object exploration, habituation, and response to a spatial change in rats following septal or medial frontal cortical damage. Behav. Neurosci. 103, 1009–1016 (1989).
pubmed: 2803548
doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.103.5.1009
Delatour, B. & Gisquet-Verrier, P. Prelimbic cortex specific lesions disrupt delayed-variable response tasks in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 110, 1282–1298 (1996).
pubmed: 8986332
doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.110.6.1282
Granon, S., Save, E., Buhot, M.-C. & Poucet, B. Effortful information processing in a spontaneous spatial situation by rats with medial prefrontal lesions. Behav. Brain Res. 78, 147–154 (1996).
pubmed: 8864046
doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00242-1
de Bruin, J. P., Moita, M. P., de Brabander, H. M. & Joosten, R. N. Place and response learning of rats in a Morris water maze: differential effects of fimbria fornix and medial prefrontal cortex lesions. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 75, 164–178 (2001).
pubmed: 11222058
doi: 10.1006/nlme.2000.3962
Lacroix, L., White, I. & Feldon, J. Effect of excitotoxic lesions of rat medial prefrontal cortex on spatial memory. Behav. Brain Res. 133, 69–81 (2002).
pubmed: 12048175
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00442-9
Kesner, R. P., Farnsworth, G. & DiMattia, B. V. Double dissociation of egocentric and allocentric space following medial prefrontal and parietal cortex lesions in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 103, 956–961 (1989).
pubmed: 2803562
doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.103.5.956
Hok, V., Save, E., Lenck-Santini, P. P. & Poucet, B. Coding for spatial goals in the prelimbic/infralimbic area of the rat frontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4602–4607 (2005).
pubmed: 15761059
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407332102
pmcid: 555486
Ragozzino, M. E., Detrick, S. & Kesner, R. P. Involvement of the prelimbic-infralimbic areas of the rodent prefrontal cortex in behavioral flexibility for place and response learning. J. Neurosci. 19, 4585–4594 (1999).
pubmed: 10341256
pmcid: 6782617
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04585.1999
Vidal-Gonzalez, I., Vidal-Gonzalez, B., Rauch, S. L. & Quirk, G. J. Microstimulation reveals opposing influences of prelimbic and infralimbic cortex on the expression of conditioned fear. Learn. Mem. 13, 728–733 (2006).
pubmed: 17142302
pmcid: 1783626
doi: 10.1101/lm.306106
Sierra-Mercado, D., Padilla-Coreano, N. & Quirk, G. J. Dissociable roles of prelimbic and infralimbic cortices, ventral hippocampus, and basolateral amygdala in the expression and extinction of conditioned fear. Neuropsychopharmacology 36, 529–538 (2010).
pubmed: 20962768
pmcid: 3005957
doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.184
Mukherjee, A. & Caroni, P. Infralimbic cortex is required for learning alternatives to prelimbic promoted associations through reciprocal connectivity. Nat. Commun. 9, 2727 (2018).
pubmed: 30006525
pmcid: 6045592
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05318-x
Hintiryan, H. et al. The mouse cortico-striatal projectome. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1100–1114 (2016).
pubmed: 27322419
pmcid: 5564682
doi: 10.1038/nn.4332
Colombo, P. J., Brightwell, J. J. & Countryman, R. A. Cognitive strategy-specific increases in phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein and c-Fos in the hippocampus and dorsal striatum. J. Neurosci 23, 3547–3554 (2003).
pubmed: 12716964
pmcid: 6742292
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-08-03547.2003
De Leonibus, E., Oliverio, A. & Mele, A. A study on the role of the dorsal striatum and the nucleus accumbens in allocentric and egocentric spatial memory consolidation. Learn. Mem. 12, 491–503 (2005).
pubmed: 16166396
pmcid: 1240061
doi: 10.1101/lm.94805
Miniaci, M. C. & De Leonibus, E. Missing the egocentric spatial reference: a blank on the map. F100Res 7, 168 (2018).
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13675.1
Ekstrom, A. D. A critical review of the allocentric spatial representation and its neural underpinnings: toward a network-based perspective. Front Hum Neurosci 8, 803 (2014).
pubmed: 25346679
pmcid: 4193251
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00803
Goodroe, S. C., Starnes, J. & Brown, T. I. The complex nature of hippocampal-striatal interactions in spatial navigation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12, 250 (2018).
pubmed: 29977198
pmcid: 6021746
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00250
Fouquet, C. et al. Complementary roles of the hippocampus and the dorsomedial striatum during spatial and sequence-based navigation behavior. PLoS ONE 8, e67232–e67311 (2013).
pubmed: 23826243
pmcid: 3695082
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067232
Franklin, K. B. J. & Paxinos, G. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 2nd edn. (Academic Press, Cambridge, 1997).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
pubmed: 14597658
pmcid: 403769
doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303