Age-related differences in correction behavior for unintended acceleration.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
19
03
2020
accepted:
26
06
2020
entrez:
11
7
2020
pubmed:
11
7
2020
medline:
23
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although unintended acceleration caused by pedal misapplication is a cause of traffic accidents, fatal accidents may be avoided if drivers realize their error immediately and quickly correct how they are stepping on the pedal. This correction behavior may decline with age because the rate of fatal accidents is fairly higher for older adults than for younger adults. To investigate this possibility, the present study recruited older adults (n = 40, age range = 67-81 years) as well as younger adults (n = 40, age range = 18-32 years). In this study, they performed a pedal stepping task during which they were required to stop the simulated vehicle as quickly as possible when a red signal was presented on a monitor. During most trials, the vehicle decelerated/stopped when the brake pedal was applied in a normal manner. In a few trials, however, stepping on the brake pedal resulted in sudden acceleration of the vehicle (i.e., the occurrence of the unintended acceleration); when this occurred, the participants had to release the pedal and re-step on another pedal to decelerate/stop the vehicle as quickly as possible. We focused on the age-related differences of the reaction latencies during three time periods: from the appearance of the red signal on the screen until stepping on the pedal (Period 1), from stepping on the pedal until the release of the pedal (Period 2), and from the release of the pedal until re-stepping of another pedal (Period 3). The results showed that there was no age-related difference in the latency of Period 1, p = .771, whereas those of Periods 2 and 3 were longer for the older adults (ps < .001). The results suggest that there are age-related differences in error detection and correction abilities under unintended situations with foot pedal manipulation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32649720
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236053
pii: PONE-D-20-07881
pmc: PMC7351190
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0236053Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;15(6):548-61
pubmed: 10861923
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Neuroimage. 2017 Nov 1;161:43-55
pubmed: 28811254
Biol Psychol. 2011 Jan;86(1):74-82
pubmed: 21056080
Hum Factors. 1986 Feb;28(1):91-6
pubmed: 3710489
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 23;9:193
pubmed: 25954175
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Nov 16;17(8):810-4
pubmed: 26980290
Neurobiol Aging. 2006 Sep;27(9):1335-45
pubmed: 16102874
Vision Res. 2008 May;48(10):1254-61
pubmed: 18396307
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 26;9:131
pubmed: 25859198
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56566
pubmed: 23418584
Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Jul 12;8:169
pubmed: 27462266
J Gerontol. 1982 May;37(3):342-8
pubmed: 7069159
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Sep;110:105-117
pubmed: 29870754
Front Psychol. 2010 Nov 25;1:209
pubmed: 21833265
Psychol Aging. 2000 Mar;15(1):126-47
pubmed: 10755295
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 13;9:177
pubmed: 26029072