Radiographic features in investigated for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a nested case-control study.
Computed tomography
Diagnosis
PCP
PJP
Pneumocysitis jirovecii
Pneumonia
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jul 2020
10 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
12
09
2019
accepted:
02
07
2020
entrez:
12
7
2020
pubmed:
12
7
2020
medline:
9
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) can be challenging to diagnose, often requiring bronchoscopy. Since most patients suspected of PJP undergo imaging, we hypothesized that the findings of these studies could help estimate the probability of disease prior to invasive testing. We created a cohort of patients who underwent bronchoscopy specifically to diagnose PJP and conducted a nested case-control study to compare the radiographic features between patients with (n = 72) and without (n = 288) pathologically proven PJP. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify radiographic features independently associated with PJP. Chest x-ray findings poorly predicted the diagnosis of PJP. However, multivariable analysis of CT scan findings found that "increased interstitial markings" (OR 4.3; 95%CI 2.2-8.2), "ground glass opacities" (OR 3.3; 95%CI 1.2-9.1) and the radiologist's impression of PJP being "possible" (OR 2.0; 95%CI 1.0-4.1) or "likely" (OR 9.3; 95%CI 3.4-25.3) were independently associated with the final diagnosis (c-statistic 0.75). Where there is clinical suspicion of PJP, the use of CT scan can help determine the probability of PJP. Identifying patients at low risk of PJP may enable better use of non-invasive testing to avoid bronchoscopy while higher probability patients could be prioritized.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) can be challenging to diagnose, often requiring bronchoscopy. Since most patients suspected of PJP undergo imaging, we hypothesized that the findings of these studies could help estimate the probability of disease prior to invasive testing.
METHODS
METHODS
We created a cohort of patients who underwent bronchoscopy specifically to diagnose PJP and conducted a nested case-control study to compare the radiographic features between patients with (n = 72) and without (n = 288) pathologically proven PJP. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify radiographic features independently associated with PJP.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Chest x-ray findings poorly predicted the diagnosis of PJP. However, multivariable analysis of CT scan findings found that "increased interstitial markings" (OR 4.3; 95%CI 2.2-8.2), "ground glass opacities" (OR 3.3; 95%CI 1.2-9.1) and the radiologist's impression of PJP being "possible" (OR 2.0; 95%CI 1.0-4.1) or "likely" (OR 9.3; 95%CI 3.4-25.3) were independently associated with the final diagnosis (c-statistic 0.75).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Where there is clinical suspicion of PJP, the use of CT scan can help determine the probability of PJP. Identifying patients at low risk of PJP may enable better use of non-invasive testing to avoid bronchoscopy while higher probability patients could be prioritized.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32650730
doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05217-x
pii: 10.1186/s12879-020-05217-x
pmc: PMC7350625
doi:
Types de publication
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
492Subventions
Organisme : Faculty of Medicine, McGill University
ID : Student Bursary
Organisme : Faculty of Medicine, McGill University
ID : Student Bursary
Références
Front Biosci. 1998 Jan 01;3:e1-12
pubmed: 9405333
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Oct;169(4):967-75
pubmed: 9308446
Respiration. 2018;96(1):52-65
pubmed: 29635251
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 5th Sep;129(17):2020-5
pubmed: 27569225
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Aug;116:10-17
pubmed: 29887230
Eur Radiol. 2003 May;13(5):1179-84
pubmed: 12695843
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;54(8):774-81
pubmed: 11470385
Lung. 2010 Apr;188(2):159-63
pubmed: 20049469
Clin Radiol. 1996 Oct;51(10):689-93
pubmed: 8893636
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jun;198(6):W555-61
pubmed: 22623570
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2010 Mar;24(1):107-38
pubmed: 20171548