'We all have the same right to have health services': a case study of Namati's legal empowerment program in Mozambique.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 29 01 2020
accepted: 01 07 2020
entrez: 12 7 2020
pubmed: 12 7 2020
medline: 1 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Legal empowerment and social accountability are two strategies that are increasingly used to address gaps in healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, including failure to provide services that should be available and poor clinical and interpersonal quality of care. This paper is an explanatory case study of a legal empowerment effort that employs community paralegals and trains Village Health Committees (VHCs) in Mozambique. The research objective was to explore how community paralegals solved cases, the impact paralegals had on health services, and how their work affected the relationship between the community and the health sector at the local level. The case study had two components: (1) a retrospective review of 24 cases of patient/community grievances about the health system, and (2) qualitative investigation of the program and program context. The case reviews were accomplished by conducting structured in-depth interviews (IDIs) with those directly involved in the case. The qualitative investigation entailed semi-structured Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with district, provincial, and national health managers and Namati staff. In addition, focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with Health Advocates and VHC members. Case resolution conferred a sense of empowerment to clients, brought immediate, concrete improvements in health service quality at the health facilities concerned, and seemingly instigated a virtuous circle of rights-claiming. The program also engendered incipient improvements in relations between clients and the health system. We identified three key mechanisms underlying case resolution, including: bolstered administrative capacity within the health sector, reduced transaction and political costs for health providers, and provider fear of administrative sanction. This study contributes to the limited literature regarding the mechanisms of legal empowerment case resolution in health systems and the impact of hybrid legal empowerment and social accountability approaches. Future research might assess the sustainability of case resolution; how governance at central, provincial, and district level is affected by similar programs; and to what extent the mix of different cases addressed by legal empowerment influences the success of the program.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Legal empowerment and social accountability are two strategies that are increasingly used to address gaps in healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, including failure to provide services that should be available and poor clinical and interpersonal quality of care. This paper is an explanatory case study of a legal empowerment effort that employs community paralegals and trains Village Health Committees (VHCs) in Mozambique. The research objective was to explore how community paralegals solved cases, the impact paralegals had on health services, and how their work affected the relationship between the community and the health sector at the local level.
METHODS METHODS
The case study had two components: (1) a retrospective review of 24 cases of patient/community grievances about the health system, and (2) qualitative investigation of the program and program context. The case reviews were accomplished by conducting structured in-depth interviews (IDIs) with those directly involved in the case. The qualitative investigation entailed semi-structured Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with district, provincial, and national health managers and Namati staff. In addition, focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with Health Advocates and VHC members.
RESULTS RESULTS
Case resolution conferred a sense of empowerment to clients, brought immediate, concrete improvements in health service quality at the health facilities concerned, and seemingly instigated a virtuous circle of rights-claiming. The program also engendered incipient improvements in relations between clients and the health system. We identified three key mechanisms underlying case resolution, including: bolstered administrative capacity within the health sector, reduced transaction and political costs for health providers, and provider fear of administrative sanction.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study contributes to the limited literature regarding the mechanisms of legal empowerment case resolution in health systems and the impact of hybrid legal empowerment and social accountability approaches. Future research might assess the sustainability of case resolution; how governance at central, provincial, and district level is affected by similar programs; and to what extent the mix of different cases addressed by legal empowerment influences the success of the program.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32650772
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09190-7
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-09190-7
pmc: PMC7350694
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1084

Subventions

Organisme : John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
ID : NA

Références

Health Policy Plan. 2016 Mar;31(2):267-75
pubmed: 26104820
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Sep 2;15(1):58
pubmed: 28865466
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jun;87:52-9
pubmed: 23631778
Qual Res Psychol. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202-222
pubmed: 27499705
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):233-246
pubmed: 28559689
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Jul 1;32(6):847-859
pubmed: 28369410
Confl Health. 2015 Sep 03;9:27
pubmed: 26336511
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Feb;32(1):125-140
pubmed: 27375128
Health Hum Rights. 2010 Jun 15;12(1):83-93
pubmed: 20930256
Glob Public Health. 2018 Dec;13(12):1853-1864
pubmed: 29671373
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15 Suppl 3:S3
pubmed: 26559118
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Dec;31(10):1467-1478
pubmed: 27190223
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 16;10:49
pubmed: 25885787
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Jul;19(7):791-801
pubmed: 24724617

Auteurs

Marta Schaaf (M)

, Brooklyn, USA. zmartaschaafconsult@gmail.com.

Joana Falcao (J)

, Brooklyn, USA.

Ellie Feinglass (E)

Namati Moçambique, Maputo, Mozambique.

Erin Kitchell (E)

Namati, Washington, DC, USA.

Nadja Gomes (N)

Namati Moçambique, Maputo, Mozambique.

Lynn Freedman (L)

Averting Maternal Death and Disability, Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH