Comparison of test performance of commercial anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays in serum and plasma samples.
Anti-SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
Immunoassay
Method comparison
Roche
Serologic assay
Journal
Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry
ISSN: 1873-3492
Titre abrégé: Clin Chim Acta
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 1302422
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
31
05
2020
revised:
29
06
2020
accepted:
03
07
2020
pubmed:
12
7
2020
medline:
29
10
2020
entrez:
12
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For epidemiologic, social and economic reasons, assessment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection prevalence and immunity are important to adapt decisions to current demands. Hence, immunoassays for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are introduced rapidly without requiring FDA emergency use authorization approval. Thus, evaluation of test performance predominantly relies on laboratories. This study aimed to evaluate the test performance of recently launched commercial immunoassays in serum and plasma samples. 51 serum samples from 26 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection after end of quarantine and 25 control patients were analyzed using anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays from Roche, Euroimmun and Epitope to assess diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. 20 matching pairs of serum and plasma samples were included to analyze comparability between different specimens. Overall, a diagnostic sensitivity of 92.3%, 96.2-100% and 100% with a respective diagnostic specificity of 100%, 100% and 84-86% for the immunoassays from Roche, Euroimmun and Epitope were determined. In total, 84-96% of samples were correctly classified as negative and 92.3-95.2% as positive. The level of concordance between plasma- and serum-based testing diverged between the assays (Epitope r The immunoassays from Euroimmun and Roche revealed a higher specificity than the Epitope assay without a substantial drop of diagnostic sensitivity. Significant differences between plasma- and serum-based testing highlights the need for determination of appropriate cut-offs per specimen type. Hence, there is an urgent need for test harmonization and establishment of quality standards for an appropriate use of COVID-19 serological tests.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
For epidemiologic, social and economic reasons, assessment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection prevalence and immunity are important to adapt decisions to current demands. Hence, immunoassays for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are introduced rapidly without requiring FDA emergency use authorization approval. Thus, evaluation of test performance predominantly relies on laboratories. This study aimed to evaluate the test performance of recently launched commercial immunoassays in serum and plasma samples.
METHODS
METHODS
51 serum samples from 26 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection after end of quarantine and 25 control patients were analyzed using anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays from Roche, Euroimmun and Epitope to assess diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. 20 matching pairs of serum and plasma samples were included to analyze comparability between different specimens.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, a diagnostic sensitivity of 92.3%, 96.2-100% and 100% with a respective diagnostic specificity of 100%, 100% and 84-86% for the immunoassays from Roche, Euroimmun and Epitope were determined. In total, 84-96% of samples were correctly classified as negative and 92.3-95.2% as positive. The level of concordance between plasma- and serum-based testing diverged between the assays (Epitope r
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The immunoassays from Euroimmun and Roche revealed a higher specificity than the Epitope assay without a substantial drop of diagnostic sensitivity. Significant differences between plasma- and serum-based testing highlights the need for determination of appropriate cut-offs per specimen type. Hence, there is an urgent need for test harmonization and establishment of quality standards for an appropriate use of COVID-19 serological tests.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32652161
pii: S0009-8981(20)30323-5
doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.07.007
pmc: PMC7343640
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
73-78Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Clin Chem. 2020 Aug 1;66(8):1107-1109
pubmed: 32484860
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Oct;509:18-21
pubmed: 32485155
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 31;15(3):e0230405
pubmed: 32231374
Euro Surveill. 2020 Apr;25(16):
pubmed: 32347204
Malays J Pathol. 2020 Apr;42(1):13-21
pubmed: 32342927
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Jun;18(3):333-334
pubmed: 32266703
Herz. 2020 Jun;45(4):313-315
pubmed: 32333025
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104394
pubmed: 32416599
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 May;20(5):269-270
pubmed: 32273594
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1478-1488
pubmed: 32267220
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40
pubmed: 32101510
Clin Chem. 2020 Aug 1;66(8):1104-1106
pubmed: 32484887
Clin Chem. 2020 Aug 1;66(8):1055-1062
pubmed: 32402061
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242
pubmed: 32091533
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2302-2315
pubmed: 32289214
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):778-785
pubmed: 32198501
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):
pubmed: 32350047
Trends Immunol. 2020 May;41(5):355-359
pubmed: 32249063
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Apr 05;10(4):
pubmed: 32260471
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;35(4):331-333
pubmed: 32318914
Virus Res. 2014 Dec 19;194:175-83
pubmed: 24670324
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2066-2072
pubmed: 32357209
Clin Chem. 2020 Jul 1;66(7):875-877
pubmed: 32343775
Cell Biosci. 2020 Mar 16;10:40
pubmed: 32190290
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 May;55(5):105955
pubmed: 32234468
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 Jul;31(5):560-564
pubmed: 32319131
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 Oct;31(7):841-847
pubmed: 32413201